Modeling pupils' understanding and explanations concerning changes in matter

Research in Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 471-495

  Hatzinikita, Vassilia ^a   Koulaidis, Vasilios ^b   Hatzinikitas, Agapitos ^c  

^a HELLENIC OPEN UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PELOPONNESE   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

Change; Classification; Explanations of change; Particulate nature of matter; Pupil's models

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144473756     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-004-8321-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, B. (1986a). The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils' preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 155-171.
2. Andersson, B. (1986b, January). Pupils' reasoning in science. Invited paper, ICASE symposium, annual meeting of Association for Science Education, University of York, York, UK.
3. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conception of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
4. Andersson, B., & Renström, L. (1983a). How Swedish pupils, age 12-15, explain the 'copper-pipe' problem (Working paper). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.
5. Andersson, B., & Renström, L. (1983b). How Swedish pupils, age 12-15, explain the 'exhaust' problem (Working paper). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.
6. Berzonsky, M. (1971). The role of familiarity in children's explanations of physical causality. Child Development, 42, 705-706.
7. Blalock, H. M. (1987). Social statistics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
8. Brosnan, T. (1990). Categorising macro and micro explanations of natural change. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Light, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Proceedings of the seminar relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. A central problem in secondary science education (pp. 198-211). Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-β Press.
9. Christidou, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1996). Children's models of the ozone layer and ozone depletion. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 421-436.
10. Christidou, V., Koulaidis, V., & Christidis, T. (1997). Children's use of metaphors in relation to their models: the case of the ozone layer and its depletion. Research in Science Education, 16(4), 541-552.
11. De Vos, W. (1990). Seven thoughts on teaching molecules. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Light, W. de Vos, & A. J. Waarlo (Eds.), Proceedings of the seminar relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. A central problem in secondary science education (pp. 163-716). Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-β Press.
12. Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
13. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. Research into children's ideas. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Erickson, B., & Nosanchuk, T. (1985). Understanding data. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
15. Halbwachs, F. (1971). Causalité linéaire et causalité circulaire en physique (Linear causality and circular causality in Physic). In M. Bunge, F. Halbwachs, T. Kühn, J. Plaget, & L. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Les théories de la causalité (Theories of causality) (pp. 44-47). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
16. Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1995). Pupils' models of explanation on changes of matter. In R. M. Janiuk (Ed.), Research in chemical education and its influence on teaching chemical education. Proceedings of 3rd European conference on research in chemical education (pp. 72-79). Lublin, Poland.
17. Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1998). Représentations des élèves de l'école primaire sur les changements des systèmes physico-chimiques: Système de classification (Representations of elementary school pupils on changes in physical-chemical systems: Classification system). Didaskalia, 12, 91-112.
18. Johnson, P. (1998a). Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393-412.
19. Johnson, P. (1998b). Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state: evaporation and condensation below the boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 695-709.
20. Johsua, S., & Dupin, J. J. (1993). Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathématiques (Introduction in science and mathematics education). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
21. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Martinand, J. L. (1986). Connâtre et transformer la matière (Knowing and transforming the matter). Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
23. Méheut, M. (1989). Des représentations des élèves au concept de réaction chimique: Premières étapes (Pupils' representations on the concept of chemical reaction: First steps). Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens, 716, 997-1011.
24. Méheut, M., & Chomat, A. (1990). Les limites de l'atomisme enfantin: Expérimentation d'une démarche d'élaboration d'un modèle particulaire par les élèves de collège (The limits of children's atomism: an attempt to help children build up a particulate model of matter). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(4), 417-437.
25. Méheut, M., Saltiel, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Pupils' (11-12 years olds) conceptions of combustion. European Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 83-93.
26. Nussbaum, J. (1985). The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 124-144). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
27. Peterfalvi, B. (2001). Obstacles et situations didactiques en sciences: processus intellectuels et constatations. L'exemple des transformations de la matière (Obstacles and didactical situations: Intellectual process and constatations. The example of transformations of matter). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Rouen, Department of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Rouen, France.
28. Peterfalvi, B., & Verin, A. (1996). Tackling conceptual obstacles to acquiring scientific knowledge in a constructivist-teaching model. In A. Giordan & Y. Girault (Eds.), The new learning models, their consequences for the teaching of biology, health and environment (pp. 125-134). Nice, France: Z-Editions.
29. Pfundt, H. (1981). The atom - the final link in the division process or the first building block? Chimica Didactica, 7, 75-94.
30. Piaget, J. (1927). La causalité physique chez l'enfant (Physical causality in childhood). Paris, France: Librairie F. Alcan.
31. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1978). Le développement des quantités physiques chez l'enfant (4th ed.) (The child's construction of quantities). Paris, France: Delachaux et Niestlé.
32. Prieto, T., Blanco, A., & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14-year-old pupils about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463.
33. Rahayu, S., & Tytler, R. (1999). Progression in primary school children's conceptions of burning: Toward an understanding of the concept of substance. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 295-312.
34. Scholium, B. (1981). Chemical change (Working paper 27). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
35. Scholium, B., Osborne, R., & Lambert, J. (1981). Heating and cooling (Working paper 38). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
36. Séré, M. G. (1986). Children's conceptions of the gaseous state prior to teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 413-425.
37. Solomonidou, C., & Stavridou, H. (2000). From inert object to chemical substance: young pupils' initial conceptions and conceptual development during an introductory experimental chemistry sequence. Science Education, 84, 382-400.
38. Tiberghien, A., & Weil-Barais, A. (1987). Les modèles spontanés dans la pensée commune et enfantine (Spontaneous models in common sense and childrens' thinking). In A. Giordan & J. L. Martinand (Eds.), Actes des IXèmes jounales internationales sur la communication, l'éducation et la culture scientifiques et industrielles: Modèles et simulation (Proceedings of the 9th international days on communication, education and scientific and industrial culture: models and simulation) (pp. 47-55). Paris, France: UF de Didactique, Université Paris XII.
39. Viennot, L. (1993). La causalité dans le raisonnement des étudiants (Causality in students' reasoning). Didaskalia, 1, 13-27.
40. Weil-Barais, A., & Vergnaud, G. (1990). Pupils' conceptions in physics and mathematics: Biases and helps. In J. P. Caverni, J. M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 69-84). North-Holland, Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.