Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: Does frozen section give an accurate diagnosis?

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 399-406

  Mueller Holzner, Elisabeth ^a   Frede, Thomas ^a   Daniaux, Martin ^a   Ban, Michael ^a   Taucher, Susanne ^a   Schneitter, Alois ^a   Zeimet, Alain G ^a   Marth, Christian ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Core biopsy; Frozen section; Immediate diagnosis; Psychology

Indexed keywords

PARAFFIN;

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTIONS; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 35649005404     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9508-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Parker SH (1994) Percutaneous large core breast biopsy. Cancer 74:256-262
2. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, Truell JE, Price JG, Kortz AB, Clark DG (1993) US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 187(2):507-511
3. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, Aucreman CJ, Cardenosa G, Cink TM, Coscia JL Jr., Eklund GW, Evans WP 3rd, Garver PR et al (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193(2):359-364
4. Usami S, Moriya T, Kasajima A, Suzuki A, Ishida T, Sasano H, Ohuchi N (2005) Pathological aspects of core needle biopsy for non-palpable breast lesions. Breast Cancer 12:272-278
5. Britton PD (1999) Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 8:1-4
6. Bulgaresi P, Cariaggi P, Ciatto S, Houssami N (2006) Positive predictive value of breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in combination with clinical and imaging findings: a series of 2334 subjects wih abnormal cytology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97:319-321
7. Farshid G, Pieterse S (2006) Core imprint cytology of screen-detected breast lesions is predictive of the histological results. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 108:150-156
8. Jones L, Lott MF, Calder CJ, Kutt E (2004) Imprint cytology from ultrasound-guided core biopsies: accurate and immediate diagnosis in a one-step breast clinic. Clin Radiol 59(10):903-908
9. Klevesath MB, Godwin RJ, Bannon R, Munthali L, Coveney E (2005) Touch imprint cytology of core needle biopsy specimens: a useful method for immediate reporting of symptomatic breast lesions. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(5):490-494
10. Poole K, Lyne PA (2000) The 'cues' to diagnosis: describing the monitoring activities of women undergoing diagnostic investigations for breast disease. J Adv Nurs 31(4):752-758
11. Palsson M, Norberg A (1995) Breast cancer patients' experiences of nursing care with the focus on emotional support: the implementation of a nursing intervention. J Adv Nurs 21(2):277-285
12. Leinster S (1994) How I do it - breast cancer: the psychological management of the patient with early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 20(6):711-714
13. Bauermeister DE (1980) The role and limitations of frozen section and needle aspiration biopsy in breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer 46:947-949
14. Gonzalez E, Grafton WD, Morris M, Barr L (1985) Diagnosing breast cancer using frozen sections from Tru-cutR needle biopsies. Six-year experience with 162 Biopsies, with emphasis on outpatient diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg 202(6):696-701
15. Wells CA, The E.C. Working Group on Breast Cancer Screening Pathology: quality assurance guidelines for pathology (2006) Perry NM on behalf of the EUSOMA working party: multi-disciplinary aspects of quality assurance in the diagnosis of breast disease, 4th edn. European Commission, Luxembourg, p207, pp 232-234
16. Österreichische Gesellschaft für Pathologie (2005) B-Klassifikation für Mamma Stanzbiopsien http.://www.pathology.at/b- klassifikation.htm. Cited 07 Dec 2006
17. Wells CA, The E.C. Working Group on Breast Cancer Screening Pathology: quality assurance guidelines for pathology (2006) European Commission: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn, pp 252-254
18. Caruso ML, Gabrieli G, Marzullo G, Pirelli M, Rizzi E, Sorino F (1998) Core biopsy as alternative to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of breast tumors. Oncologist 3:45-49
19. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D, Bianchi S, Bonardi R, Brancato B, Catarzi S, Risso GR (2006) Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4,000 consecutive biopies. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Oct 11, Epub ahead of print]
20. Dillon MF, Hill ADK, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N (2005) The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 242:701-707
21. Harris GC, Denley HE, Pinder SE, Lee AH, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Evans A (2003) Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27(1):11-15
22. Qureshi NA, Beresford A, Sami S, Boparai R, Gosh S, Carmicael AR (2006) Imprint cytology of needle core-biopsy specimens of breast lesions: Is it a useful adjunt to rapid assessment breast clinics? Breast [Sept 2, Epub ahead of print]
23. Poole K (1997) The emergence of the 'waiting game': a critical examination of the psychosocial issues in diagnosing breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 25:273-281
24. Woodward V, Webb C (2001) Women's anxieties surrounding breast disorders: A systemic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 33:29-41
25. Cornford CS, Harley J, Oswald N (2004) The '2-week rule' for suspected breast carcinoma: a qualitative study of the views of patients and professionals. Br J Gen Pract 54:584-588
26. O'Mahony M (2001) Women's lived experience of breast biopsy: a phenomenological study. J Clin Nurs 10:512-520
27. Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J (2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psychooncology 14:917-938
28. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR et al (1996) Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: Effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol 166:341-346
29. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP et al (1994) Stereotactic 14-gauge breast biopsy - how many core biopsy specimens are needed. Radiology 192:793-795
30. Fishman JE, Milikowski C, Ramsinghani R et al (2003) US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary? Radiology 226:779-782
31. O'Leary R, Hawkins K, Beazley JC, Lansdown MR, Hanby AM (2004) Agreement between preoperative core needle biopsy and postoperative invasive breast cancer histopathology is not dependent on the amount of clinical material obtained. J Clin Pathol 57(2):193-195
32. Mueller-Holzner E, Fink V, Frede T, Marth C (2001) Immunohistochemical determination of HER2 expression in breast cancer from core biopsy specimens: a reliable predictor of HER2 status of the whole tumor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 69(1):13-19
33. Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, Mali WP, Peterse JL,Hendriks JH, Peeters PH (2004) Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 90(3):595-600
34. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ (2002) Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 26:1095-1110
35. Wells CA, The EC (2006) Working Group on Breast Cancer Screening Pathology: Quality assurance guidelines for pathology. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 255
36. Tavassoli FA (1992) Myoepithelial lesions of the breast. In: Tavassoli FA (ed) Pathology of the breast. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Connecticut, pp 593-609
37. Wells CA, The E.C Working Group on Breast Cancer Screening Pathology (2006) Quality assurance guidelines for pathology. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. European Commission, Luxembourg, p 224