Effects of curriculum-based monitoring on classroom instruction and math achievement

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 521-542

  Spicuzza, Richard ^a,b   Ysseldyke, Jim ^a,b   Lemkuil, Amy ^a,b   Kosciolek, Stacey ^a,b   Boys, Christopher ^a,b   Teelucksingh, Ellen ^a,b  

^a Minneapolis Public Schools   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement; Curriculum based monitoring; Instructional environment; Math

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035510782     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00087-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J., & Elliott, J. (1998). Strategies and Tactics for Effective Instruction. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
2. Black, P., & Williams, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
3. Brophy, J. E. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069-1077.
4. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. L. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Ed., pp. 328-375). New York: MacMillan.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
6. Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 21-31.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
8. Denham, C. H., & Lieberman, A. (Eds.). (1980). Time to Learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
9. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
10. Deno, S. L. (1986). Formative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 15, 358-374.
11. Everyday Learning Corporation. (1997). Content by Strands [Brochure]. Chicago, IL: Everyday Learning.
12. Fuchs, L. S. (1986). Monitoring progress among mildly handicapped pupils: Review of current practices and research. Remedial and Special Education, 5(7), 5-12.
13. Fuchs, L. S. (1992). Classwide decision-making with computerized curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 30-33.
14. Fuchs, L. A., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K, (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum- based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement: A methodology for evaluating and improving student programs. Diagnostique, 14(1), 3-13.
16. Gettinger, M., & Stoiber, K. C. (1999). Excellence in teaching: Review of instructional and environmental variables. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), Handbook of School Psychology. New York: Wiley.
17. Greenwood, C., Carta, J., Kamps, D., & Delquadri, J. (1995). Ecobehavioral Assessment System Software (EBASS): Practitioner's Manual. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies.
18. Northwest Evaluation Association. (1996). Achievement Level Tests Technical Description. Portland, OR: Author.
19. Odom, S. L. (1988). Research in early childhood special education. In S. L. Odom & M. B. Karns (Eds.), Early Intervention for Infants and Children with Disabilities: An Empirical Base (pp. 1-21). Baltimore: Brookes.
20. Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1985). Explicit comprehension instruction: The model, the research, and the concerns. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL April.
21. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading Instruction that Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
22. Renaissance Learning, Inc. (1998a). Accelerated math [computer program]. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Advantage Learning Systems (http://www.renaissancelearning.com).
23. Renaissance Learning, Inc. (1998b). Star Math Users Manual. Madison, WI: Advantage Learning Systems.
24. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Assessment (7th Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
26. The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (1998). The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project [Brochure]. Chicago, IL: Author.
27. U. S. Department of Education. (1998). The Condition of Education 1998 (NCES Publication No. 98-103). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
28. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.
29. Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. American Educator, 23(3), 14-19.
30. Ysseldyke, J., & Christenson, S. (1987). Evaluating students' instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8(3), 17-24.
31. Ysseldyke, J., & Christenson, S. (1993). The Instructional Environment System-II: A System to Identify A Student's Instructional Needs. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
32. Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., & McGill, S. (2000). Changes in Mathematics Achievement and Instructional Ecology Resulting from Implementation of A Learning Information System. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Classroom-Based Assessment Project, National Center on Educational Outcomes.