Optimizing automated AFLP scoring parameters to improve phylogenetic resolution

Systematic Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 347-366

  Holland, Barbara R ^a   Clarke, Andrew C ^a   Meudt, Heidi M ^a,b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b MUSEUM OF NEW ZEALAND TE PAPA TONGAREWA   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

AFLP; Amplified fragment length polymorphism; Automated scoring; Error rates; Phylogenetic resolution; Phylogeny; Scoring parameters

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANTAGO; SWEET POTATO;

ALLELES; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; IPOMOEA BATATAS; PHYLOGENY; PLANTAGO; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 45849151123     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150802044037     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albach, D. C. 2007. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms and sequence data in the phylogenetic analysis of polyploids: Multiple origins of Veronica cymbalaria (Plantaginaceae). New Phytol. 176:481-498.
2. Althoff, D. M., M. A. Gitzendanner, and K. A. Segraves. 2007. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: A comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst. Biol. 56:477-484.
3. Bensch, S., and M. Åkesson. 2005. Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: Why so few animals? Mol. Ecol. 14:2899-2914.
4. Bikandi, J., R. San Millán, A. Rementeria, and J. Garaizar. 2004. In silico analysis of complete bacterial genomes: PCR, AFLP-PCR and endonuclease restriction. Bioinformatics 20:798-799.
5. Bonin, A., E. Bellemain, P. B. Eidesen, F. Pompanon, C. Brochmann, and P. Taberlet. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13:3261-3273.
6. Bonin, A., D. Ehrich, and S. Manel. 2007. Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: A toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol. Ecol. 16:3737-3758.
7. Carstens, B. C., and L. L. Knowles. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: An example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol. 56:400-411.
8. Degnan, J. H., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:762-768.
9. Degnan, J. H., and L. A. Salter. 2005. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 59:24-37.
10. Després, L., L. Gielly, B. Redoutet, and P. Taberlet. 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27:185-196.
11. Green, R. C. 2005. Sweet potato transfers in Polynesian prehistory. Pages 43-62 in The sweet potato in Oceania: A reappraisal. Ethnology Monographs 19/Oceania Monograph 56 (C. Ballard, P. Brown, R. M. Bourke, and T. Harwood, eds.). Ethnology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; United States/Oceania Publications; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
12. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
13. Holland, B. R., F. Delsuc, and V. Moulton. 2005. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: Using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods. Syst. Biol. 54:66-76.
14. Hollingsworth, P. M., and R. A. Ennos. 2004. Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure. Heredity 92:490-498.
15. Huson, D. H., and D. Bryant. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:254-267.
16. Kilian, B., H. Özkan, O. Deusch, S. Effgen, A. Brandolini, J. Kohl, W. Martin, and F. Salamini. 2007. Independent wheat B and G genome origins in outcrossing Aegilops progenitor haplotypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:217-227.
17. Koblmüller, S., N. Duftner, K. M. Sefc, M. Aibara, M. Stipacek, M. Blanc, B. Egger, and C. Sturmbauer. 2007. Reticulate phylogeny of gastropod-shell-breeding cichlids from Lake Tanganyika - The result of repeated introgressive hybridization. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:7.
18. Koopman, W. J. M. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Syst. Biol. 54:197-217.
19. Kosman, E., and K. J. Leonard. 2005. Similarity coefficients for molecular markers in studies of genetic relationships between individuals for haploid, diploid, and polyploid species. Mol. Ecol. 14:415-424.
20. Kubatko, L. S., and J. H. Degnan. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56:17-24.
21. Liu, L., and D. K. Pearl. 2007. Species trees fromgene trees: Reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56:504-514.
22. Marhold, K., J. Lihová, M. Perný, and W. Bleeker. 2004. Comparative ITS and AFLP analysis of diploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) taxa from closely related polyploid complexes. Ann. Bot. 93:507-520.
23. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2005. Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375-376.
24. Meudt, H. M. 2006. Monograph of Ourisia (Plantaginaceae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 77:1-188.
25. Meudt, H. M., and A. C. Clarke. 2007. Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci. 12:106-117.
26. Meudt, H. M., and B. B. Simpson. 2006. The biogeography of the austral, subalpine genus Ourisia (Plantaginaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic evidence: South American origin and dispersal to New Zealand and Tasmania. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87:479-513.
27. Mueller, U. G., and L. L. Wolfenbarger. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:389-394.
28. Pellmyr, O., K. A. Segraves, D. M. Althoff, M. Balcázar-Lara, and J. Leebens-Mack. 2007. The phylogeny of yuccas. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43:493-501.
29. Pelser, P. B., B. Gravendeel, and R. van der Meijden. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: The closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:613-628.
30. Pompanon, F., A. Bonin, E. Bellemain, and P. Taberlet. 2005. Genotyping errors: Causes, consequences and solutions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:847-859.
31. Qin, L., P. Prins, J. T. Jones, H. Popeijus, G. Smant, J. Bakker, and J. Helder. 2001. GenEST, a powerful bidirectional link between cDNA sequence data and gene expression profiles generated by cDNA-AFLP. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:1616-1622.
32. Spooner, D. M., K. McLean, G. Ramsay, R. Waugh, and G. J. Bryan. 2005a. A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:14694-14699.
33. Spooner, D. M., I. E. Peralta, and S. Knapp. 2005b. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54:43-61.
34. Sullivan, J. P., S. Lavoué, M. E. Arnegard, and C. D. Hopkins. 2004. AFLPs resolve phylogeny and reveal mitochondrial introgression within a species flock of African electric fish (Mormyroidea: Teleostei). Evolution 58:825-841.
35. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts.
36. Taylor, D. J., and W. H. Piel. 2004. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1534-1537.
37. Tremetsberger, K., T. F. Stuessy, G. Kadlec, E. Urtubey, C. M. Baeza, S. G. Beck, H. A. Valdebenito, C. de Fátima Ruas, and N. I. Matzenbacher. 2006. AFLP phylogeny of South American species of Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Syst. Bot. 31:610-626.
38. Vekemans, X., T. Beauwens, M. Lemaire, and I. Roldán-Ruiz. 2002. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol. Ecol. 11:139-151.
39. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.