Assessing effectiveness and efficiency of academic interventions in school psychology journals: 1995-2005

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 114-125

  Bramlett, Ron ^a   Cates, Gary L ^b   Savina, Elena ^c   Lauinger, Brittni ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Portland Public Schools ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955637605     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20457     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., Jones, K. M., & Lentz, F. E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
2. Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
3. Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.
4. Bliss, S. L., Skinner, C. H., Hautau, B., & Carroli, E. E. (2008). Articles published in four school psychology journals from 2000 to 2005: An analysis of experimental/intervention research. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 483-498.
5. Bramlett, R. K., Murphy, J. J., Johnson, J., Wallingsford, L., & Hall, J. D. (2002). Contemporary practices in school psychology: A national survey of roles and referral problems. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 327-335.
6. Burns, M. K., Dean, V. J., &Foley, S. (2004). Pre-teaching unknown key words with incremental rehearsal to improve reading fluency and comprehension with children identified as reading disabled. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 303-314.
7. Cates, G. L. (2005). Effects of peer versus computer-assisted drill on mathematics response rates. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 637-646.
8. Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37(4), 339-348.
9. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H.,Watson, T. S., Meadows, T. J.,Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32, 601-616.
10. Clarfield, J., & Stoner, G. (2005). The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 246-255.
11. Daly, E. J., Persampieri, M., McCurdy, M., & Gortmaker, V. (2005). Generating reading interventions through experimental analysis of academic skills: Demonstration and empirical validation. School Psychology Review, 34, 395-414.
12. Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
13. Fiala, C. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2003). Parent involvement and reading: Using curriculum-based measurement to assess the effects of paired reading. Psychology in the Schools, 40(6), 613-626.
14. Freeland, J. T., Skinner, C. H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, E., & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated reading intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37(5), 415- 429.
15. Fuchs, L. S.,&Fuchs, D. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying learning histories. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 604-621.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 569-584.
17. Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Winn, B. D., Oliver, B., Allin, J. D. & Molloy, C. C. M. (2005). An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 39-51.
18. Hawkins, J., Skinner, C. H., & Oliver, R. (2005). The effects of task demands and additive interspersal ratios on fifth-grade students' mathematics accuracy. School Psychology Review, 34(5), 543-555.
19. Joseph, L. M. (2002). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort phonic procedures. School Psychology Review, 31, 122-130.
20. Kovaleski, J. F. (2002). Best practices in operating pre-referral intervention teams. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 645-655). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
21. Kratochwill, T. (2005). Theories of change and adoption of innovations: The evolving evidence-based intervention and practice movement in school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 475-494.
22. Lennon, J. E., & Slesinski, J. E. (1999). Early intervention in reading: Results of a screening and intervention program for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 28(3), 353-365.
23. Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perception of mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event? School Psychology Quarterly, 13(4), 322-331.
24. National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE). (2006). Response to intervention: Policy consider-ations and implementation. Washington, DC: NASDSE.
25. O'Connor, E.A.,&Simic,O. (2002). The effect of reading recovery on special education referrals and placements. Psychology in the Schools, 39(6), 635-646.
26. Ota, K. R., & DuPaul, G. J. (2002). Task engagement and mathematics performance in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects of supplemental computer instruction. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), 242-257.
27. Quiroga, T., Lemos-Britton, Z., Mostafapour, E., Abbot, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2002). Phonological awareness and beginning reading in Spanish speaking ESL first graders. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 85-111.
28. Reschly, D. J. (2004). Commentary: Paradigm shift, outcomes criteria, and behavioral interventions: Foundations for the future of school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 408-416.
29. Roberts, M. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on student's reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73-91.
30. Robinson, S. L., Skinner, C. H., & Brown, C. S. (1998). An analysis of articles appearing in school psychology journals from 1985-1994. Proven Practices, 1, 28-33.
31. Sandoval, J. (1993). The history of interventions in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 31, 195-217.
32. Seethaler, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). A drop in the bucket: Randomized controlled trials testing reading and math interventions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 98-102.
33. Shapiro, E. S. (2000). School psychology from an instructional perspective: Solving big, not little problems. School Psychology Review, 29(4), 560-572.
34. Skinner, C. H. (Ed.). (2004). Single-subject designs for school psychologists. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
35. Skinner, C. H., Logan, P., Robinson, S. I.,&Robinson, D. H. (1997).Myths and realities of modeling as a reading intervention: Beyond acquisition. School Psychology Review, 26, 437-447.
36. Spicuzza, R., Ysseldyke, J., Lemkuil, A., Kosciolek, S., Boys, C., & Teeluchsigngh, E. (2001). Effects of curriculum based monitoring on classroom instruction and math achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 521-542.
37. Strein,W. (1987). Needs versus deeds: The unfulfilled research potential in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 3-13.
38. Strong, A. C., Wehby, J. H., Falk, K. B., & Lane, K. L. (2004). The impact of a structured reading curriculum and repeated reading on the performance of junior high students with emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 561-582.
39. Taverne, A., & Sheridan, S.M. (1995). Parent training in interactive book reading: An investigation of its effects with families at risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 10(1), 41-64.
40. Tingstrom, D. H., Edwards, R. P., & Olmi, D. J. (1995). Listening previewing in reading to read: Relative effects on oral reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 318-327.
41. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. C., & Tanzman, M. S. (1998). The case for early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 367-397.
42. Watson, T. S., & Ray, K. P. (1997). The effects of different units of measurement on instructional decision making. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(1), 42-53.
43. Weiner, R. K., Sheridan, S. M., & Jenson, W. R. (1998). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and a structured homework program on math completion and accuracy in junior high students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(4), 281-309.
44. Wildmon, M. E., Skinner, C. H.,McCurdy,M., & Sims, S. (1999). Improving secondary students' perception of the "dreaded mathematics word problem assignment" by giving them more word problems. Psychology in the Schools, 36(4), 319-326.
45. Witmer, L. (1907). Clinical psychology. Psychological Clinic, 1, 1-9.