Kinome-wide interaction modelling using alignment-based and alignment-independent approaches for kinase description and linear and non-linear data analysis techniques

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Lapins, Maris ^a   Wikberg, Jarl E S ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; INTERACTION MODELLING; KINASE INHIBITORS; NON-LINEAR CORRELATIONS; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; SQUARED CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; THERAPEUTIC AGENTS;

AMINO ACIDS; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL DEATH; DISEASES; DISSOCIATION; PROTEINS;

ENZYMES;

PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN KINASES; ROC CURVE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 77953665615     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-339     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298:1912-1934. 10.1126/science.1075762, 12471243.
2. Madhusudan S, Ganesan TS. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy. Clin Biochem 2004, 37:618-635. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.006, 15234243.
3. Griffin JD. Interaction maps for kinase inhibitors. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:308-309. 10.1038/nbt0305-308, 15765084.
4. Fabian MA, Biggs WH, Treiber DK, Atteridge CE, Azimioara MD, Benedetti MG, Carter TA, Ciceri P, Edeen PT, Floyd M, Ford JM, Galvin M, Gerlach JL, Grotzfeld RM, Herrgard S, Insko DE, Insko MA, Lai AG, Lélias JM, Mehta SA, Milanov ZV, Velasco AM, Wodicka LM, Patel HK, Zarrinkar PP, Lockhart DJ. A small molecule-kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:329-336. 10.1038/nbt1068, 15711537.
5. Scapin G. Protein kinase inhibition: different approaches to selective inhibitor design. Curr Drug Targets 2006, 7:1443-1454.
6. Kamb A, Wee S, Lengauer C. Why is cancer drug discovery so difficult?. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007, 6:115-120. 10.1038/nrd2155, 17159925.
7. Daub H, Specht K, Ullrich A. Strategies to overcome resistance to targeted protein kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004, 3:1001-1010. 10.1038/nrd1579, 15573099.
8. Shah NP, Sawyers CL. Mechanisms of resistance to STI571 in Philadelphia chromosome-associated leukemias. Oncogene 2003, 22:7389-7395. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206942, 14576846.
9. Wikberg JE, Lapinsh M, Prusis P. Proteochemometrics: A tool for modelling the molecular interaction space. In Chemogenomics in Drug Discovery - A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective 2004, 289-309. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, Kubinyi H, Müller G.
10. Wikberg JE, Spjuth O, Eklund M, Lapins M. Chemoinformatics taking Biology into Account: Proteochemometrics. In Computational Approaches in Cheminformatics and Bioinformatics 2010, Weinheim: Wiley, Guha R, Bender A, ISBN: 978-0-470-38441-1.
11. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:235-242. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235, 102472, 10592235.
12. Illergård K, Ardell DH, Elofsson A. Structure is three to ten times more conserved than sequence-A study of structural response in protein cores. Proteins 2009, 77:499-508. 10.1002/prot.22458, 19507241.
13. Bamborough P, Drewry D, Harper G, Smith GK, Schneider K. Assessment of chemical coverage of kinome space and its implications for kinase drug discovery. J Med Chem 2008, 51:7898-7914. 10.1021/jm8011036, 19035792.
14. Carter TA, Wodicka LM, Shah NP, Velasco AM, Fabian MA, Treiber DK, Milanov ZV, Atteridge CE, Biggs WH, Edeen PT, Floyd M, Ford JM, Grotzfeld RM, Herrgard S, Insko DE, Mehta SA, Patel HK, Pao W, Sawyers CL, Varmus H, Zarrinkar PP, Lockhart DJ. Inhibition of drug-resistant mutants of ABL, KIT, and EGF receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:11011-11016. 10.1073/pnas.0504952102, 1180625, 16046538.
15. Cohen MS, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Taunton J. Structural bioinformatics-based design of selective, irreversible kinase inhibitors. Science 2005, 308:1318-1321. 10.1126/science1108367, 15919995.
16. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab 2001, 58:131-150.
17. Navia-Vázquez A, Parrado-Hernández E. Support vector machine interpretation. Neurocomputing 2006, (69):1754-1759.
18. Ustün B, Melssen WJ, Buydens LM. Visualisation and interpretation of Support Vector Regression models. Anal Chim Acta 2007, 595:299-309. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.03.023, 17606013.
19. Devos O, Ruckebusch C, Durand A, Duponchel L, Huvenne J-P. Support vector machines (SVM) in near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: Focus on parameters optimization and model interpretation. Chemom Intell Lab 2009, 96:27-33.
20. Lundstedt T, Seifert E, Abramo L, Thelin B, Nyström T, Pettersen J, Bergman R. Experimental design and optimization. Chemometr Intell Lab 1998, 42:3-40.
21. Linusson A, Wold S, Nordén B. Statistical molecular design of peptoid libraries. Mol Divers 1998, 4:103-114. 10.1023/A:1026416430656, 10425633.
22. Alifrangis LH, Christensen IT, Berglund A, Sandberg M, Hovgaard L, Frokjaer S. Structure-property model for membrane partitioning of oligopeptides. J Med Chem 2000, 43:103-13. 10.1021/jm9910932, 10633041.
23. Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, Chan KW, Ciceri P, Davis MI, Edeen PT, Faraoni R, Floyd M, Hunt JP, Lockhart DJ, Milanov ZV, Morrison MJ, Pallares G, Patel HK, Pritchard S, Wodicka LM, Zarrinkar PP. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:127-132. 10.1038/nbt1358, 18183025.
24. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404, 17846036.
25. Sandberg M, Eriksson L, Jonsson J, Sjöström M, Wold S. New chemical descriptors relevant for the design of biologically active peptides. A multivariate characterization of 87 amino acids. J Med Chem 1998, 41:2481-2491. 10.1021/jm9700575, 9651153.
26. Wold S, Jonsson J, Sjöström M, Sandberg M, Rännar S. DNA and peptide sequences and chemical processes multivariately modelled by principal component analysis and partial least-squares projections to latent structures. Anal Chim Acta 1993, 277:239-252.
27. Cruciani G, Baroni M, Carosati E, Clementi M, Valigi R, Clementi S. Peptide studies by means of principal properties of amino acids derived from MIF descriptors. J Chemom 2004, 18:146-155.
28. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Holbrook SR, Kim SH. Prediction of protein folding class using global description of amino acid sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:8700-8704. 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8700, 41034, 7568000.
29. Li ZR, Lin HH, Han LY, Jiang L, Chen X, Chen YZ. PROFEAT: a web server for computing structural and physicochemical features of proteins and peptides from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:W32-W37. 10.1093/nar/gkl305, 1538821, 16845018.
30. Chou KC. Prediction of protein subcellular locations by incorporating quasi-sequence-order effect. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000, 278:477-483. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3815, 11097861.
31. Chou KC. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino-acid-composition. Proteins 2001, 43:246-255. 10.1002/prot.1035, 11288174.
32. Van Heel M. A new family of powerful multivariate statistical sequence analysis techniques. J Mol Biol 1991, 220:877-887. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90360-I, 1880802.
33. Bhasin M, Raghava GP. GPCRpred: an SVM-based method for prediction of families and subfamilies of G-protein coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:W383-W389. 10.1093/nar/gkh416, 441554, 15215416.
34. Gao QB, Wang ZZ. Classification of G-protein coupled receptors at four levels. Protein Eng Des Sel 2006, 19:511-516. 10.1093/protein/gzl038, 17032692.
35. Bhasin M, Raghava GP. Classification of nuclear receptors based on amino acid composition and dipeptide composition. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:23262-23266. 10.1074/jbc.M401932200, 15039428.
36. Bhasin M, Raghava GP. ESLpred: SVM-based method for subcellular localization of eukaryotic proteins using dipeptide composition and PSI-BLAST. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:W414-W419. 10.1093/nar/gkh350, 441488, 15215421.
37. Reczko M, Bohr H. The DEF data base of sequence based protein fold class predictions. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:3616-3619. 308331, 7937069.
38. Hua S, Sun Z. Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:721-728. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.721, 11524373.
39. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab 1987, 2:37-52.
40. Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS). J Chemom 2002, 16:119-128.
41. Geladi P, Kowalski BR. Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 1986, 185:1-17.
42. Lapinsh M, Prusis P, Uhlén S, Wikberg JE. Improved approach for proteochemometrics modeling: application to organic compound--amine G protein-coupled receptor interactions. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:4289-4296. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti703, 16204343.
43. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1999, New York: Springer, Second.
44. Drucker H, Burges CJ, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V. Support Vector Regression Machines. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 1997, 9:155-161.
45. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines 2001, (accessed Feb 1, 2009)., http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
46. Witten IH, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques 2005, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman, 2.
47. Aha D, Kibler D, Albert M. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 1991, 6:37-66.
48. Quinlan RJ. Learning with Continuous Classes. In Proceedings of the 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1992, 343-348. Singapore: World Scientific.
49. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A. Beware of q2!. J Mol Graph Model 2002, 20:269-276. 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1, 11858635.
50. Peterson SD, Schaal W, Karlén A. Improved CoMFA modeling by optimization of settings. J Chem Inf Model 2006, 46:355-64. 10.1021/ci049612j, 16426070.
51. Freyhult E, Prusis P, Lapinsh M, Wikberg JE, Moulton V, Gustafsson MG. Unbiased descriptor and parameter selection confirms the potential of proteo-chemometric modelling. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:50. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-50, 555743, 15760465.