Physics instruction in secondary schools: An investigation of teachers’ beliefs towards physics laboratory and ICT

Research in Science and Technological Education

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 185-202

  Siorenta, Anastassia ^a   Jimoyiannis, Athanassios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PELOPONNESE   (Greece)

Author keywords

ICT; physics education; teachers beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955560320     PISSN: 02635143     EISSN: 14701138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02635140802037328     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. AAAS. American Association for the Advancement of Science. See
2. Aguirre, M., and Haggerty, S., 1995. Preservice teachers’ meanings of learning. International Journal of Science Education, 17: 119–31.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy, New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E.K., and Isnes, A., 2004. Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88 (5): 683–706.
5. Baggott la Velle, L., Wishart, J., McFarlane, A., Brawn, R., and John, P., 2007. Teaching and learning with ICT within the subject culture of secondary school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25 (3): 339–49.
6. Bandura, A., 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
7. Becker, H.J., How are teachers using computers in instruction?. 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle. http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/conferences-pdf/how_are_teachers_using.pdf
8. Becta. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. See
9. Benzécri, J. P., 1992. Correspondence Analysis Handbook, New York: Marcel Dekker.
10. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. 2004. A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
11. CUF. Curriculum Unified Framework. See
12. Curriculum Unified Framework. 1998. Curriculum unified framework, Athens: Pedagogical Institute [in Greek]. Ministry of Education
13. Cuban, L., 1990. Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19 (1): 3–13.
14. Cuban, L., 2001. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. de Jong, T., and Joolingen, W.R., 1998. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2): 179–202.
16. De Vos, W., and Reiding, J., 1999. Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in the Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21: 711–19.
17. Drenoyianni, H., and Selwood, I.D., 1998. Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers’ perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 3 (2): 87–99.
18. Eisner, E.W., 2000. Those who ignore the past…: 12 ‘easy’ lessons for the next millennium. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32 (2): 343–57.
19. Flores, F., Lopez, A., Gallegos, L., and Barojas, J., 2000. Transforming science and learning concepts of physics teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (2): 197–208.
20. Furio, C., Vilches, A., Guisasola, J., and Romo, V., 2002. Spanish teacher’s views of the goals of science education in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20 (1): 39–52.
21. Greenacre, M.J., 1993. Correspondence Analysis in Practice, London: Academic Press.
22. Gunstone, R.F., Slattery, M., Bair, J.R., and Northfield, J.R., 1993. A case study exploration of development in preservice science teachers. Science Education, 77: 47–73.
23. Haney, I.J., Czerniak, C.M., and Lumpe, A.T., 1996. Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (9): 971–93.
24. Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., and Brindley, S., 2005. Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constrains, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 (2): 155–92.
25. Hewson, P.W., and Hewson, M.G., 1987. Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching: Implications for teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 9 (4): 425–40.
26. Institute of Physics. 2001. Physics-building a flourishing future. Report of the inquiry into undergraduate physics, London: Institute of Physics. www.iop.org/activity/policy/Projects/Archive/file_6418.pdf
27. IOP. Institute of Physics. See
28. Jimoyiannis, A., 2008. “ Factors determining teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of ICT in education ”. In Encyclopedia of information communication technology, Edited by: Cartell, A., and Palma, M., Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
29. Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2001. Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36: 183–204.
30. Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2003. Investigating Greek students’ ideas about forces and motion. Research in Science Education, 33: 375–92.
31. Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2006. Exploring secondary education teachers’ attitudes and beliefs towards ICT adoption in education. THEMES in Education, 7 (2): 181–204.
32. Jimoyiannis, A., and Komis, V., 2007. Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11 (2): 181–204.
