Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in solid lesions - A blind study

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 5, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Zografos, George C ^a   Zagouri, Flora ^a   Sergentanis, Theodoros N ^a   Koulocheri, Dimitra ^a   Nonni, Afroditi ^a   Oikonomou, Vassiliki ^a   Domeyer, Philip ^a   Kotsani, Maria ^a   Fotiadis, Constantine ^a   Bramis, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SOLID TUMOR; TUMOR VOLUME; VACUUM ASSISTED BREAST BIOPSY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCER; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACUUM;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CYTODIAGNOSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VACUUM;

EID: 34250189843     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-53     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Gotzsche PC Olsen O Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000 355 129-134 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06065-1 10675181
2. Tabar L Yen MF Vitak B Chen HH Smith RA Duffy SW Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening Lancet 2003 361 1405-1410 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1 12727392
3. May DS Lee NC Nadel MR Henson RM Miller DS The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998 170 97-104 9423608
4. Kerlikowske K Smith-Bindman R Ljung BM Grady D Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities Ann Intern Med 2003 139 274-284 12965983
5. Kerlikowske K Grady D Barclay J Sickles EA Eaton A Ernster V Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer JAMA 1993 270 2444-2450 10.1001/jama.270.20.2444 8230621
6. Brown ML Fintor L U.S. screening mammography services with mobile units: results from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities Radiology 1995 195 529-532 7724778
7. Obenauer S Hermann KP Grabbe E Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification Eur Radiol 2005 15 1027-1036 10.1007/ s00330-004-2593-9 15856253
8. Orel SG Kay N Reynolds C Sullivan DC BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy Radiology 1999 211 845-850 10352614
9. Eberl MM Fox CH Edge SB Carter CA Mahoney MC BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms J Am Board Fam Med 2006 19 161-164 16513904
10. Chabriais J Kinkel K Thibault F [Using BI-RADS in French] J Radiol 2002 83 531-534 12075159
11. Britton PD Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy Breast 1999 8 1-4 10.1016/S0960-9776(99)90329-6
12. Britton PD McCann J Needle biopsy in the NHS breast screening programme 1996/7: How much and how accurate? Breast 1999 8 5-11 10.1016/ S0960-9776(99)90330-2
13. Heywang-Köbrunner SH Dershaw DD Schreer I Diagnostic breast imaging Stuttgart, New York: Thieme 2 2001
14. Pisano ED Fajardo LL Tsimikas J Sneige N Frable WJ Gatsonis CA Evans WP Tocino I McNeil BJ Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. The RDOG5 investigators Cancer 1998 82 679-688 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0142(19980215)82:4<679::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO;2-V 9477100
15. Takahashi K Gomi N Iwase T Sakamoto G [The role and efficacy of Mammotome biopsy (vacuum-assisted breast biopsy)] Nippon Rinsho 2006 64 469-474
16. Hoorntje LE Peeters PH Mali WP Borel Rinks IH Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A critical review Eur J Cancer 2003 39 1676-1683 10.1016/ S0959-8049(03)00421-0 12888361
17. Mendez A Cabanillas F Echenique M Malekshamran K Perez I Ramos E Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVABB) Ann Oncol 2004 14 450-454 10.1093/annonc/mdh088
18. Kettritz U Morack G Decker T Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: Radiological and pathological correlations Eur J Radiol 2005 55 270-276 10.1016/ j.ejrad.2004.10.014 16036159
19. Dhillon MS Bradley SA England DW Mammotome biopsy: Impact on preoperative diagnosis rate Clin Radiol 2006 61 276-281 10.1016/ j.crad.2005.08.017 16488210
20. Bedei L Falcini F Sanna PA Casadei Giunchi D Innocenti MP Vignutelli P Saragoni L Folli S Amadori D Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: the controversial management of a borderline lesion: Experience of 47 cases diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy Breast 2006 15 196-202 10.1016/ j.breast.2005.05.008 16055333
