WISE inquiry in fifth grade biology

Research in Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 415-436

  Williams, Michelle ^a   Linn, Marcia C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Elementary science; Student learning; Technology education

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644587969     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022452719316     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ammon, P., & Black, A. (1998). Development psychology as a guide for teaching and teacher preparation. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 409-448). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393-451). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 17(1), 31-53.
4. diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
6. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, B., Marx, R., & Soloway (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstell, & E. H. V. Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283-315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
7. Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R. D., & Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 7-15.
8. Linn, M. C. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(2), 103-126.
9. Linn, M. C. (in press). WISE design for lifelong learning-Pivotal Cases. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education and communication technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Linn, M. C., Shear, L., Bell, P., & Slotta, J. D. (1999). Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about 'Rats in Space' and 'Deformed Frogs.' Education Technology Research & Development, 47(2), 61-84.
12. Rochelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with collaborative technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.
13. Roth, J. J. (1989). Conceptual understanding and higher level thinking in the elementary science curriculum: Three perspectives. (Report No. SE-051-184). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315303).
14. Songer, N. B. (1998). Can technology bring students closer to science? In K. Tobin, & B. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 333-348). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Spitulnik, M. W., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Using technology to support students' artifact construction in science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 363-381). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. J., Zech, L., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Vygotsky, L. (1972). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, NA: Harvard University Press.
20. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1995). An overview of the ThinkerTools Inquiry Project. (Causal Models Research Group No. CM-95-04). Berkeley, CA: School of Education, University of California at Berkeley.
21. Williams, M. (2001). How students integrate their understanding of plant growth through hands-on science and a Web-based Science Environment (WISE). Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley.