Camila, the earth, and the sun: Constructing an idea as shared intellectual property

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 619-642

  Radinsky, Josh ^a   Oliva, Sonia ^a   Alamar, Kimberly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Chicago Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Environmental science; Language of science and classrooms; Middle school science; Nature of science; Sociocultural issues

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; LANGUAGE OF SCIENCE; MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE; NATURE OF SCIENCE;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; LINGUISTICS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; SEMANTICS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77954914125     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20354     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alamar, K., & Greene, C. (2003). Science talk: Inviting and integrating students' stories and life experiences within classroom inquiry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL, April 25, 2003.
2. Alamar, K., Greene, C., & Radinsky, J. (2007). The role of peers in promoting student talk and science understandings in class discussions and science talks. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL, April 2007.
3. American Association of University Women (AAUW) Educational Foundation and the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1993). How schools short-change girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
4. Ballenger, C. (1997). Social identities, moral narratives, scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education, 11(1), 1-14.
5. Ballenger, C., & Rosebery, A. (2003). What counts as teacher research? Investigating the scientific and mathematical ideas of children from culturally diverse backgrounds. Teachers College Record, 105(2), 297-314.
6. Barton, A.C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50-73.
7. Barreiro, M., Fedorov, A., Pacanowski, R., & Philander, S.G. (2008). Abrupt climate changes: How freshening of the northern Atlantic affects the thermohaline and wind-driven oceanic circulations. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 36, 33-58.
8. Bem, D.J. (2002). Writing the empirical journal article. In J.M. Darley, M.P. Zanna, & H.L. Roediger III (Eds.), The complete academic: A career guide (pp. 2-26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12.
10. Biggs, N., & Edwards, V. (1991). "I treat them all the same": Teacher-pupil talk in multi-ethnic classrooms. Language and Education, 5(3), 103-115.
11. Brotman, J.S., & Moore, F.M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971-1002.
12. Brown, B.A. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834.
13. Brown, B.A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A "content-first" approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529-533.
14. Bryden, H.L., Longworth, H.R., & Cunningham, S.A. (2005). Slowing of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 25° N. Nature, 438:655-657.
15. Buxton, C.A. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a "low performing" urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695-721.
16. Bybee, R., McRae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865-883.
17. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.
18. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Curry, R., & Mauritzen, C. (2005). Dilution of the northern North Atlantic ocean in recent decades. Science, 308:1772-1774.
20. Crawford, T. (2005). What counts as knowing: Constructing a communicative repertoire for student demonstration of knowledge in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 139-165.
21. Dickson, B., Yashayaev, I., Meincke, J., Turrell, B., Dye, S., & Holfort, J. (2002). Rapid freshening of the deep North Atlantic ocean over the past four decades. Nature, 416:832-837.
22. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Dunbar, K. (2002). Science as category: Implications of in vivo science for theories of cognitive development, scientific discovery, and the nature of science. In P. Caruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegel (Eds.), Cognitive models of science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 705-725). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
26. Enyedy, N. (2003). Knowledge construction and collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 361-408.
27. Fine, M., & Weis, L. (2003). Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations: Re-imagining schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28. Gallas, K. (1994). The languages of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Gallas, K. (1995). How children talk their way into science. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Greeno, J.G. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 79-96). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
31. Greeno, J., & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9-23.
32. Jones, M., & Gerig, T. (1994). Silent sixth-grade students: Characteristics, achievement and teacher expectations. The Elementary School Journal, 95(2), 169-182.
33. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 115- 140). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In: Lynch M. & Woolgar S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Lave, J. (1990). Views of the classroom: Implications for math and science learning research. In: M. Gardner, J. Greeno, & F. Reifet (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Leander, K.M. (2002). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34(2), 193-235.
38. Lemke, J.L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In: J.R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
39. Lemke, J.L. (2000). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, V. Cifarelli, A. Saenz-Ludlow, & A. Vile (Eds.), Semiotic perspectives on mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. McCrone, S. (2005). The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 111-133.
42. Mortimer, E.F., & Scott, P.H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
43. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. Nemirovsky R. Rosebery A. Solomon J. Warren B. (Eds.(2005).Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2005)
45. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
46. Norman, D. (1993). Cognition in the head and in the world: an introduction to the special issue on situated action. Cognitive Science, 17, 1-6.
47. Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 33-56.
48. Oliveira, A.W., & Stradler, T.D. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 634-658.
49. Pea, R.D. (1992). Practices for distributed intelligence and designs for education. In: G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Radinsky, J. (2000). Making sense of complex data: A framework for studying students' development of reflective inquiry dispositions. Learning Sciences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL: 349.
51. Radinsky, J. (2008). Students' roles in group-work with visual data: A site of science learning. Cognition & Instruction, 26(2), 145-194.
52. Radinsky, J., Alamar, K., Leimberer, J., Rodriguez, C., & Trigueros, J. (2005). Science investigations with GIS: Helping students develop the need to know more. Spectrum: Journal of the Illinois Science Teachers' Association, 31(2), 34-42.
53. Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E.M., Gomez, L.M. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405-430.
54. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in smallgroup discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839-858.
55. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Saxe, G.B. (2002). Children's developing mathematics in collective practices: A framework for analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2-3), 275-300.
58. Seixas, P. (1993). The community of inquiry as a basis for knowledge and learning: The case of history. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 305-324.
59. Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2 & 3), 153-161.
60. Singer, M., Radinsky, J., & Goldman, S. (2008). The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes, 45(4), 365-386.
61. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
62. Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1998). Teaching is a cultural activity. American Educator, 22(4), 4-11.
63. Varelas, M., Pappas, C.C., & Rife, A. (2008). Exploring the role of intertextuality in concept construction: Urban second graders make sense of evaporation, boiling, and condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 637-666.
64. Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
65. Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005)."Everyday" and "scientific": Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in learning science. In R. Nemirovsky, A. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 119-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. (1995). "This question is just too, too easy!" Perspectives from the classroom on accountability in science (ERIC Report #ED390658). Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, Center for Applied Linguistics.
67. Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1989). ChecheKonnen: Science and literacy in language minority classrooms (Tech. Rep. No. 7305). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, & Newman.
68. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural theory and practice of education. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
69. Wertsch, J.V., & Rupert, L.J. (1993). The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated agency. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3 & 4), 227-239.
70. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentations and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.
71. Zambrana, R., & Zoppi, I. (2002). Latina students: Translating cultural wealth into social capital to improve academic success. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 11(1/2), 33-53.an