The Part and the Whole: Functions of nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 461-469

  Wälde, Sarah ^a   Kehlenbach, Ralph H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE; NUCLEOPORIN; PHENYLALANINE; POLYMER;

CELL NUCLEUS; CELL TRANSPORT; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MACROMOLECULE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CELL NUCLEUS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 77955311720     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Terry L.J., Wente S.R. Flexible gates: dynamic topologies and functions for FG nucleoporins in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Eukaryot Cell. 2009, 8:1814-1827.
2. Brohawn S.G., et al. The nuclear pore complex has entered the atomic age. Structure 2009, 17:1156-1168.
3. D'Angelo M.A., Hetzer M.W. Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:456-466.
4. Elad N., et al. Structural analysis of the nuclear pore complex by integrated approaches. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:226-232.
5. Beck M., et al. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 2007, 449:611-615.
6. Gall J.G. Octagonal nuclear pores. J. Cell Biol. 1967, 32:391-399.
7. Hinshaw J.E., et al. Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 1992, 69:1133-1141.
8. Mohr D., et al. Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes. Embo J. 2009, 28:2541-2553.
9. Kutay U., Hetzer M.W. Reorganization of the nuclear envelope during open mitosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:669-677.
10. Brohawn S.G., Schwartz T.U. Molecular architecture of the Nup84-Nup145C-Sec13 edge element in the nuclear pore complex lattice. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:1173-1177.
11. Kampmann M., Blobel G. Three-dimensional structure and flexibility of a membrane-coating module of the nuclear pore complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:782-788.
12. Nagy V., et al. Structure of a trimeric nucleoporin complex reveals alternate oligomerization states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:17693-17698.
13. Brohawn S.G., et al. Structural evidence for common ancestry of the nuclear pore complex and vesicle coats. Science 2008, 322:1369-1373.
14. Devos D., et al. Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:e380.
15. Denning D.P., et al. Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:2450-2455.
16. Pontius B.W. Close encounters: why unstructured, polymeric domains can increase rates of specific macromolecular association. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993, 18:181-186.
17. Bayliss R., et al. Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking. Cell. 2000, 102:99-108.
18. Yamada J., et al. A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically-disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, in press.
19. Alber F., et al. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 2007, 450:683-694.
20. Alber F., et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007, 450:695-701.
21. Bayliss R., et al. Interaction between NTF2 and xFxFG-containing nucleoporins is required to mediate nuclear import of RanGDP. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293:579-593.
22. Bednenko J., et al. Importin β contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 162:391-401.
23. Ben-Efraim I., Gerace L. Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152:411-417.
24. Strawn L.A., et al. Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:197-206.
25. Patel S.S., et al. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 2007, 129:83-96.
26. Ma J., Yang W. Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:7305-7310.
27. Frey S., Görlich D. A saturated FG-repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes. Cell. 2007, 130:512-523.
28. Frey S., Görlich D. FG/FxFG as well as GLFG repeats form a selective permeability barrier with self-healing properties. Embo J. 2009, 28:2554-2567.
29. Frey S., et al. FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties. Science 2006, 314:815-817.
30. Ribbeck K., Görlich D. The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. Embo J 2002, 21:2664-2671.
31. Rout M.P., et al. Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:622-628.
32. Lim R.Y., et al. Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:9512-9517.
33. Miao L., Schulten K. Transport-related structures and processes of the nuclear pore complex studied through molecular dynamics. Structure 2009, 17:449-459.
34. Lim R.Y., et al. Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex. Science 2007, 318:640-643.
35. Eisele N.B., et al. Ultrathin nucleoporin phenylalanine-glycine repeat films and their interaction with nuclear transport receptors. EMBO Rep 2010, 11:366-372.
36. Akey C.W., Radermacher M. Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 122:1-19.
37. Beck M., et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 2004, 306:1387-1390.
38. Akey C.W., Goldfarb D.S. Protein import through the nuclear pore complex is a multistep process. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 109:971-982.
39. Feldherr C., et al. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 1984, 99:2216-2222.
40. Pante N., Aebi U. Sequential binding of import ligands to distinct nucleopore regions during their nuclear import. Science 1996, 273:1729-1732.
41. Cronshaw J.M., et al. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:915-927.
42. Paradise A., et al. Significant proportions of nuclear transport proteins with reduced intracellular mobilities resolved by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365:50-65.
43. Peters R. Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way. Bioessays 2009, 31:466-477.
44. Isgro T.A., Schulten K. Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-beta. Structure 2005, 13:1869-1879.
45. Jovanovic-Talisman T., et al. Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2009, 457:1023-1027.
46. White E.M., et al. Nucleus-specific and temporally restricted localization of proteins in Tetrahymena macronuclei and micronuclei. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 109:1983-1992.
