Primary teachers' particle ideas and explanations of physical phenomena: Effect of an in-service training course

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 629-652

  Papageorgiou, George ^a   Stamovlasis, Dimitrios ^a   Johnson, Phil Michael ^b  

^a DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

In service training; Misconception; Particle ideas; Physical phenomena; Primary school; Primary teachers; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951144254     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690902738016     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Andersson, B. (1986). Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
2. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-55.
3. Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers' confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 357-369.
4. Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393-410.
5. Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1-25.
6. Baker, R. (1994). Teaching science in primary schools: What knowledge do teachers need? Research in Science Education, 24, 31-40.
7. Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children's views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157-174.
8. Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382.
9. Barker, V. (2002). Beyond misconceptions: Students' misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
10. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64-66.
11. Boz, N., & Boz, Y. (2008). A qualitative case study of prospective chemistry teachers' knowledge about instructional strategies: Introducing particulate theory. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 135-156.
12. Çalik, M. (2008). Facilitating students' conceptual understanding of boiling using a four-step constructivist teaching method. Research in Science and Technological Education, 26(1), 59-74.
13. Çalik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.
14. Costu, B., & Ayas, A. (2005). Evaporation in different liquids: Secondary students' conceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 75-97.
15. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science research into children's ideas. New York: Routledge.
16. Field, A. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161-180.
17. Gabel, D., & Bunce, D. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301-326). New York: Macmillan.
18. Gabel, D., & Samuel, K. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
19. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
20. Gomez, E. J., Benarroch, A., & Marin, N. (2006). Evaluation of the degree of coherence found in students' conceptions concerning the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 577-578.
21. Greek Ministry of National Education and Religion Affairs. (1985). National program of study for primary education. Athens: Greek Publishing Association of textbooks.
22. Greek Pedagogical Institute. (2003). National program of study for primary and secondary education: Science. Athens: Greek Pedagogical Institute.
23. Griffiths, A., & Preston, K. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
24. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 93-105.
26. Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding in teaching science and technology in primary schools. Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Science Education.
27. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189-212). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
28. Hatcher, L., & Stepansky, E. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
29. Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1997). Pupils' ideas on conservation during changes in the state of water. Research in Science and Technology Education, 15(1), 53-70.
30. Hatzinikita, V., Koulaidis, V., & Hatzinikitas, A. (2005). Modeling pupils' understanding and explanations concerning changes in matter. Research in Science Education, 35, 471-495.
31. Hewstone, M., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.). (2001). Introduction to social psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers' changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1787-1811.
33. Jarvis, T., Pell, A., & Mckeon, F. (2003). Changes in primary teachers' science knowledge and understanding during a two year in-service programme. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(1), 17-42.
34. Johnson, P. M. (1996). What is a substance? Education in Chemistry, 33, 41-42.
35. Johnson, P. M. (1998a). Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393-412.
36. Johnson, P. M. (1998b). Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1. Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 567-583.
37. Johnson, P. M. (1998c). Children's understanding of state involving the gas state, Part 2. Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 695-709.
38. Johnson, P. M. (2000). Children's understanding of substances, Part 1. Recognizing chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 719-737.
39. Johnson, P. M. (2002). Children's understanding of substances, Part 2. Explaining chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1037-1054.
40. Johnson, P. M., & Gott, R. (1996). Constructivism and evidence from children's ideas. Science Education, 80, 561-577.
41. Johnson, P. M., & Papageorgiou, G. (in press). Rethinking the introduction of particle theory: A substance-based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
42. Jurievi, M., Glaar, S. A., Puko, C. R., & Devetak, I. (2008). Intrinsic motivation of pre-service primary school teachers for learning chemistry in relation to their academic achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 87-107.
43. Kang, N. H. (2007). Elementary teachers' epistemological and ontological understanding of teaching for conceptual learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1292-1317.
44. Kokkotas, P., Vlachos, I., & Koulaidis, V. (1998). Teaching the topic of the particulate nature of matter in prospective teachers' training courses. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 291-303.
45. Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
46. Krnel, D., Watson, R., & Glazar, S. A. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 257-289.
47. Krugar, C., Summers, M., & Palacio, D. (1990). A survey of primary school teachers' conceptions of force and motion. Educational Research, 32(2), 83-95.
48. Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C., Berkheimer, C., & Blakeslee, T. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249-270.
49. Liang, L., & Gabel, D. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143-1162.
50. Liu, X. (2001). Synthesizing research on conceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1), 55-81.
51. Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1995). Some primary school teachers' understanding of the Earth's place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8(1), 101-129.
52. Martin, O., Mullis, I., Gonzales, E., & Chrostowski, S. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Boston College, MA, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre.
53. Mertens, D. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. London: Sage.
54. Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers' diagnosis and understanding of students' preconceptions. Science Education, 87, 849-867.
55. Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Educational Research, 49(4), 415-430.
56. Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
57. Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 26, 99-147.
58. Paik, S.-H., Kim, H.-N., Cho, B.-K., & Park, J.-W. (2004). K-8th grade Korean students' conceptions of "changes of state" and "conditions for changes of state". International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 207-224.
59. Papageorgiou, G., & Johnson, P. M. (2005). Do particle ideas help or hinder pupils' understanding of phenomena? International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1299-1317.
60. Papageorgiou, G., & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teachers' views on fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 237-247.
61. Papageorgiou, G., Johnson, P. M., & Fotiades, F. (2008). Explaining melting and evaporation below boiling point. Can software help particle ideas? Research in Science and Technological Education, 26(2), 165-183.
62. Papageorgiou, G., Kogianni, E., & Makris, N. (2007). Primary teachers' views and descriptions regarding some science activities. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 52-60.
63. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.
64. Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in primary teachers' learning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 89-111.
65. Pereira, M. P., & Pestana, E. M. (1991). Pupils' representations of models of water. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 313-319.
66. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioural research: A correlational approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Russell, T., Harlen, W., & Watt, D. (1989). Children's ideas about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 11(special issue), 566-576.
68. Sakonidis, H., Kaldrimidou, M., & Tzekaki, M. (2006). Experts' and novices' primary teachers' intervening in students' mathematical activity: An insight. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 323). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University of Prague.
69. Schibeci, R. A., & Hickey, R. (2000). Is it natural or processed? Elementary school teachers' and conceptions about materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1154-1170.
70. Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553-568.
71. Smith, C., Anderson, C., Krajcik, J., & Coppola, B. (2004). Implications of research on children's learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement, Center for Education, National Research Council.
72. Smith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1-20.
73. Stavy, R. (1990). Children's conception of changes in the state of matter from liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247-266.
74. Summers, M. (1992). Improving primary school teachers' understanding of science concepts: Theory into practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 25-40.
75. Summers, M., & Krugar, C. (1992). Research into English primary teachers' understanding of the concept of energy. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6, 95-111.
76. Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Ozkan, O. (2004). Turkish preservice science teachers' understanding of science and their confidence in teaching it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(1), 57-68.
77. Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students; conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447-467.
78. Woolnough, B. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.