Diagnostic value of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for breast carcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 469-479

  Yu, Ying Hua ^a   Liang, Chi ^a   Yuan, Xi Zi ^b  

^a GUANGXI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF GUANGXI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Breast biopsies; Breast neoplasms; Meta analysis; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VACUUM ASSISTED BREAST BIOPSY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACUUM;

EID: 77950689245     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0750-1     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Gotzsche PC, Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355:129-134
2. 2. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340-1342 (Pubitemid 33016501)
3. 3. Elmore JG, Moceri VM, Barton MB, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:10891096 (Pubitemid 28227478)
4. Kopans DB (1992) The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:521-526
5. 5. Brett J, Austoker J, Ong G (1998) Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last screening appointment. J Public Health Med 20:396-403 (Pubitemid 29017247)
6. 6. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E (1996) Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 312:273-276 (Pubitemid 26040802)
7. 7. Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C, Hawes E (1999) Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer 85: 1114-1118 (Pubitemid 29115591)
8. 8. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J et al (1998) Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer 82:679-688 (Pubitemid 28090279)
9. 9. Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G et al (2007) Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 103:85-91 (Pubitemid 46653270)
10. Mueller-Holzner E, Frede T, Daniaux M et al (2007) Ultrasoundguided core needle biopsy of the breast: does frozen section give an accurate diagnosis? Breast Cancer Res Treat 106(3):399-406
11. 11. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PHM, Buskens E et al (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 82(5): 1017-1021 (Pubitemid 30128853)
12. Verkooijen HM, Borel Rinkes IH, Peeters PH et al (2001) Impact of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy on diagnosis and surgical treatment of nonpalpable breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 27: 244249
13. 13. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al (1997) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203:151-157 (Pubitemid 27142723)
14. 14. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al (1996) Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:341346 (Pubitemid 26036295)
15. 15. Parker SH, Burbank F (1996) A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 200:11-20 (Pubitemid 26197334)
16. 16. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738-744 (Pubitemid 26309056)
17. 17. Liberman L, Gougoutas CA, Zakowski MF et al (2001) Calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy: comparison of breast biopsy methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:165-172 (Pubitemid 32578073)
18. Fahrbach K, Sledge I, Cella C et al (2006) A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274: 63-73
19. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AWS et al (2006) Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:9
20. 20. Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM et al (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:9 (Pubitemid 38994353)
21. 21. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B (1993) Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: dataanalytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 12: 1293-1316 (Pubitemid 23230833)
22. 22. Lau J, Ioannidis P, Balk EM et al (2001) Diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review of the accuracy and clinical effect of current technologies. Ann Emerg Med 37:453-460 (Pubitemid 32417570)
23. 23. Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C et al (1994) Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 120:667-676 (Pubitemid 24106180)
24. 24. Suzuki S, Moro-oka T, Choudhry NK (2004) The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 57:461-469 (Pubitemid 38758049)
25. Westwood ME, Whiting PF, Kleijnen J (2005) How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis? BMC Med Res Methodol 8:20
26. 26. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-634 (Pubitemid 27387172)
27. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME (2000) Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology 215(3):694-697
28. 28. Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Linnau K, Stadler F, Jackman RJ (2004) A stereotactic 11-gauge vacuumassisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy 1. RSNA 232(3):897-903 (Pubitemid 39100279)
29. 29. Klem D, Jacobs HK, Jorgensen R, Facenda LS, Baker DA, Altimari A et al (1999) Stereotactic breast biopsy in a community hospital setting. Discuss Am Surg 65(8):737-741 (Pubitemid 29344935)