21. Cox D Bradley S England D The significance of mammotome core biopsy specimens without radiographically identifiable microcalcification and their influence on surgical management - a retrospective review with histological correlation Breast 2006 15 210-218 10.1016/ j.breast.2005.06.001 16081287
22. Plantade R Hammou JC Fighiera M Aubanel D Scotto A Gueret S [Underestimation of breast carcinoma with 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy] J Radiol 2004 85 391-401 15213649
23. Yamamoto D Yamada M Okugawa H Tanaka K Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification: A preliminary report World J Surg Oncol 2004 2 8 419375 15104794 10.1186/1477-7819-2-8
24. Cangiarella J Waisman J Symmans WF Gross J Cohen JM Wu H Axelrod D Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: Analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic followup Cancer 2001 91 173-177 10.1002/ 1097-0142(20010101)91:1<173::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-9 11148574
25. Bartonkova H Demlova R Schneiderova M Hanak L [Mammotomy, new technique not only for breast cancer] Cas Lek Cesk 2006 145 399-402 discussion 402-3. 16755779
26. Irfan K Brem RF Surgical and mammoraphic follow-up of papillary lesions and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy Breast J 2002 8 230-233 10.1046/ j.1524-4741.2002.08408.x 12100116
27. Cassano E Urban LA Pizzamiglio M Abbate F Maisonneuve P Renne G Viale G Bellomi M Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006 16838109
28. Liberman L Dershaw DD Rosen PP Morris EA Abramson AF Borgen PI Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy Radiology 1998 206 711-715 9494489
29. Gajdos C Levy M Herman Z Herman G Bleiweiss IJ Tartter PI Complete removal of nonpalpable breast malignancies with a stereotactic percutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument J Am Coll Surg 1999 189 237-240 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00133-7 10472922
30. Diebold T Hahn T Solbach C Rody A Balzer JO Hansmann ML Marx A Viana F Peters J Jacobi V Kaufmann M Vogl TJ Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV) Invest Radiol 2005 40 465-471 10.1097/ 01.rli.0000167711.78180.a9 15973139
31. Brem RF Schoonjans JM Goodman SN Nolten A Askin FB Gatewood OM Nonpalpable breast cancer: Percutaneous diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy devices Radiology 2001 219 793-796 11376271
32. Jackman RJ Burbank F Parker SH Evans WP 3rd Lechner MC Richardson TR Smid AA Borofsky HB Lee CH Goldstein HM Schilling KJ Wray AB Brem RF Helbich TH Lehrer DE Adler SJ Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates Radiology 2001 218 497-502 11161168
33. Lomoschitz FM Helbich TH Rudas M Pfarl G Linnau KF Stadler A Jackman RJ Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy Radiology 2004 232 897-903 10.1148/ radiol.2323031224 15273332
34. Ceccarelli G Casciola L Battistini I Stefanoni M Spaziani A Conti D Di Zitti L Valeri R Bartoli A Bellochi R Rambotti M Pisanelli MC [Non palpable lesions of the breast: The Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer] G Chir 2005 26 187-193 16184700
35. Obenauer S Fischer U Baum F Dammert S Fuzesi L Grabbe E [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as BI-RADS 3] Rofo 2001 173 696-701 11570238
36. Liberman L Kaplan JB Morris EA Abramson AF Menell JH Dershaw DD To excise or to sample the mammographic target: What is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 679-683 12185043
37. Liberman L Holland AE Marjan D Murray MP Bartella L Morris EA Dershaw DD Wynn RT Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 188 684-690 10.2214/AJR.06.0809 17312054
38. Diebold T Jacobi V Krapfl E von Minckwitz G Solbach C Ballenberger S Hochmuth K Balzer JO Fellbaum M Kaufmann M Vogl TJ [The role of stereotactic 11G vacuum biopsy for clarification of BI-RADS IV findings in mammography] Rofo 2003 175 489-494 12677503
39. Varas X Leborgne JH Leborgne F Mezzera J Jaumandreu S Leborgne F Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 691-695 12185047