Teaching students with cognitive impairment chained mathematical task of decimal subtraction using simultaneous prompting

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 244-256

  Rao, Shaila ^a   Kane, Martha T ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950549327     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akmanoglu,N.,&Batu,S.(2004)Teachingpointing-numerals- individualswithautismusingsimultaneousprompting. EducationandTraininginDevelopmentalDisabilities,39,326-336(Pubitemid41110710)
2. Birkan, B. (2005) Using simultaneous prompting for teaching various discrete tasks to students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 68-79
3. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S., & Flowers, C. (2006). Assessment of progress in the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 45, 249-259 (Pubitemid 44257773)
4. Collins, B. C, Kleinen, H. L., & Land, L. E. (2006). Addressing Math standards and functional math. In D. M. Browder & F. Spooner (Eds.) Teaching language arts, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (197-227). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
5. Fedco, K. S., Schuster, J. W., Harley, D. A., & Collins, B. C. (1999). Using simultaneous prompting to teach a chained vocational task to young adults with severe inteUectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 318-329.
6. Gurganus, S. P. (2007). Math instruction for students with learning problems. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Gursel, O., Tekin-Iftar, E., & Bozhurt, F. (2006). Effectiveness of simultaneous prompting in small groups: The opportunity of acquiring non-target skills dirough observational learning and instructive feedback. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 225-243.
8. Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2000). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
9. Hudson, P., & Miller, S. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students withe learning needs. Boston, MA: AUyn and Bacon.
10. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§1400 et seq.
11. Jolivette, K., Lingo, A. S., Houchins, D. E., BartonArwood, S. M., & Shippen, M. E. (2006). Building math fluency for students with developmental disabilities and attentional difficulties using "Great Leaps Math". Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 392-400.
12. Kennedy, C., & Horn, E. (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Maciag, K. G., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Cooper, J. T. (2000). Training adults with moderate and severe mental retardation in a vocational skill using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 306-316.
14. Morse, T. E., & Schuster J. W. (2004). Simultaneous prompting: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(2), 153-168
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000), Principals and standards for school mathematics.
16. Reston, VA: Audior. No ChUd left behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
17. Rao, S., & Mallow, L. (2009). Using simultaneous prompting procedure to promote recall of multiplication facts by middle school students with cognitive impairment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 80-90.
18. Singer-Dudek,J.,&Greer,R.D.(2005).Along- termanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenfluencyandthetrainingandmaintenanceofco mplexmadiskills.ThePsychologicalRecord,55,361-376(Pubitemid41179904)
19. Singleton, D. K., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., & Collins, B. C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182-199.
20. Sneil, M., & Brown, F. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper saddle River, NJ: Merril, Prentice Hall
21. Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D., Sc Cichetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (survey form). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
22. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., Sc Satder, J. M. (1986). Manual for the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside
23. Wechsler, D. (1989). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation
24. Wesding, D., Sc Fox, L. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc
25. Wolery, M., Ault, M., & Doyle, P. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longman