Consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of predators on metacommunities of competing prey

Ecology

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2426-2435

  Orrock, John L ^a,b   Grabowski, Jonathan H ^c   Pantel, Jelena H ^d   Peacor, Scott D ^e   Peckarsky, Barbara L ^f   Sih, Andrew ^g   Werner, Earl E ^h  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Competition; Consumptive effects; Habitat loss; Invasion; Metacommunity; Metapopulation; Migration; Nonconsumptive effects; Predator prey interactions

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COEXISTENCE; COLONIAL BREEDING; COLONIZATION; CRYPSIS; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HABITAT LOSS; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; MORTALITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; INVERTEBRATE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; INVERTEBRATES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 54549114522     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-1024.1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abrams, P. A., R. Crcssman, and V. Krivan. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. American Naturalist 169:505-518.
2. Amarasekare, P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters 6: 1109-1122.
3. Bascompte, J., and R. V. Sole. 1998. Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 195:383-393.
4. Brinkerhoff, R. J., N. M. Haddad, and J. L. Orrock. 2005. Corridors and olfactory predator cues affect small mammal behavior. Journal of Mammalogy 86:662-669.
5. Brown, J. S., J. W. Laundre, and M. Gurung. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. Journal of Mammalogy 80:385-399.
6. Chase, J. M., P. Amarasekare, K, Cottenie, A. Gonzales, R. D. Holt, M. Holyoak, M. F. Hoopes, M. A. Leibold, M. Loreau, N. Mouquet, J. B. Shurin, and D. Tilman. 2005. Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. Pages 335-354 in M. Holyoak, M. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
7. Crooks, K. R., and M. E. Soule. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563-566.
8. Diehl, S., S. D. Cooper, K. W. Kratz, R. M. Nisbet, S. K. Roll, S. W. Wiseman, and T. M. Jenkins. 2000. Effects of multiple, predator-induced behaviors on short-term producer-grazer dynamics in open systems. American Naturalist 156:293-313.
9. Englund, G., and P. A. Hamback. 2007. Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:30-35.
10. Fagan, W. F., M. A. Lewis, M. G. Neubert, and P. van den Driessche. 2002. Invasion theory and biological control. Ecology Letters 5:148-157.
11. Fraser, D. F., J. F. Gilliam, M. P. MacGowan, C. M. Arcaro, and P. H. Guillozet. 1999. Habitat quality in a hostile river corridor. Ecology 80:597-607.
12. Gilliam, J. F., and D. F. Fraser. 2001. Movement in corridors: enhancement by predation threat, disturbance, and habitat structure. Ecology 82:258-273.
13. Haddad, N. M., D. R. Bowne, A. Cunningham, B. J. Danielson, D. J. Levey, S. Sargent, and T. Spira. 2003. Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84:609-615.
14. Hanski, I. A., and M. E. Gilpin. 1997. Metapopulation biology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
15. Hanski, I., A. Moilanen, and M. Gyllenberg. 1996. Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist 147:527-541.
16. Hastings, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theoretical Population Biology 18: 363-373.
17. Holt, R. D. 1987. Prey communities in patchy environments. Oikos 50:276-290.
18. Holt, R. D. 1997. From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of spatial heterogeneity. Pages 149-164 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
19. Holt, R. D. 2002. Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecological Research 17:261-273.
20. Holt, R. D., J. Grover, and D. Tilman. 1994. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. American Naturalist 144:741-771.
21. Holt, R. D., and J. H. Lawton. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:495-520.
22. Holyoak, M., M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
23. Keane, R. M., and M. J. Crawley. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:164-170.
24. Krivan, V., and E. Sirot. 2002. Habitat selection by two competing species in a two-habitat environment. American Naturalist 160:214-234.
25. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control, Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
26. Lima, S. L., and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation - a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:619-640.
27. Loehle, C., and B. L. Li. 1996. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt revisited. Ecological Applications 6:784-789.
28. May, R. M. 2001. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
29. Melian, C. J., and J. Bascompte. 2002. Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecology Letters 5:37-46.
30. Minoretti, N., and W. W. Weisser. 2000. The impact of individual ladybirds (Coccinella septempunctata, Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) cell aphid colonies, European Journal of Entomology 97:475-479.
31. Mouquet, N., M. F. Hoopes, and P. Amarasekare. 2005. The world is patchy and heterogeneous! Trade-off and sourcesink dynamics in competitive metacommunities. Pages 237-262 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
32. Nee, S., and R. M. May. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations - habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:37-40.
33. Nee, S., R. M. May, and M. P. Hassell. 1997. Two-species metapopulation models. Pages 123-147 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
34. Peckarsky, B. L., P. A. Abrams, D. Bolnick, L. M. Dill, J. H. Grabowski, B. Luttbeg, J. L. Orrock, S. D. Peacor, E. L. Preisser, O. J. Schmitz, and G. C. Trussell. 2008. Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 89:2416-2425.
35. Peckarsky, B. L., and A. R. Mcintosh. 1998. Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. Oecologia 113:565-576.
36. Polis, G. A., W. B. Anderson, and R. D. Holt. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematica 28:289-316.
37. Prakash, S., and A. M. de Roos. 2002. Habitat destruction in a simple predator-prey patch model: How predators enhance prey persistence and abundance. Theoretical Population Biology 62:231-249.
38. Preisser, E. L., D. I. Bolnick, and M. F. Benard. 2005. Scared to death? the effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501-509.
39. Ray, C., M. Gilpin, and A. T. Smith. 1991. The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:123-134.
40. Reed, J. M., and S. H. Levine. 2005. A model for behavioral regulation of metapopulation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 183:411-423.
41. Resetarits, W. J., Jr., C. A. Binckley, and D. R. Chalcraft. 2005. Habitat selection, species interactions, and processes of community assembly in complex landscapes: a metacommunity perspective. Pages 374-398 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, editors. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
42. Sih, A., P. Crowley, M. McPeek, J. Petranka, and K. Strohmeier. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities - a review of field experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:269-311.
43. Sih, A., and D. E. Wooster. 1994. Prey behavior, prey dispersal, and predator impacts on stream prey. Ecology 75:1199-1207.
44. Smith, A. T., and M. M. Peacock. 1990. Conspecific attraction and the determination of mctapopulation colonization rates. Conservation Biology 4:320-323.
45. Stankowich, T., and D. T. Blumstein. 2005. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proceedings of the Royal Society 272:2627-2634.
46. Stephens, D. W., and J. R. Krebs. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
47. Swihart, R. K., Z. L. Feng, N. A. Slade, D. M. Mason, and T. M. Gehring. 2001. Effects of habitat destruction and resource supplementation in a predator-prey metapopulation model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 210:287-303.
48. Tilman, D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 13:805-831.
49. Tilman, D., C. L. Lehman, and C. J. Yin. 1997. Habitat destruction, dispersal, and deterministic extinction in competitive communities. American Naturalist 149:407-435.
50. Walde, S. J., and W. W. Murdoch. 1988. Spatial density dependence in parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 33:441-166.
51. Werner, E. E., and D. J. Hall. 1988. Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: the foraging rate-predation risk trade-off. Ecology 69:1352-1366.
52. Werner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor. 2003. A review of traitmediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083-1100.
53. Wooster, D., and A. Sih. 1995. A review of the drift and activity responses of stream prey to predator presence. Oikos 73:3-8.