Homoplasy and distribution of AFLP fragments: An analysis in silico of the genome of different species

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1139-1151

  Caballero, Armando ^a   Quesada, Humberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

AFLP; DNA compositional heterogeneity; Fragment length distribution; Genomic signature; Homoplasy; Isochores

Indexed keywords

RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARABIDOPSIS; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENOME SIZE; HOMOPLASY; INDEL MUTATION; ISOCHORE; NONHUMAN; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN MOTIF; RESTRICTION SITE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BASE COMPOSITION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA RESTRICTION ENZYMES; GENOME; INDEL MUTATION; ISOCHORES; MOSAICISM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 77951539347     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Koornneef M, Lister C, Dean C, van den Bosch N, Pot J, Kuiper MTR. 1998. Development of an AFLP-based linkage map of Ler, Col and Cvi Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and construction of a Ler/Cvi recombinant imbred line population. Plant J. 14:259-271.
2. Althoff DM, Gitzendanner MA, Segraves KA. 2007. The utility of amplified fragment length polymorphisms in phylogenetics: a comparison of homology within and between genomes. Syst Biol. 56:477-484.
3. Becker J, Vos P, Kuiper M, Salamini F, Heun M. 1995. Combined mapping of AFLP and RFLP markers in barley. Mol Gen Genet. 249:65-73.
4. Bensch S, Akesson M. 2005. Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals? Mol Ecol. 14:2899-2914.
5. Bernaola-Galván P, Oliver JL, Carpena P, Clay O, Bernardi G. 2004. Quantifying intrachromosomal GC heterogeneity in prokaryotic genomes. Gene 333:121-133.
6. Bernardi G, Olofsson B, Filipski J, Zerial M, Salinas J, Cuny G, Meunier-Rotival M, Rodier F. 1985. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science 228:953-958.
7. Blanc G, Barakat A, Guyot R, Cooke R, Delseny M. 2000. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell 12:1093-1102.
8. Bonin A, Ehrich D, Manel S. 2007. Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol. 16:3737-3758.
9. Burge C, Campbell AM, Karlin S. 1992. Over-and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:1358-1362.
10. Bussel JD, Waycott M, Chappill JA. 2005. Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers for phylogenetic inference. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 7:3-26.
11. Caballero A, Quesada H, Rolán-Alvarez E. 2008. Impact of AFLP fragment size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci. Genetics 179:539-554.
12. Cartwright RA 2005. DNA assembly with gaps (Dawg): simulating sequence evolution. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl 3):iii31-iii38.
13. Castiglioni P, Pozzi C, Heun M, Terzi V, Muller KJ, Rohde W, Salamini F. 1998. An AFLP-based procedure for the efficient mapping of mutations and DNA probes in barley. Genetics 149:2039-2056.
14. El-Rabey HA Badr A, Schaffer-Pregl R Martin W, Salamini F. 2002. Speciation and species separation in Hordeum L. (Poaceae) resolved by discontinuous molecular markers. Plant Biol. 4:567-575.
15. Garćia-Pereira MJ, Caballero A, Quesada H. 2009. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergente and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets. Mol Biol Evol. Advance Access published December 21, 2009, doi:10.1093/molbev/msp315.
16. Gort G, Koopman WJM, Stein A. 2006. Fragment length distributions and collision probabilities for AFLP markers. Biometrics 62:1107-1115.
17. Gort G, Koopman WJM, Stein A, van Eeuwijk FA. 2008. Collision probabilities for AFLP bands, with an application to simple measures of genetic similarity. J Agric Biol Environ Salt. 13:177-198.
18. Gort G, van Hintum V, van Eeuwijk F. 2009. Homoplasy corrected estimation of genetic similarity from AFLP bands, and the effect of the number of bands on the precision of estimation. Theor Appl Genet. 119:397-416.
19. Hansen M, Kraft T, Christiansen M, Nilsson N-O. 1999. Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theor Appl Genet. 98:845-852.
20. Innan H, Terauchi R, Kahl G, Tajima F. 1999. A method for estimating nucleotide diversity from AFLP data. Genetics 151:1157-1164.
