Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: Improved accuracy with directional, vacuum- assisted biopsy

Radiology

Volumn 202, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 843-847

  Burbank, Fred ^a  

^a Mission Breast Care Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast, biopsy; Breast, diseases

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VACUUM ASPIRATION;

EID: 0031055857     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051043     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193:91-95.
2. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164: 1111-1113.
3. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995; 194:379-381.
4. Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough? (editorial). Radiology 1996; 198:313-315.
5. Dershaw DD, Caravella BA, Liberman L. Limitations and complications in the utilization of stereotaxic core breast biopsy. Breast J 1996; 2:13-17.
6. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996; 198:323-325.
7. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: its history, its present, and its future. Am Surg 1996; 62:128-150.
8. Parker SH, Burbank F. State of the art: a practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996; 200:11-20.
9. Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT. Critical pathways in percutaneous breast intervention. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:946-950.
10. Parker SH, Stavros AT, Dennis MA. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1171-1186.
11. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
12. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke FJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-407.
13. Burbank F, Kaye K, Belville J, Ekuan J, Blumenfeld M. Three hundred image guided automated core biopsies in the breast, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Radiology 1994; 191:165-171.
14. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS). 2nd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1995.
15. Parker SH, Dennis MA, Jobe WE, Hendrick RE. Clinical efficacy of digital stereotactic mammography (abstr). Radiology 1993; 189(P):326.
16. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 62:738-744.
17. Parker SH, Burbank FH, Hollander DS. Percutaneous breast biopsy with a new device (abstr). Radiology 1995; 197(P):408.
18. Krebs TL, Berg WA, Severson MJ, et al. Large-core biopsy guns: comparison for yield of breast tissue. Radiology 1996; 200: 365-368.
19. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192:793-795.
20. Dershaw DD. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions (letter). AJR 1995; 164:260.
21. Sullivan DC. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions: reply (letter). AJR 1995; 164:260.
22. Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994; 192: 149-151.