A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 11-20

  Parker, Steve H ^a   Burbank, Fred ^b  

^a Radiology Imaging Associates   (United States)

^b Digit and Radiologic Imaging Assoc   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast, biopsy; State of art reviews

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; DEVICE; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 0029938332     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657896     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
2. Azevado E, Svane G, Auer G. Stereotaxic fine-needle biopsy in 2,594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions. Lancet 1989; 1:1033-1036.
3. Dowlatshahi K, Gent HJ, Schmidt R, Jokich PM, Bibbo M, Sprenger E. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with stereotaxic localization and fine-needle aspiration. Radiology 1989; 170:427-433.
4. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Bravetti P. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1989; 173:57-59.
5. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-407.
6. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188:453-455.
7. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MD, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
8. Myer JE. Value of large-core biopsy of occult breast lesions. AJR 1992; 158:991-992.
9. Mukkamala AR, Azher Q, Lawrence L, et al. Stereotaxic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable mammographic lesions (abstr). Radiology 1993; 189(P):325.
10. Jackman RF, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193:91-95.
11. Khan A, Herman PG, Vernace F. Stereotactic large-core breast biopsy. Admin Radiol 1993; 12:33-37.
12. Myer JE, Frenna TH. Core breast biopsy (letter). Radiology 1994; 191:872.
13. Liberman L, Dershaw D, Rosen PP, Cohen MA, Hann LE, Abramson AF. Stereotactic core biopsy of impalpable spiculated breast masses. AJR 1995; 165:551-554.
14. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR 1994; 162:815-820.
15. Sullivan DC. Needle core biopsy of mammographic lesions. AJR 1994; 162:601-608.
16. McComb M, Bassett LW, Jahan R, Fu Y. Imaging guided core biopsy of the breast. Breast J 1995; 1:9-16.
17. Brudlinger DL, Robinson R, Sylvest V, Burton S. Stereotactic core biopsy, an alternative. Va Med Q 1994; 121:179-184.
18. Israel PZ, Fine RE. Stereotactic needle biopsy for occult breast lesions: a minimally invasive alternative. Am Surg 1995; 61:87-91.
19. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
20. Kaelin CM, Smith TJ, Homer MJ, et al. Safety, accuracy and diagnosis yield of needle localization biopsy of the breast performed using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179:267-272.
21. Norton LW, Pearlman NW. Needle localization breast biopsy: accuracy versus cost. Am J Surg 1988; 156:13B-15B.
22. Rissanen TJ, Makaranin HP, Matilla SI, et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammorgraphy. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:14-22.
23. Homer MJ, Smith TJ, Safaii H. Prebiopsy needle localization: methods, problems, and expected results. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:139-153.
24. Homer MJ. Nonpalpable breast microcalcifications: frequency, management, and results of incisional biopsy. Radiology 1992; 185:411-413.
25. Stein MA, Karlan M. Immediate postoperative mammorgam for failed surgical excision of breast lesions. Radiology 1991; 178:159-162.
26. Hasselgren P, Hummel RP, GeorgianSmith O, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993; 114:836-842.
27. Kopans DB. Caution on core. Radiology 1994; 193:325-328.
28. Terry JD. Percutaneous core biopsy (letter). Radiology 1995; 196:581-582.
29. Youngson BJ, Cranor M, Rosen PP. Epithelial displacement in surgical breast specimens following needling procedures. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18:896-903.
30. Parker SH, Burbank F. Percutaneous core biopsy (response). Radiology 1995; 196:582.
31. Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 1991; 178:253-258.
32. Dronkers DJ. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 1992; 183:631-634.
33. Caines JS, McPhee MD, Konok GP, et al. Stereotaxic needle core biopsy of breast lesions using a regular mammographie table with an adaptable Stereotaxic device AJR 1994; 163:317-321.
34. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
35. Parker SH. When is core really core? Radiology 1992; 185:639-644.
36. Hopper KD, Adendroth CS, Sturtz KW, et al. Automated biopsy devices: a blinded evaluation. Radiology 1993; 187:653-660.
37. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgicallly removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14-,16-, and 18-gauge needles. Radiology 1995; 197:739-742.
38. Parker SH. Needle selection. In: Parker SH, Jobe WE, eds. Percutaneous breast biopsy. New York, NY: Raven, 1993; 8.
39. Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT. Critical pathways in percutaneous breast intervention. RadioGraphics 1995; 15:946-950.
40. Parker SH, Stavros AT, Dennis MA. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1171-1186.
41. Sickles EA, Parker SH. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of propably benign lesions. Radiology 1993; 188:315.
42. Logan-Young WW, Janus JA, Stamatia SV, Huffman NT. Apropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions (editorial). Radiology 1994; 190:313-314.
43. Sickles EA, Parker SH. Reply Radiology 1994; 190:313-314.
44. Magaram DL. Management of probably benign lesions of the breast (letter). Radiology 1994; 192:280.
45. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Cohen MA, Hann LE, Abramson, AF. Stereotaxic core biopsy of impalpable spiculated breast masses. AJR 1995; 165:551-554.
46. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
47. Taylor KJW. Can complementary ultrasound reduce the number of biopsies of benign breast masses? Radiology 1993; 189: 179.
48. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192:793-795.
49. Jaques J. Cause of low-density area seen on radiographs made during sterotactic breast biopsy. AJR 1995; 164:1553-1554.
50. Liberman L, Evans WP, Dershaw DD, et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in Stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 190:223-225.