21. Jernigan RW, Baran RH. 2002. Pervasive properties of the genomic signature. BMC Genomics. 3:23.
22. Jukes TH, Cantor CR 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press. p. 21-132
23. Karlin S, Burge C 1995. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet. 11:283-290.
24. Karlin S, Mrázek J, Campbell AM. 1997. Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriology. 179:3899-3913.
25. Keim P, Schupp JM, Travis SE, Clayton K, Zhu T, Shi L, Ferreria A, Webb DM. 1997. A high-density soybean genetic map based on AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 37:537-543.
26. Koopman WJM. 2005. Phylogenetic signal in AFLP data sets. Syst Biol. 54:197-217.
27. Koopman WJM, Gort G. 2004. Significance tests and weighted values for AFLP similarities, based on Arabidopsis in silico AFLP fragment length distributions. Genetics 167:1915-1928.
28. Lindner KR, Seeb JE, Habicht C, et al. 2000. Gene-centromere mapping of 312 loci in pink salmon by half-tetrad analysis. Genome 43:538-549.
29. Mechanda SM, Baum BR, Johnson DA, Arnason JT. 2004. Sequence assessment of comigrating AFLP™ bands in Echinacea\implications for comparative biological studies. Genome 47:15-25.
30. Mendelson TC, Shaw KL. 2005. Use of AFLP markers in surveys of arthropod diversity. Methods Enzymol. 395:161-177.
31. Meudt HM, Clarke AC. 2007. Almost forgotten or lattest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci. 12:106-117.
32. Montero LM, Salinas J, Matassi G, Bernardi G. 1990. Gene distribution and isochore organization in the nuclear genome of plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:1859-1867.
33. Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL. 1999. AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol. 14:389-394.
34. O'Hanlon PC, Peakall R. 2000. A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments. Mol Ecol. 9:815-816.
35. Oliver JL, Bernaola-Galván P, Carpena P, Román- Roldán R. 2001. Isochore chromosome maps of eukaryotic genomes. Gene 276:47-56.
36. Oliver JL, Carpena P, Hackenberg M, Bernaola-Galván P. 2004. IsoFinder: computational prediction of isochores in genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Web Server issue):W287-W292.
37. Peng J, Korol AB, Fahima T, Röder MS, Ronin YI, Li YC, Nevo E. 2000. Molecular genetic maps in wild Emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides: genome-wide coverage, massive negative interference, and putative quasi-linkage. Genome Res. 10:1509-1531.
38. Peters JL, Constandt H, Neyt P, Cnops G, Zethof J, Zabeau M, Gerats T. 2001. A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127:1575-1589.
39. Petrov DA. 2002. Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 61:533-546.
40. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P. 2005. Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 6:847-859.
41. Rombauts S, van de Peer Y, Rouzé P. 2003. AFLP in silico, simulating AFLP fingerprints. Bioinformatics 19:776-777.
42. Rouppe van der Voort JN, van Zandvoort P, van Eck HJ, Folkertsma RT, Hutten RCB, Draaistra J, Gommers FJ, Jacobsen E, Helder J, Bakker J. 1997. Use of allele specificity of comigrating AFLP markers to align genetic maps from different potato genotypes. Mol Gen Genet. 255:438-447.
43. Salinas J, Matassi G, Montero LM, Bernardi G. 1998. Compositional compartmentalization and compositional patterns in the nuclear genomes of plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:4269-4285.
44. van Eck HJ, van der Voort JR, Draaistra JR, Van Zandvoort P, Van Enckevort E, Seger B, Peleman J, Jacobsen E, Helder J, Bakker J. 1995. The inheritance of chromosomal localization of AFLP markers in non-inbred potato offspring. Mol Breed. 1:397-410.
45. Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldán-Ruiz I. 2002. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol. 11:139-151.
46. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Freijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:4407-4414.
47. Wang Y, Hill K, Sing S, Kari L. 2005. The spectrum of genomic signatures: from dinucleotides to chaos game representation. Gene 346:173-185.
48. Young WP, Schupp JM, Keim P. 1999. DNA methylation and AFLP marker distribution in the soybean genome. Theor Appl Genet. 99:785-790.
49. Zhang R, Zhang C-T. 2004. Isochore structures in the genome of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Evol. 59:227-238.