The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review

Journal of Planning Literature

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-23

  Crane, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0033857391     PISSN: 08854122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/08854120022092890     Document Type: Article

References (142)

1. Urban form, energy and the environment: A review of issues, evidence and policy
2. Reorienting metropolitan land use and transportation policies in the USA
3. Mitigating traffic congestion in suburbs: An evaluation of land-use strategies
4. Modeling land use and transportation: An interpretive review for growth areas
5. The transportation effects of neotraditional development
6. Can land use policy really affect travel behavior?
7. The effectiveness of ridesharing incentives: Discrete choice models of commuting in Southern California
8. Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey
9. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods
10. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design
11. Travel by design?
12. Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning
13. The influence of uncertain job location on urban form and the journey to work
14. On form versus function: Will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase it?
15. Does neighborhood design influence travel? A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data
16. Measuring access to basic services in global cities: Descriptive and behavioral approaches
17. Impacts of urban form on travel behavior
18. The second coming of the American small town
19. Transportation, congestion, and density: New insights
20. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: Are there teenage jobs missing in the ghetto?
21. Modeling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: Toward a travel price model
22. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?
23. Beyond density, mode choice, and single-purpose trips
24. Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review
25. Land use impacts on trip generation rates
26. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking
27. The effect of neotraditional design on travel characteristics
28. Transportation's perennial problems
29. Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?
30. Gender differences in metropolitan travel behavior
31. The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time
32. The spatial mismatch hypothesis-some new evidence
33. Accounting for choice set endogeneity in random utility models of recreation demand
34. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior
35. Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior
36. Regional versus local accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its implications for nonwork travel
37. Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives
38. How accessibility shapes land use
39. Accessibility and intraurban travel
40. Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization
41. Industrial restructuring and changing location of jobs
42. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area
43. Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area
44. Market research evaluation of actions to reduce suburban traffic congestion: Commuter travel behavior and response to demand reduction actions
45. Traditional neighborhood development: Will the traffic work?
46. Density and the journey to work
47. Activity, travel, and the allocation of time
48. The rational locator: Why travel times have remained stable
49. Migration and job change: A multinomial logit approach
50. The wage effects of residential location and commuting constraints on employed married women
51. Spatial implications of increases in the female labor force
52. Assessment of influence of land use-transportation system on travel behavior
53. Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs
54. Transit-oriented development in the sunbelt
55. Behavioral responses to congestion: Identifying patterns and socio-economic differences in adoption
56. Measurement error in recreation demand models: The joint estimation of participation, site choice, and site characteristics
57. Downtown population growth and commuting trips: Recent experience in Toronto
58. Job access, commute, and travel burden among welfare recipients
59. A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation
60. Disaggregate models of travel behavior
61. Urban transportation: Policy alternatives
62. Accessibility of neotraditional neighborhoods: A review of design concepts, policies, and recent literature
63. In lieu of required parking
64. Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: Eight case studies
65. Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge
66. Residential density and travel patterns: Review of the literature
67. Neo-traditional neighborhoods: A solution to traffic congestion?
68. Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in U.S. metropolitan areas
69. Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use
70. Parking policies to reduce car traffic in German cities
71. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people
72. Commuting: In search of jobs and residences
73. Regulating traffic by controlling land use: The Southern California experience
74. Physical accessibility as a social indicator
75. The changing commute: A case-study of the jobs-housing relationship over time
76. Suburban parking requirements: A tacit policy for automobile use and sprawl
77. Estimating the travel and parking demand effects of employer-paid parking
78. Participation, trip frequency and site choice: A multinomial-Poisson hurdle model of recreation demand
79. When is a move a migration?
80. Compensation for commutes in labor and housing markets
81. Commutes, quits, and moves