Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 227-240

  Harris, Christopher J ^a   Rooks, Deborah L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom management; Elementary and middle school science; Inquiry based science; Science education reform; Science instruction; Science teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952319539     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science & National Science Teachers Association.
3. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
4. Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.
5. Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475-488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Brophy, J. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm (pp. 43-56). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399-413.
9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Bullough, R. V. (1994). Digging at the roots: Discipline, management, and metaphor. Action in Teacher Education, 16(1), 1-10.
12. Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
13. Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of Knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237-258.
14. Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
15. Davis, E., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2004). Scaffolding (Special issue). The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3).
16. Duschl, R. A., Schweinggruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
18. Evertson, C. M., & Neal, K. W. (2006). Looking into learning-centered classrooms: Implications for classroom management. Working paper. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
19. Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 4-20.
20. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., et al. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939.
21. Harris, C. J., & Salinas, I. (2009). Authentic science learning in primary and secondary classrooms. In M. I. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Fostering scientific habits of mind: Pedagogical knowledge and best practices in science education (pp. 125-144). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
22. Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675.
23. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. In B. Fishman, & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the learning sciences. Erlbaum.
24. Huber, R. A., & Moore, C. J. (2001). A model for extending hands-on science to be inquiry based. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 32-42.
25. Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2005). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in science instruction with nonmainstream elementary students. American Educational Research Journal, 42(5), 411-438.
26. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371-387). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (2005). Teaching to promote the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level. In S. M. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 421-474). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
30. Marx, R. W., Freeman, J. G., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1998). The professional development of science teachers. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 667-680). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
31. Marx, R. W., & Harris, C. J. (2006). No child left behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 467-477.
32. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1998). Moving beyond management as sheer compliance: Helping students to develop goal coordination strategies. Educational Horizons, 76, 169-176.
33. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Mergendoller, J. R., Markham, T., Ravitz, J., & Larmer, J. (2006). Pervasive management of project based learning: Teachers as guides and facilitators. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219-290.
36. Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
37. Minstrell, J., & vanZee, E. (2003). Using questioning to assess and foster student thinking. In J. M. Atkin & J. E. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 61-73). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
38. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459-479.
39. Moje, E. B., & Hinchman, K. (2004). Culturally responsive practices for youth literacy learning. In J. Dole & T. Jetton (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 331-350). New York: Guilford Press.
40. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. O'Neill, K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate little scientists? Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234-266.
43. Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423-452.
45. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12.
46. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273-304.
47. Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 283-312.
48. Schwille, K., Givvin, K. B., & Chen, C. (2007). The use of videocases in preservice teacher education: The ViSTA project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans, LA.
49. Singer, J., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165-178.
50. Songer, N. B. (2006). BioKIDS: An animated conversation on the development of curricular activity structures for inquiry science. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 355-369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 128-150.
52. Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
53. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
54. Williams, M., & Linn, M. C. (2002). WISE inquiry in fifth grade biology. Research in Science Education, 32, 415-436.
55. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
56. Woolfolk Hoy, A. W., & Weinstein, C. (2006). Students' and teachers' knowledge and beliefs about classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 181-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.