What needs to be done to find the right answer? Source preferences of elementary school children dealing with tasks from different school subjects;Was muss man tun, um sicher die richtige Lösung zu finden? Quellenpräferenzen von Grundschulkindern in verschiedenen Fachkontexten

Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 90-98

  Porsch, Torsten ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a   Pollmeier, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Division of cognitive labor; Elementary school; Evidence; School subject; Sources of knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953240196     PISSN: 00498637     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0049-8637/a000009     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baumert, J. (2002). Deutschland im internationalen Bildungsvergleich. In N. Killius, J. Kluge & L. Reisch (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft der Bildung (pp. 100-150). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
2. Bergstrom, B., Moehlmann, B. & Boyer, P. (2006). Extending the testimony problem: Evaluating the truth, scope, and source of cultural information. Child Development, 77 (3), 531-538.
3. Birch, S. A. J., Vauthier, S. A. & Bloom, P. (2008). Three-and four-year-olds spontaneously use others' past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107, 1018-1034.
4. Bromme, R., & Kienhues, D. (2008). Allgemeinbildung. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Pädagogischen Psychologie (S. 619-628). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
5. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D. & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice (pp. 163-193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D. & Stahl, E. (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 423-444). New York: Springer.
7. Bühner, M. (2006). Einführung in die Test-und Fragebogenkonstruktion. München: Pearson Studium.
8. Danovitch, J. & Keil, F. C. (2004). Should you ask a fisherman or a biologist? Developmental shifts in ways of clustering knowledge. Child Development, 75, 918-931.
9. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
10. Harris, P. L., Pasquini, E. S., Duke, S., Asscher, S. & Pons, F. (2006). Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children's ontology. Developmental Science, 9, 76-96.
11. Keil, F. C., Stein, C., Webb, L., Billings, V. D. & Rozenblit, L. (2008). Discerning the division of cognitive labor: An emerging understanding of how knowledge is clustered in other minds. Cognitive Science, 32 (2), 259-300.
12. Konferenz der Kultusminister der Lär in der Bundesrepublik (2005). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz - Bildungsstandards im Fach Deutsch für den Primarbereich (Jahrgangsstufe 4). München: Wolters Kluwer.
13. Krapp, A. & Lewalter, D. (2007). Development of interests and interest-based motivational orientations. A longitudinal study in vocational school and work settings. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical and methodological implications (pp. 201-232). London: Elsevier.
14. Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15 (5), 381-395.
15. Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U. & Köller, O. (2007). Umgang mit fehlenden Werten in der psychologischen Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 58, 103-117.
16. Lutz, D. J. & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early understanding of the division of cognitive labor. Child Development, 73 (4), 1073-1084.
17. Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K. T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal-external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56-67.
18. Ministerium für Schule und Weiterentwicklung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (2008). Richtlinien und Lehrpläne für die Grundschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Frechen: Ritterbach.
19. Paul, L. H. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10 (1), 135-138.
20. Perner, J. (1999). Theory of mind. In M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Achievements and prospects (pp. 205-230). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
21. Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Baumert, J. (2002). Deutschland im internationalen Bildungsvergleich. In N. Killius, J. Kluge & L. Reisch (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft der Bildung (S. 100-150). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
23. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R. & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern-und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 2, 57-66.
24. Robinson, E. J. & Whitcombe, E. C. (2003). Children's suggestibility in relation to their understanding about sources of knowledge. Child Development, 74, P.
25. Rost, D. H., Dickhäuser, O., Sparfeldt, J. ̈ Schilling, S. (2004). Fachspezifische Selbstkonzepte und Schulleistungen im dimensionalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 43-52.
26. Schilling, S. R., Sparfeldt, J. R. & John, M. (2005). Besser in Mathe- besorgter in Deutsch? Beziehungen zwischen Schulleistungen, schulischen Selbstkonzepten und Prüfungsängsten im Rahmen des I/E-Modells. In S. R. Schilling, J. R. Sparfeldt & C. Pruisken (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Aspekte pädagogisch-psychologischer Forschung (S. 159-178). Münster: Waxmann.
27. Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2009) Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fishlittle-pond effect (BFLPE) across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries, Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2), 403-419.
28. Stahl, E. & Bromme, R. (2007). The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 17, 773-785.
29. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R. & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75, 125-157.
30. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I. & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513-527.
32. Tenorth, H. E. (1994). "Alle alles zu lehren". Möchkeiten und Perspektiven Allgemeiner Bildung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
33. Van Ginkel, J. R. & Van der Ark, L. A. (2005). SPSS syntax for missing value imputation in test and questionnaire data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 152-153.
34. Welch-Ross, M. K. (1999). A mental-state reasoning model of suggestibility and memory source monitoring. In K. Roberts & M. Blades (Eds.), Children's source monitoring. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Whitmire, E. (2004). The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and their information-seeking behavior. Information Processing & Management, 40 (1), 97-111.