Spontaneous mutation parameters for arabidopsis thaliana measured in the wild

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1825-1835

  Rutter, Matthew T ^a,b,c   Shaw, Frank H ^c   Fenster, Charles B ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b School of Business   (United States)

^c HAMLINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beneficial mutations; Mutation accumulation lines; Mutation effect; Mutation rate

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; WILD POPULATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 77953883212     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00928.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bataillon T. Shaking the 'deleterious mutations' dogma?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:315-317.
2. Bateman A J. The viability of near-normal irradiated chromosomes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1959, 1:170-180.
3. Bell G, Lechowicz M J. The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. I. Environmental heterogeneity measured by explant trials. J. Ecol. 1991, 79:663-685.
4. Bouché N, Bouchez D. Arabidopsis gene knockout: phenotypes wanted. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4:111-117.
5. Briggs G C, Osmont K S, Shindo C, Sibout R, Hardtke C S. Unequal genetic redundancies in Arabidopsis-a neglected phenomenon?. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:1360-1385.
6. Chang S M, Shaw R G. The contribution of spontaneous mutation to variation in environmental response in Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to nutrients. Evolution 2003, 57:984-994.
7. Davies E K, Peters A D, Keightley P D. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 1999, 285:1748-1751.
8. Denver D R, Morris K, Lynch M, Thomas W K. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 2004, 430:679-682.
9. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley P D. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:610-618.
10. Fisher R A. The genetical theory of natural selection 1930, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
11. Haag-Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X, Macaskill S, Halligan D L, Charlesworth B, Keightley P D. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 2007, 445:82-85.
12. Hall D W, Mahmoudizad R, Hurd A W, Joseph S B. Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: another thousand cell generations. Genet. Res. 2008, 90:229-241.
13. Houle D, Morikawa B, Lynch M. Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 1996, 143:1467-1483.
14. Jaenike J. On the relation between genetic and environmental variability in animals. J. Mol. Evol. 1982, 18:310-314.
15. Johnson T, Barton N. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2005, 360:1411-1425.
16. Johnson N L, Welch B L. Applications of the non-central t-distribution. Biometrika 1940, 31:362-389.
17. Joseph S B, Hall D W. Spontaneous mutations in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected. Genetics 2004, 168:1817-1825.
18. Joseph S B, Kirkpatrick M. Haploid selection in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:592-597.
19. Kavanaugh C M, Shaw R G. The contribution of spontaneous mutation to variation in environmental responses of Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to light. Evolution 2005, 59:266-275.
20. Keightley P D. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1994, 138:1315-1322.
21. Keightley P D, Bataillon T. Multigeneration maximum-likelihood analysis applied to mutation-accumulation experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2000, 154:1193-1201.
22. Keightley P D, Lynch M. Towards a realistic model of mutations affecting fitness. Evolution 2003, 57:683-685.
23. Keightley P D, Ohnishi O. EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1998, 148:753-766.
24. Kondrashov A S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 1988, 336:435-440.
25. Kondrashov A S, Houle D. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation-rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1994, 258:221-227.
26. Kulheim C, Agren J, Jansson S. Rapid regulation of light harvesting and plant fitness in the field. Science 2002, 297:91-93.
27. Lande R. Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 1994, 48:1460-1469.
28. Lynch M. The selective value of alleles underlying polygenic traits. Genetics 1984, 108:1021-1033.
29. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits 1998, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
30. Lynch M, Connery J, Bürger R. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 1995, 146:489-518.
31. Lynch M, Blanchard J, Houle D, Kibota T, Schultz S, Vassilieva L, Willis J. Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 1999, 53:645-663.
32. MacKenzie J L, Saade F E, Le Q H, Bureau T E, Schoen D J. Genomic mutation in lines of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation. Genetics 2005, 171:715-723.
33. Martin G, Lenormand T. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 2006, 60:2413-2427.
34. Mukai T. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 1964, 50:1-19.
35. Otto S P, Orive M E. Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual. Genetics 1995, 141:1173-1187.
36. Poon A, Otto S P. Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations. Evolution 2000, 54:1467-1479.
37. Poon A, Chao L. The rate of compensatory mutation in the bacteriophage phiX174. Genetics 2005, 170:989-999.
38. Roles A J, Conner J K. Fitness effects of mutation accumulation in a natural outbred population of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum): comparison of field and greenhouse environments. Evolution 2008, 62:1066-1075.
39. Rutter M T, Fenster C B. Testing for adaptation to climate in Arabidopsis thaliana: a calibrated common garden approach. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99:529-536.
40. The SAS Institute 2007, SAS,version 9.1.3, Cary, NC
41. Schultz S T, Lynch M, Willis J H. Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:11393-11398.
42. Shabalina S A, Yampolsky L Y, Kondrashov A S. Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:13034-13039.
43. Shaw R G, Byers D L, Darmo E. Spontaneous mutational effects on reproductive traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2000, 155:369-378.
44. Shaw F H, Geyer C J, Shaw R G. A comprehensive model of mutations affecting fitness and inferences for Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 2002, 56:453-463.
45. Shaw R G, Shaw F H, Geyer C. What fraction of mutations reduce fitness? A reply to Keightley and Lynch. Evolution 2003, 57:686-689.
46. Silander O K, Tenaillon O, Chao L. Understanding the evolutionary fate of finite populations: the dynamics of mutational effects. PloS Biol. 2007, 5:922-931.
47. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative
48. Vassilieva L L, Hook A M, Lynch M. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 2000, 54:1234-1246.
49. Verrill S. Confidence bounds for normal and lognormal distribution coefficients of variation 2003, Research Paper 609, USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI
50. Yang H P, Tanikawa A Y, Van Voorhies W A, Silva J C, Kondrashov A S. Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2001, 157:1257-1265.