Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 988-1000

  García Pereira, María Jesús ^a   Caballero, Armando ^a   Quesada, Humberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Accuracy; AFLP; Computer simulation; Homoplasy; Phylogenetic inference; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CYTOSINE; GUANINE;

ACCURACY; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; GENETIC DISTANCE; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; BASE COMPOSITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 77951591731     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp315     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Althoff DM, Gitzendanner MA, Segraves KA. 2007. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst Biol. 56:477-484.
2. Arnason U, Gullberg A, Janke A, Kullberg M, Lehman N, Petrov EA, Väinölä R. 2006. Pinniped phylogeny and a new hypothesis for their origin and dispersal. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 41:345-354.
3. Bensch S, Akesson M. 2005. Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals? Mol Ecol. 14:2899-2914.
4. Brouat C, McKey D, Douzery EJP. 2004. Differentiation in a geographical mosaic of plants coevolving with ants: phylogeny of the Leonardoxa africana complex (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Mol Ecol. 13:1157-1171.
5. Bussel JD, Waycott M, Chappill JA. 2005. Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers as characters for phylogenetic inference. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 7:3-26.
6. Caballero A, Quesada H. 2010. Homoplasy and distribution of AFLP fragments: an analysis in silico of the genome of different species. Mol Biol Evol. Advance Access published January 7, 2010, doi:10.1093/molbev/msq001.
7. Caballero A, Quesada H, Rolán-Alvarez E. 2008. Impact of AFLP fragment size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci. Genetics 179:539-554.
8. Campbell D, Bernatchez L. 2004. Generic scan using AFLP markers as a means to assess the role of directional selection in the divergence of sympatric whitefish ecotypes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:945-956.
9. Cantarel BL, Morrison HG, Pearson W. 2006. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phyloge-netic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 23:2090-2100.
10. Chen F-C, Li W-H. 2001. Genomic divergences between humans and other homininds and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet. 68:444-456.
11. Dasmahapatra KK, Hoffman JI, Amos W. 2009. Pinniped phyloge-netic relationships inferred using AFLP markers. Heredity 103:168-177.
12. Despres L, Gielly L, Redoutet B, Taberlet P. 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 27:185-196.
13. El-Rabey HA, Badr A, Schaffer-Pregl R, Martin W, Salamini F. 2002. Speciation and species separation in Hordeum L. (Poaceae) resolved by discontinuous molecular markers. Plant Biol. 4:567-575.
14. Fulton TL, Strobeck C. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Arctoidea (Carnivora): effect of missing data on supertree and supermatrix analyses of multiple gene data sets. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 41:165-181.
15. Giannasi N, Thorpe RS, Malhotra A. 2001. The use of amplified fragment length polymorphim in determining species trees at fine taxonomic levels: analysis of a medically important snake, Trimeresurus albolabris. Mol Ecol. 10:419-426.
16. Gort G, Koopman WJM, Stein A. 2006. Fragment length distributions and collision probabilities for AFLP markers. Biometrics 62:1107-1115.
17. Hansen M, Kraft T, Christiansen M, Nilsson N-O. 1999. Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theor Appl Genet. 98:845-852.
18. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 22:160-174.
19. Holland B, Clarke AC, Meudth HM. 2008. Optimizing automated AFLP scoring parameters to improve phylogenetic resolution. Syst Biol. 57:347-366.
20. Hollingsworth PM, Ennos RA 2004. Neighbor joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure. Heredity 92:490-498.
21. Johns GC, Avise JC 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol. 15:1481-1490.
22. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Vol.3. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press. p. 21-132.
23. Karlin S, Burge C 1995. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet. 11:283-290.
24. Karp A, Seberg A, Buiatti M. 1996. Molecular techniques in the assessment of botanical diversity. Ann Bot. 78:143-149.
25. Koblmüller S, Duftner N, Sefc KM, Aibara M, Stipacek M, Blanc M, Egger B, Sturmbauer C 2007. Reticulate phylogeny of gastropod-shell-breeding cichlids from Lake Tanganyika\the result of repeated introgressive hybridization. BMC Evol Biol. 7:7.
