No such thing as failure, only feedback: Designing innovative opportunities for E-assessment and technology-mediated feedback

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 197-224

  Miller, Charles ^a   Doering, Aaron ^a   Scharber, Cassandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955484748     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C, Kulik, J., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instruction effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 218-238.
2. Bednarz, S. W. (1999). Reaching new standards: GIS and K-12 geography. Retrieved April 10,2001, from: http://www.odyseey.maine.edu/gisweb/spatdb/ gislis95/gi95006.html
3. Bednarz, S., & Audet R. (2003). The status of GIS technology in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Geography, 98, 60-67.
4. Black, P. & William, D. (1998, October). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
5. Butler, A., & Roediger, H. (2008) Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory and Cognition, 36, 604-616.
6. Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1-27 (Pubitemid 33400631)
7. Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219-232.
8. Deno, S. (2003). Developments in durriculum-based measurement, The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184-192.
9. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C, & Miller, C. (2009). Using the Technological, Pedagogical, And Content Knowledge Framework to Design Online Learning Environments and Professional Development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346.
10. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Hybrid Online Education: Identifying Integration Models using Adventure Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41 (1), 101-119.
11. Doering, A., Lewis, C, Veletsianos, G., & Nichols, K. (2008). Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Instant Messaging in Two Educational Contexts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25 (1), 45-52.
12. Doering, A., Scharber, C, Miller, C, & Veletsianos, G. (2009). Geo Thentic: Designing and assessing with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(3), Retrieved from http://www.citejoumal.org/vol9/iss3/socialstudies/ article1.cfm.
13. Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). An Investigation of the Use of Real-Time, Authentic Geospatial Data in the K-12 Classroom. Journal of Geography, Special Issue on Using Geospatial Data in Geographic Education, 106(6), 217-225.
14. Emerson, J. (2008). Visualizing information for advocacy. Retrieved April 4, 2009 from http:// backspace.com/infodesign.pdf.
15. Esterbrooks, S. & Huston, S.G. (2008) The signed reading fluency of students who are deaf/hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(1), 37-54.
16. Ewoldt, C. (1987). Reading tests and the deaf reader. Perspectives for Teachers of the Hearing Impaired, 4, 10-13.
17. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208.
18. Gordon, B., Englehardt, G., Gabrielson, S., & Bemknopf, S. (1996). Conceptual issues in equating performance assessments: Lessons from writing assessments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 81-88.
19. Haas, M. (2005). Teaching methods for secondary algebra: A meta-analysis of findings. NASSP Bulletin, 89(642), 24-46.
20. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
21. Hooper, S., Miller, C, Rose, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). The effects of digital video quality on learner comprehension in an American Sign Language assessment environment. Sign Language Studies, 8(1), 42-58.
22. Kelly, R. (2005). Pebbles in the Mainstream: The future of research in the Education of the Deaf: Considerations to alternatives to traditional face-to-face data collection strategies. Montreal: American Education Research Association.
23. Kerski, J. (1999). A nationwide analysis of the implementation of GIS in high school education. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California.
24. Luckner, J., & Bowen, S. (2006) Assessment practices of professionals serving students who are deaf or hard of hearing: An initial investigation. American Annals of the Deaf, (4), 410-417.
25. Luckner, J. J., & Streckler, P . (2007). Survey of teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing use and attitudes Toward CBM and progress monitoring. Association of College Educators-Deaf/Hard of Hearing Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA: January.
26. Lupton, L. & Zelaznik, H. (1990). Motor learning in sign langue students. Sign Language Studies, 67, 153-174.
27. Marschark, M., & Harris, M. (1996). Success and failure in learning to read: The special case of deaf children. In J. Oakhill & C. Comoldi (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension disabilities: Processes and intervention (pp. 279-300). Mahwah, NJ: Er-Ibaum.
28. Marschark, M., Lang, H. G., & Albertini, J. A. (2002). Educating deaf students: From research to practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
30. Miller, C, & Hooper, S. (2008). Avenue ASL: Transforming curriculum through design, theory, and innovation. Tech Trends, 52(3), 27-32.
31. Miller, C, Hooper, S., & Rose, S. (2005). Avenue ASL: Developing an environment for capturing, evaluating, and monitoring American Sign Language learner performance. Advanced Technology for Learning, 2(3), 140-147.
32. Miller, C, Hooper, S., Rose, S., Montalto-Rook, M. (2008). Transforming e-assessment in American Sign Language: Pedagogical and technological enhancements in online language learning and performance assessment. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 155-168.
33. Nelson, M. & Schunn, C. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Sciences, 37(4), 375-401.
34. Newell, W., & Caccamise, F. (1992). Sign Communication Proficiency Interview (SCPI) manual: Rating scale. Faribault, MN: Minnesota Resource Center for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
35. Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Homer, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 181-194.
36. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
37. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. (2010). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Rose, S., McAnally, P., & Quigley, S.P. (2004). Language practices with deaf children (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
39. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
40. Shinn, M. & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: "Big ideas" and avoiding confusion. In, M. R. Shinn (ed.) Advanced Applications of Curriculum-Based Measurement, pp. 1-31.
41. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
42. Sui, D. (1995). A pedagogic framework to link GIS to the intellectual core of geography. Journal of Geography, 94(6), 578-591.
43. Wang, S., & Wu, P. (2007) Examining the Role of Feedback on Self-efficacy and Performance in Web-based Environment. Innovative Computing, Information and Control.
44. Welles, E. (2004). Foreign language enrollments in United States institutions of higher education, ADFL Bulletin, 35(3), 7-26.
45. Wilcox, S. (2004). American Sign Language as a foreign language. Retrieved March 17, 2004, from http://www.unm.edu/~wilrox/ASLFL/asl-fl.html.
46. Wilkinson, S. S. (1981). The relationship of teacher praise and student achievement: A meta-analysis of selected research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 3998A.
47. Yosinaga-ltano, Snyder, L.S. & Mayberry, R. (1996). How deaf and normally hearing students convey meaning within and between written sentences. The Volta Review, 98,(1), 9-38.