47. Iwamoto M., et al. Two distinct repeat sequences of Nup98 nucleoporins characterize dual nuclei in the binucleated ciliate tetrahymena. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:843-847.
48. Walther T.C., et al. The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:63-77.
49. Hutten S., et al. The Nup358-RanGAP complex is required for efficient importin α/β-dependent nuclear import. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19:2300-2310.
50. Hutten S., et al. The nuclear pore component Nup358 promotes transportin-dependent nuclear import. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:1100-1110.
51. Sabri N., et al. Distinct functions of the Drosophila Nup153 and Nup214 FG domains in nuclear protein transport. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:557-565.
52. Matsuura Y., Stewart M. Nup50/Npap60 function in nuclear protein import complex disassembly and importin recycling. Embo J. 2005, 24:3681-3689.
53. Fontoura B.M., et al. The nucleoporin Nup98 is a site for GDP/GTP exchange on ran and termination of karyopherin beta 2-mediated nuclear import. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:31289-31296.
54. Shah S., Forbes D.J. Separate nuclear import pathways converge on the nucleoporin Nup153 and can be dissected with dominant-negative inhibitors. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8:1376-1386.
55. Walther T.C., et al. The nucleoporin Nup153 is required for nuclear pore basket formation, nuclear pore complex anchoring and import of a subset of nuclear proteins. Embo J. 2001, 20:5703-5714.
56. Woodward C.L., et al. Integrase interacts with nucleoporin NUP153 to mediate the nuclear import of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 2009, 83:6522-6533.
57. Ben-Efraim I., et al. Karyopherin binding interactions and nuclear import mechanism of nuclear pore complex protein Tpr. BMC Cell Biol. 2009, 10:74.
58. Frosst P., et al. Tpr is localized within the nuclear basket of the pore complex and has a role in nuclear protein export. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 156:617-630.
59. Oka M., et al. The mobile FG nucleoporin nup98 is a cofactor for crm1-dependent protein export. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:1885-1896.
60. Takeda A., et al. Inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export of transcription factors by leukemogenic NUP98 fusion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:16248-16257.
61. Zolotukhin A.S., Felber B.K. Nucleoporins nup98 and nup214 participate in nuclear export of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev. J. Virol. 1999, 73:120-127.
62. Englmeier L., et al. RanBP3 influences interactions between CRM1 and its nuclear protein export substrates. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:926-932.
63. Lindsay M.E., et al. Ran-binding protein 3 is a cofactor for Crm1-mediated nuclear protein export. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:1391-1402.
64. Bernad R., et al. Nup214-Nup88 nucleoporin subcomplex is required for CRM1-mediated 60 S preribosomal nuclear export. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:19378-19386.
65. Hutten S., Kehlenbach R.H. Nup214 is required for CRM1-dependent nuclear protein export in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26:6772-6785.
66. Hood J.K., et al. Nup2p is located on the nuclear side of the nuclear pore complex and coordinates Srp1p/importin-alpha export. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113:1471-1480.
67. Flanagan W.M., et al. Nuclear association of a T-cell transcription factor blocked by FK-506 and cyclosporin A [see comments]. Nature 1991, 352:803-807.
68. Fried H., Kutay U. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60:1659-1688.
69. Goldfarb D.S., et al. Importin alpha: a multipurpose nuclear-transport receptor. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14:505-514.
70. Hutten S., Kehlenbach R.H. CRM1-mediated nuclear export: to the pore and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2007, 17:193-201.
71. Carmody S.R., Wente S.R. mRNA nuclear export at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:1933-1937.
72. Kelly S.M., Corbett A.H. Messenger RNA export from the nucleus: a series of molecular wardrobe changes. Traffic 2009, 10:1199-1208.
73. Stewart M. Ratcheting mRNA out of the nucleus. Mol. Cell. 2007, 25:327-330.
74. Siebrasse J.P., Kubitscheck U. Single molecule tracking for studying nucleocytoplasmic transport and intranuclear dynamics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 464:343-361.
75. Sun C., et al. Single-molecule measurements of importin alpha/cargo complex dissociation at the nuclear pore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:8613-8618.
76. Miao L., Schulten K. Probing a structural model of the nuclear pore complex channel through molecular dynamics. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:1658-1667.
77. Rout M.P., Wente S.R. Pores for thought: nuclear pore complex proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 1994, 4:357-365.
78. Weinreb P.H., et al. NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer's disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry 1996, 35:13709-13715.
79. Milner S.T. Polymer Brushes. Science 1991, 251:905-914.