Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 514-520

  Eimer, Martin ^b   Schlaghecken, Friederike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL INHIBITION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036731257     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196307     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. CHEESMAN, J., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 343-367.
2. DEHAENE, S., NACCACHE, L., LE CLEC'H, G., KOECHLIN, E., MUELLER, M., DEHAENE-LAMBERTZ, G., VAN DE MOORTELE, P.-F., & LE BIHAN, D. (1999). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature. 395, 597-600.
3. EIMER. M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 30, 146-156.
4. EIMER, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
5. EIMER, M., & SCHLAGHECKEN, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
6. HOLENDER, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
7. HOUGHTON, G., & TIPPER, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. KAERNBACH, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 227-229.
9. LEUTHOLD, H., & KOPP, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
10. MARCEL, A. J. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 435-457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. MERIKLE, P. M., & JOORDENS, S. (1997). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 219-236.
12. NEUMANN, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
13. NEUMANN, O., & KLOTZ, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moskovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 123-150). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
14. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (1997). The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation. Sprache und Kognition, 16, 166-175.
15. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER, M. (2000). A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1367-1382.
16. SCHLAGHECKEN, F., & EIMER M. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 148-162.