Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions

Cancer

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 982-990

  Perlet, Claudia ^a   Heywang Kobrunner, Sylvia H ^a   Heinig, Anke ^b   Sittek, Harald ^c   Casselman, Jan ^d   Anderson, Ingvar ^e   Taourel, Patrick ^f  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d General Hospital St Jan   (Belgium)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^f LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast; Intervention; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BLEEDING; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPERVENTILATION; INFECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTITIS; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCAR FORMATION; SYNCOPE; VACUUM; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VACUUM;

EID: 33644540773     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21720     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1987;187:493-501.
2. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.
3. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468-473.
4. Drew PJ, Kerin MJ, Turnbull LW, et al. Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:265-270.
5. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D, et al. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast conservative therapy. MAGMA. 1998;7:141-152.
6. Bone B, Aspelin P, Isberg B, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicon implants after cancer surgery. Acta Radiol. 1995;36:111-116.
7. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology. 1997;205:437-440.
8. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology. 1999;212:543-549.
9. Warren RM, Bobrow LG, Earl HM, et al. Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1349-1360.
10. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Van Die LE, et al. Magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer screening of patients from high risk populations: results of a prospective pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1095-1102.
11. Leach MO, Eeles RA, Turnbull LW, et al. The UK national study of magnetic resonance imaging as a method of screening for breast cancer (MARIBS). J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21(3 Suppl):107-114.
12. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Hyynh AT, Viehweg P, Hanke W, Requardt H, Paprosch I. Prototype breast coil for MR-guided needle localization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:876-881.
13. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology. 1994;193:97-102.
14. Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner CC, et al. Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology. 1997;204:667-675.
15. Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Black JW, et al. Interactive MR-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of enhancing lesions in a breast phantom model. Acad Radiol. 1997;4:508-512.
16. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;9:44-59.
17. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Pickuth D, et al. Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localization and biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:36-45.
18. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumloffel U, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1656-1665.
19. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1463-1470.
20. Prat X, Sittek H, Heinig A. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localisation device: technical improvements based on Phase I evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1720-1727.
21. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer. 1994;73:643-651.
22. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;204:485-488.
23. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer. 2004;100:245-251.
24. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1211-1220.