Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 610-621

  Sih, Andrew ^a   Bolnick, Daniel I ^b   Luttbeg, Barney ^c   Orrock, John L ^d   Peacor, Scott D ^e   Pintor, Lauren M ^f   Preisser, Evan ^g   Rehage, Jennifer S ^h   Vonesh, James R ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^h FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; INVASIVE SPECIES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NATIVE SPECIES; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REINTRODUCTION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SIMILARITY INDEX;

EID: 77951118799     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18039.x     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Abrams P A. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. Am. Nat. 1995, 146:112-134.
2. Abrams P A. The role of indirect effects in food webs. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics 1996, 371-395. Polis G AWinemiller K O. In:, (eds),, Chapman and Hall, pp.
3. Agrawal A A, Kotanen P M. Herbivores and the success of non-native plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:712-715.
4. Banks P B, Dickman C R. Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naïveté. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:229-230.
5. Berger J. Carnivore expatriation and holarctic prey: narrowing the deficit in ecological effectiveness. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1105-1116.
6. Berger J. Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 2001, 291:1036-1039.
7. Binckley C A, Resetarits W J. Functional equivalence of non-lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvae. Oikos 2003, 102:623-629.
8. Blackburn T M. Avian extinction and mammalian introductions on oceanic islands. Science 2004, 305:1955-1958.
9. Blossey B, Notzhold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants - a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:887-889.
10. Blumstein D T. The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 2006, 112:209-217.
11. Blumstein D T, Daniel J C. Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners. Behav. Ecol. 2002, 13:657-663.
12. Blumstein D T, Fernandez-Juricic E. The emergence of conservation behavior. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:1175-1177.
13. Bolker B. Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 2003, 84:1101-1114.
14. Brodin T. Behavioural and life history effects of predator diet cues during ontogeny in damselfly larvae. Oecologia 2006, 148:162-169.
15. Brown G E. Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fish. 2003, 4:227-234.
16. Brown J S, Kotler B P. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:999-1014.
17. Bruno J F. Insights into biotic interactions from studies of species invasions. Insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography 2005, 13-40. Sax D F. In:, (eds),, Sinauer, pp.
18. Byers J A. American pronghorns: social adaptations and ghosts of predators past 1997, Univ. of Chicago Press
19. Callaway R M, Ridenour W M. Novel weapons and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:436-443.
20. Caro T. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals 2005, Univ. of Chicago Press
21. Reptilian extinctions: the last ten thousand years 1992, Case T J. (eds), Chapman and Hall
22. Chalcraft D R, Resetarits W J. Predator identity and ecological impacts: functional redundancy or functional diversity? Ecology 2003, 84:2407-2418.
23. Chivers D P, Smith R J F. Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 1998, 5:338-352.
24. Chivers D P. Learned recognition of heterospecific alarm cues enhances survival during encounters with predators. Behaviour 2002, 139:929-938.
25. Colautti R I. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:721-733.
26. Coss R J. Effects of relaxed natural selection on the evolution of behavior. Geographic variation of behavior: an evolutionary perspective 1999, 108-208. Foster SEndler J. In:, (eds),, Oxford Univ. Press, pp.
27. Courtenay W R, Moyle P B. Crimes against biodiversity: the lasting legacy of fish introductions. Trans. N. Am. Wildlife Nat. Resour. Conf. 1992, 57:365-372.
28. Cox J G, Lima S L. Naïveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:674-680.
29. Creel S, Christianson D. Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:194-201.
30. Crooks K R, Soule M. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 1999, 400:563-566.
31. Daehler C C. Darwin's naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am. Nat. 2001, 158:324-330.
32. Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection 1859, John Murray
33. Diamond J. Overview of recent extinctions. Conservation for the twenty-first century 1989, 37-41. Western DPearl M. In:, (eds),, Oxford Univ. Press, pp.
34. Diamond J, Case T J. Overview: introductions, extinctions, exterminations, and invasions. Community ecology 1986, 65-79. Diamond J, Case T J. In:, (eds),, Harper and Row, pp.
35. Dickman C R. Impact of non-native generalist predators on the native fauna of Australia. Wildlife Biol. 1996, 2:185-195.
36. Dill L M. The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio). I. The stimulus for escape. Anim. Behav. 1974, 22:711-722.
37. Duncan R P. High predictability in introduction outcomes and the geographical range size of introduced Australian birds: a role for climate. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001, 70:621-632.
