Difference in larval type explains patterns of nonsynonymous substitutions in two ancient paralogs of the histone H3 gene in sea stars

Evolution and Development

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 222-230

  Foltz, David W ^a   Mah, Christopher L ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE;

DEMOGRAPHY; DIVERGENCE; ECHINODERM; GENE EXPRESSION; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; MUTATION; PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION; SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CODON; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARVA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; STARFISH;

ANIMALS; CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, INSECT; GENETIC VARIATION; HISTONES; LARVA; PHYLOGENY; STARFISH;

ASTEROIDEA;

EID: 77953946210     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00406.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arndt, A., and Smith, M. J. 1998. Genetic diversity and population structure in two species of sea cucumber: differing patterns according to mode of development. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1053-1064.
2. Ayre, D. J., Minchinton, T. E., and Perrin, C. 2009. Does life history predict past and current connectivity for rocky intertidal invertebrates across a marine biogeographic barrier? Mol. Ecol. 18: 1887-1903.
3. Clément, Y., Tavares, R., and Marais, G. A. B. 2006. Does lack of recombination enhance asymmetric evolution among duplicate genes? Insights from the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Gene 385: 89-95.
4. Conant, G. C., and Wagner, A. 2003. Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13: 2052-2058.
5. Cool, D., Banfield, D., Honda, B.M., and Smith, M. J. 1988. Histone genes in three sea star species: cluster arrangement, transcriptional polarity, and analyses of the flanking regions of H3 and H4 genes. J. Mol. Evol. 27: 36-44.
6. Duret, L. 2002. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12: 640-649.
7. Foltz, D. W. 2003. Invertebrate species with nonpelagic larvae have elevated levels of nonsynonymous substitutions and reduced nucleotide diversities. J. Mol. Evol. 57: 607-612.
8. Foltz, D. W. 2007. An ancient repeat sequence in the ATP synthase b subunit gene of forcipulate sea stars. J. Mol. Evol. 65: 564-573.
9. Foltz, D. W., Hrincevich, A. W., and Rocha-Olivares, A. 2004. Apparent selection intensity for the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene varies with mode of reproduction in echinoderms. Genetica 122: 115-125.
10. Foltz, D. W., andMah, C. L. 2009. Recent relaxation of purifying selection on the tandem-repetitive early-stage histone H3 gene in brooding sea stars. Mar. Genomics 2: 113-118.
11. Foltz, D. W., Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, I., and Kiger, J. R. 2007. Primers for the amplification of nuclear introns in sea stars of the family Asteriidae. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 874-876.
12. Galtier, N., Nabholz, B., Glémin, S., and Hurst, G. D. D. 2009. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 18: 4541-4550.
13. Graham, G. J. 1995. Tandem genes and clustered genes. J. Theor. Biol. 175: 71-87.
14. Hershberg, R., and Petrov, D. A. 2008. Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 287-299.
15. Johnson, M. S., and Black, R. 2006. Effects of mode of reproduction on genetic divergence over large spatial and temporal scales in intertidal snails of the genus Bembicium Philippi (Gastropoda: Littorinidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 89: 689-704.
16. Kim, S. H., and Yi, S. V. 2006. Correlated asymmetry of sequence and functional divergence between duplicate proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 1068-1075.
17. Lee, H. J., and Boulding, E. G. 2009. Spatial and temporal population genetic structure of four northeastern Pacific littorinid gastropods: the effect of mode of larval development on variation at one mitochondrial and two nuclear DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2165-2184.
18. Marzluff, W. F., Sakallah, S., and Kelkar, H. 2006. The sea urchin histone gene complement. Dev. Biol. 300: 308-320.
19. Maxson, R.,Mohun, T.,Gormezano, G., and Kedes, L. 1987. Evolution of late H2A, H2B, and H4 histone genes of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 10569-10582.
20. McEdward, L. R., and Miner, B. G. 2001. Larval and life-Fcycle patterns in echinoderms. Can. J. Zool. 79: 1125-1170.
21. Miller, K. J., and Ayre, D. J. 2008. Population structure is not a simple function of reproductive mode and larval type: insights from tropical corals. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 713-724.
22. Novembre, J. A. 2002. Accounting for background nucleotide composition when measuring codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1390-1394.
23. Pechenik, J. A. 1999. On the advantages and disadvantages of larval stages in benthic marine invertebrate life cycles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 177: 269-297.
24. Rooney, A. P., Piontkivska, H., and Nei, M. 2002. Molecular evolution of the nontandemly repeated genes of the histone 3 multigene family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 68-75.
25. Sawyer, S. A. 1999. GENECONV: A Computer Package for the Statistical Detection of Gene Conversion. Department of Mathematics, Washington University, St. Louis, http://www.math.wustl.edu/~sawyer.
26. Seoighe, C., and Scheffler, K. 2005. Very low power to detect asymmetric divergence of duplicated genes. In A. McLysaght and D. H. Huson (eds.). Comparative Genomics: RECOMB 2005 International Workshop, RCG 2005, Dublin, Ireland, September 18-20, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science/Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 142-152.
27. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51: 492-508.
28. Shimodaira, H., and Hasegawa, M. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246-1247.
29. Sprinkle, J., and Guensburg, T. E. 1997. Early radiation of echinoderms. Paleontol. Soc. Pap. 3: 205-224.
30. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., and Rougemont, J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst. Biol. 57: 758-771.
31. Studer, R. A., and Robinson-Rechavi, M. 2009. How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ? Trends Genet. 25: 210-216.
32. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599.
33. Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D. G. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876-4882.
34. Ward, R. D., Holmes, B. H., and O'Hara, T. D. 2008. DNA barcoding discriminates echinoderm species. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8: 1202-1211.
35. Yang, Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1586-1591.
36. Yang, Z., and Nielsen, R. 2008. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 568-579.
37. Zhang, Z., and Kishino, H. 2004. Genomic background predicts the fate of duplicated genes: evidence from the yeast genome. Genetics 166: 1995-1999.