Innovation in vertically related markets

Journal of Industrial Economics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 373-401

  Chen, Yongmin ^a   Sappington, David E M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953546690     PISSN: 00221821     EISSN: 14676451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00414.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2005, 117:701-728. pp
2. Bannerjee S, Lin P. Downstream R&D, Raising Rivals' Costs, and Input Price Contracts. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2003, 21:79-96. pp
3. Bernheim B D, Willig R. 1996, , Mimeo, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, U.S.A
4. Brocas I. Vertical Integration and Incentives to Innovate. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2003, 21:457-488. pp
5. Buehler S. The Promise and Pitfalls of Restructuring Network Industries. German Economic Review 2005, 6:205-228. pp
6. Buehler S, Gärtner D, Halbheer D. Deregulating Network Industries: Dealing with Price-Quality Tradeoffs. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2006, 30:99-115. pp
7. Buehler S, Schmutzler A. Intimidating Competitors - Endogenous Vertical Integration and Downstream Investment in Successive Oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2008, 26:247-265. pp
8. Buehler S, Schmutzler A, Benz M. Infrastructure Quality in Deregulated Industries: Is There an Underinvestment Problem? International Journal of Industrial Organization 2004, 22:253-267. pp
9. Chen Y. On Vertical Mergers and their Competitive Effects. Rand Journal of Economics 2001, 32:667-685. pp
10. Chen Y, Sappington D. 2009, 27:390-402. 'Designing Input Prices to Motivate Process Innovation',, pp
11. Chen Y, Schwartz M. 2007, 'Product Innovation Incentives: Monopoly vs. Competition,' University of Colorado working paper, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A
12. Choi J P. Optimal Tariffs and the Choice of Technology: Discriminatory Tariffs vs. the " Most Favored Nation" Clause. Journal of International Economics 1995, 38:143-160. pp
13. Choi J P, Lee G, Stefanadis C. The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets. Netnomics 2003, 5:21-32. pp
14. Choi J P, Yi S. Vertical Foreclosure with the Choice of Input Specifications. Rand Journal of Economics 2000, 31:717-743. pp
15. Farrell J, Katz M. Innovation, Rent Extraction and Integration in Systems Markets. Journal of Industrial Economics 2000, 48:413-432. pp
16. Gilbert R. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition-Innovation Debate? Innovation Policy and the Economy 2006, Jaffe ALerner JStern S. in, (eds.), National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
17. Gilbert R, Riordan M. Product Improvement and Technological Tying in a Winner-Take-All Market. Journal of Industrial Economics 2007, 55:113-139. pp
18. Mandy D. Killing the Goose that Laid the Golden Egg: Only The Data Know whether Sabotage Pays. Journal of Regulatory Economics 2000, 17:157-172. pp
19. Strategic Review Telecommunications Phase 2 Consultation Documents 2004, Ofcom, Office of Telecommunications, London, England
20. Sandonís J, Faulí-Oller R. On the Competitive Effects of Vertical Integration by a Research Laboratory. International Journal of Industrial Organization 2006, 24:715-731. pp
21. Spengler J. Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy. Journal of Political Economy 1950, 58:347-352. pp
22. Vives X. Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
23. Vives X. Innovation and Competitive Pressure. Journal of Industrial Economics 2008, 56:419-469. pp
24. Wood L, Sappington D. On the Design of Performance Measurement Plans in the Telecommunications Industry. Telecommunications Policy 2004, 28:801-820. pp
25. Zimmerman P. Regional Bell Operating Company Entry into Long-Distance and Non-Price Discrimination against Rival Interexchange Carriers: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2003, 19:269-290. pp