38. Elton C. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants 1958, Methuen
39. Facon B. A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:130-135.
40. Fagan W F, Hurd L E. Hatch density variation of a generalist arthropod predator - population consequences and community impact. Ecology 1994, 75:2022-2032.
41. Freeman A S, Byers J E. Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations. Science 2006, 313:831-833.
42. Gamradt S C, Kats L B. Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10:1155-1162.
43. Goldschmidt T. Cascading effects of the introduced Nile perch on the detritivorous phytoplanktivorous species in the sublittoral areas of Lake Victoria. Conserv. Biol. 1993, 7:686-700.
44. Griffin A S. Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:1317-1326.
45. Grosholz E D, Ruiz G M. Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 8:700-705.
46. Grosholz E D. The impacts of a nonindigenous marine predator in a California bay. Ecology 2000, 81:1206-1224.
47. Gurevitch J, Padilla D K. Are invasive species a major cause of species extinctions? Trends. Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:470-474.
48. Huang C F, Sih A. Experimental studies on behaviorally mediated, indirect interactions through a shared predator. Ecology 1990, 71:1515-1522.
49. Jedrzejewski W. Responses of bank voles to odors of seven species of predators - experimental-data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 1993, 68:251-257.
50. Jeschke J M, Strayer D L. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:7190-7202.
51. Jones M E. Is anti-predator behaviour in Tasmanian eastern quolls (Dasyurus viverrinus) effective against introduced predators? Anim. Conserv. 2004, 7:155-160.
52. Kats L B, Dill L M. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 1998, 5:361-394.
53. King C M. Weasel. The handbook of New Zealand mammals 1990, King C M. In:, (ed.),, Oxford Univ. Press
54. Kinnison M T. Eco-evolutionary vs habitat contributions to invasion in salmon: experimental evaluation in the wild. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:405-414.
55. Knapp R A. Effects of nonnative fish and habitat characteristics on lentic herpetofauna in Yosemite National Park, USA. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 121:265-279.
56. Knapp R A, Matthews K R. Non-native fish introductions and the decline of the mountain yellow-legged frog from within protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:428-438.
57. Kolbe J J. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 2004, 431:177-181.
58. Korpimäki E. Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundances - is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation. Oecologia 1991, 88:552-561.
59. Kotler B P. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 1991, 72:2249-2260.
60. Kotler B P. Predator facilitation - the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1992, 29:199-206.
61. Langerhans R B, DeWitt T J. Plasticity constrained: over-generalized induction cues cause maladaptive phenotypes. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002, 4:857-870.
62. Lima S L. Life in a multipredator environment - some considerations for antipredatory vigilance. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1992, 29:217-226.
63. Lima S L. Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv. Study Behav. 1998, 27:215-290.
64. Lodge D M. Biological invasions - lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1993, 8:133-137.
65. Losos J B. Rapid temporal reversal in predator-driven natural selection. Science 2006, 314:1111.
66. Luisa A M O. Wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues of ambush snake predators to avoid overestimating risk inside refuges. Anim. Behav. 2004, 67:647-653.
67. Luttbeg B, Schmitz O J. Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. Am. Nat. 2000, 155:669-683.
68. Macdonald D W, Harrington L A. The American mink: the triumph and tragedy of adaptation out of context. N. Z. J. Zool. 2003, 30:421-441.
69. Mack R N. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10:689-710.
70. Marchetti M P. Invasive species profiling? Exploring the characteristics of non-native fishes across invasions stages in California. Freshwater Biol. 2004, 49:646-661.
71. Matsuda H. Effects of predator-specific defense on community complexity. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:628-638.
72. McCallum H. Modeling the impact of predation on reintroductions of bridled nailtail wallabies. Wildlife Res. 1995, 22:163-171.
73. Mitchell C E. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:726-740.
74. Moyle P B. Fish introductions into North America: patterns and ecological impact. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii 1986, 27-43. Mooney H ADrake J A. In:, (eds),, Springer, pp.
75. Naddafi R. Non-lethal predator effects on the feeding rate and prey selection of the exotic zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Oikos 2007, 116:1289-1298.
76. Orrock J L. Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk. Behav. Ecol. 2004, 15:433-437.
77. Orrock J L. Consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predators on meta-communities of competing prey. Ecology 2008, 89:2426-2435.
78. Pangle K L. Large nonlethal effects of an invasive invertebrate predator on zooplankton population growth rate. Ecology 2007, 88:402-412.
79. Peacor S D, Werner E E. Trait-mediated indirect interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology 1997, 78:1146-1156.