26. Koopman WJM. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Syst Biol. 54:197-217.
27. Koopman WJM, Gort G. 2004. Significance tests and weighted values for AFLP similarities, based on Arabidopsis in Silico AFLP fragment length distributions. Genetics 167:1915-1928.
28. Kosman E, Leonard KJ. 2005. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Mol Ecol. 14:415-424.
29. Kumar S, Gadagkar SR 2000. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies. J Mol Evol. 51:544-553.
30. Lockhart PJ, Steel MJ, Hendy MD, Penny D. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 11:605-612.
31. Luo R, Hipp AL, Larget B. 2007. A bayesian model of AFLP marker evolution and phylogenetic inference. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 6:11.
32. Marhold K, Lihová J, Perný M, Bleeker W. 2004. Comparative ITS and AFLP analysis of diploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) taxa from closely related polyploid complexes. Ann Bot. 93:507-520.
33. Mechanda SM, Baum BR, Johnson DA, Arnason JT. 2004. Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP™ bands in Echinacea-implications for comparative biological studies. Genome 47: 15-25.
34. Meudt HM, Clarke AC. 2007. Almost forgotten or lattest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci. 12:106-117.
35. Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol. 14:389-394.
36. Nei M, Li W-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 76:5269-5273.
37. O'Hanlon PC, Peakall R. 2000. A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments. Mol Ecol. 9:815-816.
38. Pellmyr O, Segraves KA, Althoff DM, Balcázar-Lara M, Leebens-Mack J. 2007. The phylogeny of yuccas. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 43:493-501.
39. Peng J, Korol AB, Fahima T, Röder MS, Ronin YI, Li YC, Nevo E. 2000. Molecular genetic maps in wild Emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides: genome-wide coverage, massive negative interference, and putative quasi-linkage. Genome Res. 10:1509-1531.
40. Peters JL, Constandt H, Ney P, Cnops G, Zethof J, Zabeau M, Gerats T. 2001. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127:1579-1589.
41. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P. 2005. Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 6:847-859.
42. Rambaut A, Grassly NC. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput Appl Biosci. 13:235-238. (Pubitemid 27249927)
43. Robinson DF, Foulds LR. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci. 53:131-147.
44. Rombauts S, Van der Peer Y, Rouzé P. 2003. AFLP in Silico, simulating AFLP fingerprints. Bioinformatics 19:776-777.
45. Rouppe van der Voort JN, van Zandvoort P, van Eck HJ, Folkertsma RT, Hutten RCB, Draaistra J, Gommers FJ, Jacobsen E, Helder J, Bakker J. 1997. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Mol Gen Genet. 255:438-447.
46. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. 1992. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol. 35:367-375.
47. Savelkoul PHM, Aarts HJM, de Haas J, Dijkshoorn L, Duim B, Otsen M, Rademaker JLW, Schouls L, Lenstra JA. 1999. Amplified-fragment length polymorphism analysis: the state of the art. J Clin Microbiol. 37:3083-3091.
48. Simmons MP, Zhang L-B, Webb CT, Müller K. 2007. A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference. Mol Mol Phylogenet Evol. 42:528-542.
49. Sites JW, Marshall JC. 2003. Delimiting species: a renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:462-470.
50. Soria-Carrasco V, Talavera G, Igea J, Castresana J. 2007. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 23:2954-2956.
51. Sullivan JP, Lavoué S, Arnegard ME, Hopkins CD. 2004. AFLPs resolve phylogeny and reveal mitochondrial introgression within a species flock of African electric fish (Momyroidea: teleostei). Evolution 58:825-841.
52. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
53. Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldán-Ruiz I. 2002. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol. 11:139-151.
54. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
55. Young WP, Schupp JM, Keim P. 1999. DNA methylation and AFLP marker distribution in the soybean genome. Theor Appl Genet. 99:785-790.