Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming

Biological Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 7-26

  Eimer, Martin ^a   Schlaghecken, Friederike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event related brain potentials; Inhibition; Motor control; Motor processes; Subliminal stimuli

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONSCIOUSNESS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; IMAGING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 0242289636     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aron A.R., Schlaghecken F., Fletcher P.C., Bullmore E.T., Eimer M., Barker R.A., Sahakian B.J., Robbins T.W. Inhibition of subliminally primed responses is mediated by caudate and thalamus: evidence form functional MRI and Huntington's disease. Brain. 126:2003;713-723.
2. Allport A., Tipper S., Chmiel N.R.J. Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. Posner M.I. Attention and Performance XI. 1985;107-132 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
3. Arbuthnott K.D. Inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: phenomena and models. Current Psychology of Cognition. 14:1995;3-45.
4. Band G.P., van Boxtel G.J. Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica. 101:1999;179-211.
5. Coles M.G. Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology. 26:1989;251-269.
6. Coles M.G., Gratton G., Bashore T.R., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 11:1985;529-553.
7. Coles M.G., Gratton G., Donchin E. Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology. 26:1988;69-89.
8. Dehaene S., Naccache L., Le Clec'H G., Koechlin E., Mueller M., Dehaene-Lambertz G., van de Moortele P.-F., Le Bihan D. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature. 395:1999;597-600.
9. De Jong R., Wierda M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;682-692.
10. De Jong R., Coles M.G., Logan G.D., Gratton G. In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;164-182.
11. De Jong R., Coles M.G., Logan G.D. Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;498-511.
12. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology. 35:1993;123-138.
13. Eimer M. The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activiation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers. 30:1998;146-156.
14. Eimer M. Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance. Acta Psychologica. 101:1999;293-313.
15. Eimer M., Coles M.G. The Lateralized Readiness Potential. Jahanshahi M., Hallett M. The Bereitschaftspotential: In Honour of Professors Deecke and Kornhuber. 2002;229-248 Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
16. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24:1998;1737-1747.
17. Eimer M., Schlaghecken F. Response facilitation and inhibition in manual, vocal, and oculomotor performance: evidence for a modality-unspecific mechanism. Journal of Motor Behaviour. 33:2001;16-26.
18. Eimer, M., Schlaghecken, F., 2002. Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 514-520.
19. Eimer M., Schubö A., Schlaghecken F. The locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives. Journal of Motor Behaviour. 34:2002;3-10.
20. Eriksen C.W., Schultz D.W. Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception & experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics. 25:1979;249-263.
21. Eriksen C.W., Coles M.G., Morris L.R., O'Hara W.P. An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 23:1985;165-168.
22. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica. 101:1999;267-291.
23. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;331-344.
24. Hagenzieker M.P., van der Heijden A.H.C. Time-courses in visual-information processing: some theoretical considerations. Psychological Research. 52:1990;5-12.
25. Hagenzieker M.P., van der Heijden A.H.C., Hagenaar R. Time-courses in visual-information processing: some empirical evidence for inhibition. Psychological Research. 52:1990;13-21.
26. Hochhaus L., Johnston J.C. Perceptual repetition blindness effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;355-366.
27. Houghton G., Tipper S.P. Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: applications to selective attention and sequential action. Brain and Cognition. 30:1996;20-43.
28. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 82:1992;477-482.
29. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token identification. Cognition. 27:1987;117-143.
30. Klapp S.T., Hinkley L.B. The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 131:2002;255-269.
31. Klotz W., Wolff P. The effect of masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research. 58:1995;92-101.
32. Kok A. Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in Go/Nogo reaction tasks. Biological Psychology. 32:1986;21-38.
33. Konishi S., Nakajima K., Uchida I., Sekihara K., Miyashita Y. No-go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. European Journal of Neuroscience. 10:1998;1209-1213.
34. Kopp B., Mattler U., Goertz R., Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 99:1996;19-27.
35. Kopp B., Rist F., Mattler U. N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology. 33:1996;282-294.
36. Liddle P.F., Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M. Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Human Brain Mapping. 12:2001;100-109.
37. Lie I. Visual detection and resolution as a function of retinal locus. Vision Research. 20:1980;967-974.
38. Marcel T. Conscious and preconcscious recognition of polysemous words: locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. Nickersen R.S. Attention and Performance VIII. 1980;435-457 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
39. McCormick P.A. Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;168-180.
40. Menon V., Adleman N.E., White C.D., Glover G.H., Reiss A.L. Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping. 12:2001;131-143.
41. Merikle P.M., Joordens S., Stolz J. Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Consciousness and Cognition. 4:1995;422-439.
42. Michel, F., 2000. The negative compatibility effect in masked priming: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Western Australia.
43. Miller J. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 8:1982;273-296.
44. Miller J. Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica. 67:1988;191-257.
45. Naito E., Matsamura M. Movement-related potentials associated with motor inhibition as determined by use of a stop-signal paradigm in humans. Cognitive Brain Research. 2:1994;139-146.
46. Neill W.T., Valdes. L.A., Terry K.M. Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. Dempster F.N., Brainerd C.J. Interference and Inhibition in Cognition. 1995;207-261 Academic Press, San Diego.
47. Neumann O. Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research. 52:1990;207-225.
48. Neumann O., Klotz W. Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: where is the limit of direct parameter specification? Umiltà C., Moskovitch M. Attention and Performance XV. 1994;123-150 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
49. Rijsdijk J.P., . Kroon J.N., van der Wildt G.J. Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina. Vision Research. 20:1980;235-241.
50. Rubia K., Overmeyer S., Russell T., Brammer M.J., Bullmore E.T., Sharma T., Simmons A., Williams S.C.R., Andrew C.M., Taylor E. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. NeuroImage. 13:2001;239-249.
51. Sanders A.F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. Stelmach G.E., Requin J. Tutorials in Motor Behavior. 1980;331-354 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
52. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. The influence of subliminally presented primes on response preparation. Sprache & Kognition. 16:1997;166-175.
53. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. A central/peripheral asymmetry in subliminal priming. Perception & Psychophysics. 62:2000;1367-1382.
54. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Partial response activation to masked primes is not dependent on response readiness. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 92:2001;208-222.
55. Schlaghecken F., Eimer M. Motor activation with and without inhibition: evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics. 64:2002;148-162.
56. Smid H.G.O.M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J.M. Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica. 74:1990;169-201.
57. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica. 30:1969;276-315.
58. Vorberg, D., 2000. Priming durch bewußte und unbewußte Reize [Priming by supraliminal and subliminal stimuli]. Conference Abstract, 3. Tuebinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz (TWK), February 2000.