Using simultaneous prompting procedure to promote recall of multiplication facts by middle school students with cognitive impairment

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 80-90

  Rao, Shaila ^a,c   Mallow, Lynette ^b  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bronson Junior/Senior High School   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62449167433     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Akmanoglu, N., & Batu, S. (2004). Teaching pointing to numerals to individuals with autism using simultaneous prompting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 326-336.
2. Akmanoglu-Uludag, N., & Batu, S. (2005). Teaching naming relatives to individuals with autism using simultaneous prompting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 401-410.
3. Birkan, B. (2005). Using simultaneous prompting for teaching various discrete tasks to students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 68-79.
4. Fickel, K., Schuster, J., & Collins, B. (1998). Teaching different tasks using different stimuli in a heterogeneous small group. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 219-244.
5. Gibson, A., & Schuster, J. (1998). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247-267.
6. Gursel, O., Tekin-Iftar, E., & Bozkurt, F. (2006). Effectiveness of simultaneous prompting in small group: The opportunity of acquiring non-target skills through observational learning and instructive feedback. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 225-243.
7. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997, PL 105-17, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
8. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
9. Kennedy, C., & Horn, E., (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10. McCallum, E., Skinner, C., Turner, H., & Saecker, L. (2006). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using lowtech, class wide, time-delay intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 419-434.
11. Morse, T., & Schuster, J. (2004). Simultaneous prompting: A review of literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 153-168.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principals and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13. No Child left behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.
14. Singleton, D. K., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., & Collins, B. C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182-199.
15. Snell, M., & Brown, F. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
16. Tekin-Iftar, E., Acar, G., & Kurt, O. (2003). The effects of simultaneous prompting on teaching expressive identification of objects: An instructive feedback study. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 149-167.
17. Vaughn, S., Bos, C., & Schumm, J. (2007). Teaching students who are exceptional, diverse, and at risk in the general education classrooms (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
18. Westling, D., & Fox, L. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (7th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
19. Wolery, M., Ault, M., & Doyle, P. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longman.