Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 414-429

  Lund, Hollie ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; NEIGHBORHOOD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN DESIGN; WALKING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0347535064     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976328     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M., 1999. Housing layout, social interaction, and the place of contact in Abu-Nuseir, Jordan. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:41–73.
2. Alexander, C., 1977. A pattern language, New York:Oxford University Press.
3. Appleyard, D., and Lintell, M., 1972. The environmental quality of city streets:The residents' viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38 (2):84–101.
4. Audirac, I., and Shermyen, A. H., 1994. An evaluation of neo-traditional design's social prescription:Postmodern placebo or remedy for suburban malaise?. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13:161–173.
5. Boarnet, M., and Crane, R., 2001. Travel by design:The influence of urban form on travel, New York:Oxford University Press.
6. Bosselmann, P., Macdonald, E., and Kronemeyer, T., 1999. Livable streets revisited. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65 (2):168–180.
7. Bothwell, S. E., Gindroz, R., and Lang, R. E., 1998. Restoring community through traditional neighborhood design:A case study of Diggs Town public housing. Housing Policy Debate, 9 (1):89–114.
8. Brown, B. B., Burton, J. R., and Sweaney, A. L., 1998. Neighbors, households, and front porches:New urbanist community tool or mere nostalgia?. Environment and Behavior, 30 (5):579–600.
9. Calthorpe, P., 1989. “ Pedestrian pockets:New strategies for suburban growth ”. In The pedestrian pocket book:A new suburban design strategy, Edited by:Kelbaugh, D., 7–20. New York:Princeton Architectural Press.
10. Cervero, R., and Radisch, C., 1995. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods, Berkeley:University of California Transportation Center. (Working Paper UCTC No. 281)
11. Congress for the New Urbanism. 1998. Charter of the New Ur-banism Retrieved July 2003 from http://www.cnu.org/cnu_reports/Charter.pdf
12. Demetsky, M. J., and Perfater, M. A., 1975. Assessment of pedestrian attitudes and behavior in suburban environments. Transportation Research Record, 540:46–55.
13. Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., and Page, G. W., 1995. Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transportation Research Record, 1466:53–62.
14. Frank, L. D., and Pivo, G., 1995. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel:single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record, 1466:44–52.
15. Gordon, S. P., and Peers, J. B., 1993. Designing a community for transportation demand management:The Laguna West pedestrian pocket. Transportation Research Record, 1321:138–145.
16. Handy, S. L., 1992. Regional versus local accessibility:Neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environment, 18 (4):253–267.
17. Handy, S. L., 1996a. Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15:183–198.
18. Handy, S. L., 1996b. Urban form and pedestrian choices:Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, 1552:135–144.
19. Jackson, K. T., 1985. Crabgrass frontier:The suburbanization of the United States, New York:Oxford University Press.
20. Jacobs, J., 1961. The death and life of great American cities, New York:Vintage Books.
21. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., and Laidet, L., 1997. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, 24:125–158.
22. Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R., and Brunson, L., 1998. Fertile ground for community:Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26 (6):823–852.
23. Langdon, P., 1997. Can design make community?. The Responsive Community, 7 (2):25–37.
24. Moudon, A. V., Hess, P. M., Snyder, M. C., and Stanilov, K., 1996. Effects of site design on pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments. Transportation Research Record, 1578:48–55.
25. Plas, J. M., and Lewis, S. E., 1996. Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24 (1):109–143.
26. Rutherford, G. S., McCormack, E., and Wilkinson, M., 1998. Travel impacts of urban form:Implications from an analysis of two Seattle area travel diaries, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
27. Shriver, K., 1996. Influence of environmental design in pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, 1578:64–75.
28. Skjaeveland, O., and Garling, T., 1997. Effects of interactional space on neighbouring. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17:181–198.
29. Skjaeveland, O., Garling, T., and Maeland, J. G., 1996. A multidimensional measure of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24 (3):413–435.
30. Steiner, R. L., 1996. Traditional neighborhood shopping districts:Patterns of use and modes of access, Berkeley:University of California Transportation Center. (Dissertation UCTC No. 37)
31. Whyte, W., 1980. The social life of small urban spaces, Washington, DC:The Conservation Foundation.