On form versus function: Will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase it?

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 117-126

  Crane, Randall ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEW URBANISM; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORT PLANNING;

EID: 0030480147     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9601500204     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abrams, J. 1986. The form of the (American) city, Lotus International. 50:7-29.
2. Audirac, I., and A. H. Shermyen. 1994. An evaluation of neotraditional design's social prescription: Postmodern placebo or remedy or suburban malaise? Journal of Planning Education and Research 13: 161-173.
3. Beimborn, E., H. Rabinowitz, P. Gugliotta, C. Mrotek, and S. Yan. 1991. The New Suburb: Guidelines for Transit Sensitive Suburban Land Use Design. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Center for Urban Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
5. Ben-Joseph, E. 1995. Changing the residential street scene: Adapting the shared street (Woonerf) concept to the suburban environment. Journal of the American Planning Association 61:504-515.
6. Boles, D. D. 1989. Reordering the suburbs. Progressive Architecture 70:78-91.
7. Boarnet, M., and R. Crane. Forthcoming. L.A. story: A reality check for transit-based housing. Journal of the American Planning Association.
8. Bookout, L. W. 1992a. Neotraditional town planning: Cars, pedestrians, and transit. Urban Land 51:10-15.
9. Bookout, L. W. 1992b. Neotraditional town planning: Toward a blending of design approaches. Urban Land 51: 14-19.
10. Calavita, N. 1993. A little bit of Seaside comes to Southern California. Planning 59:24-25.
11. Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
12. Cervero, R., and R. Gorham. 1995. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association 61:210-225.
13. Crane, R. 1996. Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 62:51-65.
14. Crane, R., and R. Crepeau. 1995. An empirical study of the influence of neighborhood design on travel behavior. Working Paper. Irvine: University of California at Irvine.
15. Deakin, E., and G. Harvey. 1994. Market-based measures to control automobile use. Working Paper. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.
16. Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. 1991. Towns and Town-Making Principles. New York: Rizzoli.
17. Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. 1992. The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly (Winter): 19-50.
18. Dunlop, B. 1989. Coming of age. Architectural Record 177: 96-103.
19. Friedman, B., S. P. Gordon, and J. B. Peers. 1992. The effect of neotraditional neighborhood design on travel characteristics. Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1992 District 6 Annual Meeting.
20. Giuliano, G. 1989. New directions for understanding transportation and land use. Environment and Planning A 21:145-159.
21. Giuliano, G., K. Hwang, and M. Wachs. 1993. Mandatory trip reduction in Southern California: First year results. Transportation Research A 27:125-137.
22. Gómez-Ibáñez, J. A. 1985. Transportation policy as a tool for shaping metropolitan development. In Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 2. JAI Press.
23. Gordon, P., and H. W. Richardson. 1995. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Working Paper. Los Angeles: Lusk Center Research Institute, University of Southern California.
24. Guy, C., and N. Wrigley. 1987. Walking trips to shops in British cities. Transportation Policy and Research 58:63-79.
25. Handy, S. 1991. Neo-traditional development: The debate. Berkeley Planning Journal 6:135-144.
26. Handy, S. 1992. Regional versus local accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment 18:253-267.
27. Handy, S. 1994. Understanding the link between urban form and travel behavior. Working Paper. Austin: School of Architecture, University of Texas at Austin.
28. Hanson, S., and M. Schwab. 1987. Accessibility and intraurban travel. Environment and Planning A 19:735-748.
29. Holtzclaw, J. 1994. Using residential patterns and transit to decrease auto dependence and costs. Working Paper. San Francisco, California:Natural Resources Defense Council.
30. Kaplan, S. H. 1990. The holy grid: A skeptic's view. Planning 56:10-11.
31. Katz, P. 1994. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Kelbaugh, D., ed. 1989. The Pedestrian Pocket Book: A New Suburban Design Strategy. New York: Princeton Architectural Press in Association with the University of Washington.
33. Kitamura, R. P., Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. 1994. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis,.
34. Knack, R. E. 1989. Repent, ye sinners, repent: Neotraditional town planning in the suburbs. Planning 55: 4-13.
35. Kreps, D. M. 1990. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
36. Kulash, W., J. Anglin, and D. Marks. 1990. Traditional neighborhood development: Will the traffic work? Development 21:21-24.
37. Langdon, P. 1994. A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American Suburb. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
38. Leccese, M. 1990. Next stop: Transit-friendly towns. Landscape Architecture 80:47-53
39. Lerner-Lam, E., S. P. Celniker, G. W. Halbert, C. Chellman, and S. Ryan. 1991. Neo-traditional neighborhood design and its implications for traffic engineering. Institute of Transportation Engineers 1991 Compendium of Technical Papers.
40. Los Angeles. 1993. Proposed Land Use/Transportation Policy. Planning Department, City of Los Angeles.
41. McNally, M. G., and S. Ryan. 1993. Comparative assessment of travel characteristics for neotraditional designs. Transportation Research Record 140:67-77.
42. Mohney, D., and K. Easterling, eds. 1991. Seaside: Making a Town in America. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
43. 1000 Friends of Oregon. 1993. The Pedestrian Environment. Volume 4A. Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.
44. Rabiega, W. A. and D. A. Howe. 1994. Shopping travel efficiency of traditional, neotraditional, and cul-de-sac neighborhoods with clustered and strip commercial. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 36th Annual Conference, Tempe, Arizona.
45. Reps, J. W. 1965. The Making of Urban America. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
46. Rowe, P. G. 1991. Making a Middle Landscape. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
47. Ryan, S., and M. G. McNally. 1995. Accessibility of neotraditional neighborhoods: A review of design concepts, policies, and recent literature. Transportation Research A 29:87-105.
48. San Bernardino, City of. 1993. Land Use, Transportation and Air Quality: A Manual for Planning Practitioners. Prepared by The Planning Center, Newport Beach, California.
49. San Diego, City of. 1992. Transit-Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Prepared by Calthorpe Associates, San Diego, California.
50. Small, K. A. 1992. Urban Transportation Economics. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
51. Southworth, M., and P. M. Owens. 1993. The evolving metropolis: Studies of community, neighborhood and street form at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association 59:271-287.
52. Southworth, M., and E. Ben-Joseph. 1995. Street standards and the shaping of suburbia. Journal of the American Planning Association 61:65-81.
53. Stone, J. R., M. D. Foster, and C. E. Johnson. 1992. Neo-traditional neighborhoods: A solution to traffic congestion? In Site Impact Traffic Assessment, eds. N. Rouphail and T. C. Sutaria. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
54. Untermann, R. K. 1984. Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting towns and Neighborhoods for Walking and Bicycling. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
55. Wachs, M. 1993a. Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, urban form, and air quality. Transportation 20:329-354.
56. Wachs, M. 1993b. The role of land use strategies for improving transportation and air quality. Working Paper. University of California, Los Angeles.