33. Jonassen, D.H., 2000. Computers as mind tools for schools, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Jonassen, D.H., Howland, J., Moore, J., and Marra, R.M., 2003. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Kagan, D.M., 1992. Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27: 65–90.
36. Koballa, T., Graber, W., Coleman, D.C., and Kemp, A.C., 2000. Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (2): 209–24.
37. Koulaidis, V., and Ogborn, J., 1995. Science teachers’ philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them?. International Journal of Science Education, 17 (3): 273–83.
38. Lederman, N.G., 1999. Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (8): 916–29.
39. Lumpe, A.T., Haney, J.J., and Czerniak, C.M., 2000. Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (3): 275–92.
40. McDermott, L.C., 1993. How we teach and how students learn–a mismatch?. American Journal of Physics, 61 (4): 295–8.
41. Mellado, V., 1998. The classroom practice of preservice teachers’ and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Teacher Education, 82: 197–214.
42. Munby, H., Cunningham, M., and Lock, C., 2000. School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Teacher Education, 84: 193–211.
43. National Curriculum for England. 2004. National Curriculum for England http://www.nc.uk.net/home.html
44. NCE. National Curriculum for England. See
45. Neuschatz, M., and McFarling, M., 1999. Maintaining momentum. High school physics for a new millenium, College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/highlite/hs2/high2.htm
46. Newton, L.R., 2000. Data-logging in practical science: Research and reality. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (12): 1247–59.
47. National Research Council. 1996. National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Research Council/National Academy Press.
48. NRC. National Research Council. See
49. Nuffield Foundation. 2002. Science for public understanding http://www.nuffield.org/spu
50. Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Odysseia. 2000. http://odysseia.cti.gr/English/ODYSSEIANEW/about.htm
52. OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. See
53. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. “ Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006 ”. http://www.pisa.oecd.org
54. Pajares, M.F., 1992. Teacher beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62: 307–32.
55. Rennie, L.J., Goodrum, D., and Hackling, M., 2001. Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31 (4): 455–98.
56. Rialle, V., and Danel, V., 2003. Watching symptoms and illnesses through the eyes of multiple correspondence analysis: A case study in toxicology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 95: 595–600.
57. Russel, M., Bebell, D., O’ Dwyer, L., and O’Connor, K., 2003. Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (4): 297–310.
58. Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., and Brindley, S., 2004. Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, mathematics and science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20: 259–75.
59. SCF. Science Curriculum Framework. See
60. Science Curriculum Framework. 1998. “ Science: Learning area statement ”. http://www.curriculum.wa.edu. au/files/pdf/science.pdf
61. Simmons, P.E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., and Crockett, D., 1999. Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (8): 930–54.
62. SPAD. 2008. http://eng.spad.eu
63. Tao, P.K., and Gunstone, R.F., 1999. Conceptual change in science through collaborative learning at the computer. International Journal of Science Education, 21: 39–57.
64. Tobin, K., McRobbie, C., and Anderson, D., 1997. Dialectical constraints to the discursive practices of a high school physics community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (5): 491–507.
65. Tobin, K., and McRobbie, C.J., 1996. Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80: 223–41.
66. Tsai, C.C., 2002. Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (8): 771–83.
67. TTICTE. 2005. “ Teachers training in ICT in education. Greek Ministry of Education ”. http://www.eye-ypepth.gr/epimorfosi_B/index.php?p=0 (in Greek)
68. Van der Heijden, P.G.M., Teunissen, J., and van Orlé, C., 1997. Multiple correspondence analysis as a tool for quantification or classification of career data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22 (4): 447–77.
69. Van Driel, J.H., Beijaard, D., and Verloop, N., 2001. Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (2): 137–58.
70. Waite, S., 2004. Tools for the job: A report of two surveys of information and communications technology training and use for literacy in primary schools in the West of England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20: 11–20.
71. Wallace, C., and Kang, N.H., 2004. An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (9): 936–60.
72. Webb, M.E., 2005. Affordances of ICT in science learning implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (6): 705–35.
73. Webb, M., and Cox, M., 2004. A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13 (3): 235–86.
74. Zacharia, Z., 2003. Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (8): 792–823.