80. Peacor S D, Werner E E. The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:-3908.
81. Peacor S D, Werner E E. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 2003, 84:1083-1100.
82. Peacor S D, Werner E E. How dependent are species-pair interaction strengths on other species in the food web? Ecology 2004, 85:2754-2763.
83. Peckarsky B L. Revisiting the classics: considering noncomsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interaction interactions. Ecology 2008, 89:2416-2425.
84. Petranka J W. Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians - use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35:420-425.
85. Power M E. Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass and stream algae - dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology 1985, 66:1448-1456.
86. Preisser E L, Bolnick D I. The many faces of fear: categorizing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations. PLOS One 2008, 3:e2465.
87. Preisser E L. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 2005, 86:501-509.
88. Preisser E L. Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 2007, 88:2744-2751.
89. Rao D V S. Comprehensive review of the records of the biota of the Indian Seas and introduction of non-indigenous species. Aquat. Conserv. - Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 2005, 15:117-146.
90. Rehage J S. Behavioral responses to a novel predator and competitor of invasive mosquitofish and their non-invasive relatives (Gambusia sp.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005, 57:256-266.
91. Relyea R A. How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 2003, 84:1827-1839.
92. Ricciardi A, Atkinson S K. Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:781-784.
93. Ricciardi A, Mottiar M. Does Darwin's naturalization hypothesis explain fish invasions. Biol. Invas. 2006, 8:1403-1407.
94. Rodriguez L F. Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol. Invas. 2006, 8:927-939.
95. Rudnick D A. Patterns and processes of biological invasion: the Chinese mitten crab in San Francisco Bay. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 4:249-262.
96. Salo P. Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2007, 274:1237-1243.
97. Savidge J A. Extinction of an island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology 1987, 68:660-668.
98. Sax D F. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:465-471.
99. Schlaepfer M A. Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:241-246.
100. Schoeppner N M, Relyea R A. Damage, digestion and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defenses. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:505-512.
101. Schmitz O J. From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 2008, 89:2436-2445.
102. Sih A. Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 1986, 67:434-441.
103. Sih A. Game theory and predator-prey response races. Game theory and animal behavior 1998, 221-238. Dugatkin L AReeve H K. In:, (eds),, Oxford Univ. Press, pp.
104. Sih A, Christensen B. Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim. Behav. 2001, 61:379-390.
105. Sih A, Wooster D E. Prey behavior, prey dispersal and predator impacts on stream prey. Ecology 1994, 75:1199-1207.
106. Sih A. Predation, competition and prey communities - a review of field experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:269-311.
107. Sih A. Effects of predatory sunfish on the density, drift, and refuge use of stream salamander larvae. Ecology 1992, 73:1418-1430.
108. Sih A. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:350-355.
109. Sih A. Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish-salamander system. Anim. Behav. 2003, 65:29-44.
110. Simberloff D, Gibbons L. Now you see them, now you don't - population crashes of established introduced species. Biol. Invas. 2004, 6:161-172.
111. Smith G R. Behavioral responses of American toad and bullfrog tadpoles to the presence of cues from the invasive fish, Gambusia affinis. Biol. Invas. 2008, 10:743-748.
112. Snyder W E, Evans E W. Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2006, 37:95-122.
113. Soluk D A, Collins N C. Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies - facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 1988, 52:94-100.
114. Strauss S Y. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:354-371.
115. Thorson J M. Direct and indirect cues of predatory risk and patch use by fox squirrels and thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Behav. Ecol. 1998, 9:151-157.
116. Torchin M E, Mitchell C E. Parasites, pathogens, and invasions by plants and animals. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:183-190.
117. Torchin M E. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 2003, 421:628-630.
118. Vermeij G J. When biotas meet: understanding biotic interchange. Science 1991, 253:1099-1104.
119. Warkentin K M. Adaptive plasticity in hatching age - a response to predation risk tradeoffs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92:3507-3510.
120. Werner E E, Peacor S D. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 2003, 84:1083-1100.
121. The big kill: declining biodiversity in America's lakes and rivers 1994, Wilcove D SBean M J. (eds), Environ. Defense Fund
122. Williamson M. Biological invasions 1996, Chapman and Hall
123. Wooster D, Sih A. A review of the drift and activity responses of stream prey to predator presence. Oikos 1995, 73:3-8.
124. Wu S H. Plant invasions in Taiwan: insights from the flora of causal and naturalized alien plants. Div. Distr. 2004, 10:349-362.