30. Killebrew LK, Oneson RH (2006) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of a vacuum-assisted percutaneous intact specimen sampling device to a vacuum-assisted core needle sampling device for breast biopsy: initial experience. Breast J 12(4):302
31. 31. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, Murauer M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Peter D et al (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VB) in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. EJC Suppl 2(3):88 (Pubitemid 38063631)
32. 32. Weber WP, Zanetti R, Langer I, Delias S, Zuber M, Moch H et al (2005) Mammotome: less invasive than ABBI with similar accuracy for early breast cancer detection. World J Surg 29(4): 495-499 (Pubitemid 41125376)
33. 33. Apesteguia L, Mellado M, Saenz J, Cordero J, Reparaz B, De Miguel C (2002) Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotaxic table of nonpalpable lesions non-recognisable by ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 12(3):638-645 (Pubitemid 36940110)
34. 34. Cassano E, Urban LABD, Pizzamiglio M, Abbate F, Maisonneuve P, Renne G (2007) Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102(1):103-110 (Pubitemid 46294956)
35. 35. Mercado CL, Hamele-Bena D, Singer C, Koenigsberg T, PileSpellman E, Higgins H et al (2001) Papillary lesions of the breast: evaluation with stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted biopsy 1. RSNA 221(3):650-655 (Pubitemid 33101755)
36. 36. Meloni GB, Dessole S, Becchere MP, Soro D, Capobianco G, Ambrosini G et al (2001) Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18(5):520-524 (Pubitemid 33078425)
37. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, Yang HR, Sohn JH, Kwon GY et al (2008) Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. Am J Roentgenol 190(3):630-636
38. 38. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Symmans WF et al (2001) Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic follow up. Cancer 91:173-177 (Pubitemid 32052628)
39. Choo KS, Kwak HS, Bae YT, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Seo H et al (2008) The value of a combination of wire localization and ultrasoundguided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for clustered microcalcifications. Breast 17(6):611-616
40. 40. Vag T, Pfleiderer SOR, Böttcher J, Wurdinger S, Gajda M, Camara O et al (2007) Ultrasound-guided breast biopsy using a 10-gauge self-contained vacuum-assisted device. Eur Radiol 17(12):3100-3102 (Pubitemid 350142335)
41. 41. Hung WK, Lam HS, Lau Y, Chan CM, Yip AWC (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted biopsy device for imagedetected breast lesions. ANZ J Surg 71(8):457-460 (Pubitemid 32868549)
42. Perretta T, Pistolese CA, Bolacchi F, Cossu E, Fiaschetti V, Simonetti G (2008) MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuumassisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation. La Radiol Med 113(6):830-840
43. Zannis VJ, Aliano KM, Klimberg VS, Beitsch PD (1998) The evolving practice pattern of the breast surgeon with disappearance of open biopsy for nonpalpable lesions. Am J Surg 176(6): 525-528
44. Kim HS, Kim MJ, Kim EK et al (2008) US-guided vacuumassisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and longterm follow-up results. Korean J Radiol 9(6):503
45. Zhang YW, Cong JG, Cang QL, Ling Z, Qun WY (2008) The comparison between mammotome minimally invasive biopsy and cord needle in diagnosis for breast cancer. Chin J Gen Surg 17(11):1145-1147
46. Zang JX, Yu LG, Zen H, Ming CC, Hong L, Weiet GE et al (2007) Clinical application of minimally-invasive stereotactic mammotome biopsy. Wai Ke Li Lun Yu Shi Jian 12(6):577579
47. Zhang L, Wu YQ, Wang LP, Zhou SQ (2004) Nonpalpable breast mass and atypical ductal hyperplasia-diagnosed by mammotome biopsy and surgical management. China J Mod Med 14(9): 110112
48. 48. Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G, Keylock J, Perry J, Eckert M et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14(9):2497-2501 (Pubitemid 47389580)
49. Teng-Swan Ho J, Tan PH, Hee SW, Su-Lin Wong J (2008) Underestimation of malignancy of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on 11-gauge stereotactically guided mammotome breast biopsy: an Asian breast screen experience. Breast 17(4): 401-406
50. Forgeard C, Benchaib M, Guerin N et al (2008) Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients. Am J Surg 196(3):339-345
51. 51. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S (2005) Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 201(1):14-17 (Pubitemid 40840558)
52. 52. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A et al (2006) Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106(5):982 (Pubitemid 43297335)
53. 53. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D et al (2007) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuumassisted breast biopsy. AJR 188:684-690 (Pubitemid 46303191)
54. Pandelidis S, Heilman D, Jones D, Stough K, Trapeni J, Suliman Y (2003) Accuracy of 11 -gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Soc Surg Oncol 10(l):43-47
55. 55. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (1997) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 204(2) :485-488 (Pubitemid 27337499)
56. Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP (1999) Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: Persistent underestimation of disease. Am J Roentgenol 173(l):227-229
57. 57. Zografos GC, Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Nonni A, Koulocheri D, Fotou M et al (2008) Minimizing underestimation rate of microcalcifications excised via vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a blind study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109(2):397-402 (Pubitemid 351644859)
58. 58. Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202(3):843-847 (Pubitemid 27093464)
59. 59. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates 1. RSNA 218(2):497-502 (Pubitemid 32121065)
60. 60. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB (2001) Reliability of histologic diagnosis of breast cancer with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am Surg 67(4):388-392 (Pubitemid 33738174)
61. Zhang L, Sun QX (2008) Study of mammotome minimally invasive biopsy on the diagnosis of breast cancer. Zhong Guo Xian Dai Pu Tong Wai Ke Jin Zhan 11:210-212
62. 62. Yu-yang Li, Fan-zhen Hong, Yong-sheng Wang et al (2007) Use of mammotome system in diagnose of early stage breast cancer. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 14:706-708 (Pubitemid 46864136)
63. Man K, Brem RF (2002) Surgical and mammographic follow-up of papillary lesions and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Breast J 8(4):230-232
64. 64. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM, Nolten A et al (2001) Nonpalpable breast cancer: percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices. Radiology 219:793796 (Pubitemid 32476274)
65. Sim LSJ, Kei PL (2008) Upright stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle biopsy of suspicious breast microcalcifications. J Med Imaging Radiât Oncol. 52:358-364
66. 66. Soo MS, Ghate S, Delong D, Soo MS, Ghate S, Delong D (1999) Stereotactic biopsy of noncalcified breast lesions: utility of vacuum-assisted technique compared to multipass automated gun technique. Clin Imaging 23(6):347-352 (Pubitemid 30433914)
67. Qu WZ, Wei T, Fu YZ, Man Z, Hua JG, Yong WQ et al (2008) The comparison between mammotome minimally invasive biopsy and tru-cut needle in diagnosis for breast cancer. Shi Yong Zhong Liu Zha Zhi 23(5):451-453
68. 68. Zuiani C, Mazzarella F, Londero V et al (2007) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results, follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion. Radiol Med 112:304-317 (Pubitemid 46474834)
69. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP et al (2007) Imaging-histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 189:1852-1859
70. 70. Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M et al (2004) Evaluation of breast imaging reporting and data system category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Cancer 100:710-714 (Pubitemid 38176847)
71. 71. Zografos GC, Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN et al (2007) Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in solid lesions-a blind study. World J Surg Oncol 5:53 (Pubitemid 46901282)
72. Cui M, Liu W, Qin Y et al (2005) Application of ultrasound guided mammotome minimally invasive biopsy system in breast lesions. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 12:1405-1406
73. Wang LP, Deng YB, Lu YP et al (2005) Application of ultrasonography in minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of breast disease. Chin J Ultrasonogr 14:671-673
74. Wei DZ, Lu XY, Zhu DJ et al (2007) Application of high-resolution ultrasound and CDFI-guided minimally invasive operation for breast cancer. Chin J Prim Med Pharm 14:1121-1123
75. 75. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB et al (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25 (Pubitemid 38789561)
76. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH et al (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129-1135
77. Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ Publishing Group, London, UK, pp 248-282
78. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Lijmer J (2002) Diagnostic tests. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) Users' guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. AMA Press, Chicago, IL, pp 121-140
79. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Lijmer J. Diagnostic tests. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds) (2002) Users' guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. AMA Press, Chicago, IL, pp 121-140
80. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55:2698-2708
81. 81. Tavassoli F, Norris HA (1990) Comparison of the results of longterm follow-up for atypical intraductal hyperplasia and intraductal hyperplasia of the breast. Cancer 65:518-529 (Pubitemid 20058370)
82. Page DL, Rogers LW (1992) Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 23:1095-1097
83. Petitti DB (2001) Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 20:3625-3633
84. 84. Bauer VP, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F et al (2003) The management of lobular neoplasia identified on percutaneous core breast biopsy. Breast J 9(l):4-9 (Pubitemid 36176456)