A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 274, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 63-73

  Fahrbach, Kyle ^a   Sledge, Isabella ^a   Cella, Catherine ^a   Linz, Heather ^a   Ross, Susan D ^a  

^a MetaWorks Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Meta analysis; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EUROPE; FOLLOW UP; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH AMERICA; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREDICTION; SCREENING TEST; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 33645979918     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-005-0106-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT (eds) (2004) Cochrane collaboration handbook 4.2.1 (updated December 2003). In: The Cochrane Library. Wiley, Chichester, Issue 1
2. Banks E, Reeves G, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Simmonds M, Hilton E, Bailey S, Barrett N, Briers P, English R, Jackson A, Kutt E, Lavelle J, Rockall L, Wallis MG, Wilson M, Patnick J. (2004) Impact of use of hormone replacement therapy on false positive recall in the NHS breast screening programme: results from the million women study. BMJ 328:1291-1292
3. Berg WA, Jaeger B, Campassi C, Kumar D (1998) Predictive value of specimen radiography for core needle biopsy of non-calaified breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1671-1678
4. Brett J, Austoker J, Ong G (1998) Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last screening appointment. J Public Health Med 20:396-403
5. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactive breast biopsy improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 62:738-744
6. Burbank F (1997) Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 202:843-847
7. Burbank F, Parker SH (1998) Methods for evaluating the quality of an image-guided breast biopsy program. Semin Breast Dis 1:71-83
8. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB (1997) Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 126:376-380
9. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177-188
10. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089-1096
11. Elmore JG, Carney PA, Abraham LA, Barlow WE, Egger JR, Fosse JS, Cutter GR, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Paliwal P, Taplin SH (2004) The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy. Arch Intern Med 164:1140-1147
12. Georgian-Smith D, D'Orsi C, Morris E, Clark CF, Liberty Jr E, Lehman CD (2002) Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using an upright unit, a vacuum-suction needle, and a lateral arm-support system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1017-1024
13. Hedges L, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic, Orlando, pp 230-257
14. Humphrey LL, Chan BKS, Detlefsen S, Helfand M (2002) Screening for breast cancer. Systematic evidence review No. 15 (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0018). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. (Available on the AHRQ Web site at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/serfiles.htm)
15. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA (1997) Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 204:677-684
16. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP III, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Smid AA, Borofsky HB, Lee CH, Goldstein HM, Schilling KJ, Wray AB, Brem RF, Helbich TH, Lehrer DE, Adler SJ (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of non-palpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218:497-502
17. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, Murauer M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Peter D, Heywang-Kobrunner SH (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 100:245-251
18. Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of a stereotaxically guided vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy program in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 52:223-227
19. Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E (1996) Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ 312:273-276
20. Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C, Hawes E (1999) Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer 85:1114-1118
21. Meloni GB, Becchere MP, Soro D, Feo CF, Profili S, Dettori G, Trignano M, Navarra G, Canalis GC (2002) Percutaneous vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy with upright stereotactic equipment. Indications, limitations and results. Acta Radiol 43:575-578
22. Parker SH, Burbank F (1996) A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 200:1-20
23. Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, Mali WP, Peterse JL, Hendriks JL, et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of non-palpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 90:595-600
24. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (1996) Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd edn. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Washington
25. Verkooijen HM (2002) Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 99:853-859
26. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, Koot VC, Borel Rinkes IH, Mali WP, van Vroonhoven TJ (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease. Br J Can 82:1017-1021
27. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Pijnappel RM, Koot VC, Schipper ME, Borel Rinkes IH (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of needle-localized open breast biopsy for impalpable breast disease. Br J Surg 87:344-347
28. Wunderbaldinger P, Wolf G, Turetschek K, Helbich TH (2002) Comparison of sitting versus prone position for stereotactic large-core breast biopsy in surgically proven lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1221-1225