Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: A preliminary study: Teacher assessment

Medical Education

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 379-386

  Conigliaro, Rosemarie L ^a   Stratton, Terry D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; KENTUCKY; TEACHING;

EID: 77949904032     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03612.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Marriott DJ, Litzelman DK. Students' global assessments of clinical teachers: a reliable and valid measure of teaching effectiveness. Acad Med 1998 73 72 4.
2. Vu TR, Marriott DJ, Stratos GA, Skeff KM, Litzelman DK. Prioritising areas for faculty development of clinical teachers using student evaluations for evidence-based decisions. Acad Med 1997 10 (Suppl 7 9.
3. Irby D, Rakestraw P. Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine. J Med Educ 1981 56 : 181 186.
4. Remmen R, Denekens J, Scherpbier A, Hermann I, van der Vleuten C, van Royen P, Bossaert L. An evaluation of the didactic quality of clerkships. Med Educ 2000 34 : 460 464.
5. Ramsey PG, Gillmore GM, Irby DM. Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness. J Gen Intern Med 1988 3 : 351 355.
6. Smith CA, Varkey AB, Evans AT, Reilly BM. Evaluating the performance of in-patient attending physicians: a new instrument for today's teaching hospitals. J Gen Intern Med 2004 19 : 766 771.
7. van der Hem-Stokroos HH, van der Vleuten CPM, Daelmans HEM, Haarman HJ, Scherpbier AJJA. Reliability of the clinical teaching effectiveness instrument. Med Educ 2005 39 : 904 910.
8. Beckman TJ, Ghosh AK, Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Mandrekar JN. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of published instruments J Gen Intern Med 2004 19 : 971 977.
9. Buchel TL, Edwards FD. Characteristics of effective clinical teachers. Fam Med 2005 37 (1 30 5.
10. Morrison EH, Hitchcock MA, Harthill M, Boker JR, Masunaga H. The online Clinical Teaching Perception Inventory: a 'snapshot' of medical teachers. Fam Med 2005 37 (1 48 53.
11. Beckman TJ. Lessons learned from a peer review of bedside teaching. Acad Med 2004 79 : 343 346.
12. Beckman TJ, Mandrekar JN. The interpersonal, cognitive and efficiency domains of clinical teaching. Med Educ 2005 39 : 1221 1229.
13. Elnicki DM, Cooper A. Medical students' perceptions of the elements of effective in-patient teaching by attending physicians and house staff. J Gen Intern Med 2005 20 : 635 639.
14. Elnicki DM, Kolarik R, Bardella I. Third-year medical students' perceptions of effective teaching behaviours in a multidisciplinary ambulatory clerkship. Acad Med 2004 78 : 815 819.
15. Price DA, Mitchell CA. A model for clinical teaching and learning. Med Educ 1993 27 : 62 8.
16. Speer AJ, Elnicki DM. Assessing the quality of teaching. Am J Med 1999 106 : 381 384.
17. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med 2003 15 (4 270 292.
18. Myers KA. Evaluating clinical teachers: does the learning environment matter? Acad Med 2001 76 (3 286.
19. Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, Schiffer R. What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Acad Med 2008 83 : 452 466.
20. Stratton TD, Rudy DW, Sauer MJ, Perman JA, Jennings CD. Lessons from industry: one school's transformation toward 'Lean' curricular governance. Acad Med 2007 4 : 331 340.
21. Stratton TD, Napier ET, Jennings CD, Jacob RJ. Are student ratings of faculty instruction sufficient? A comparison of trained observer and student ratings in a second-year basic science course. Abstract presented to the Southern Group on Education Affairs (SGEA), Nashville, TN, 3-5 April 2008.
22. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School. Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. http://www.lcme.org/functions2008jun.pdf. [Accessed 25 July 2008.]
23. Copeland HL, Hewson MG. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical centre. Acad Med 2000 75 (2 161 166.
24. Stark P. Teaching and learning in the clinical setting: a qualitative study of the perceptions of students and teachers. Med Educ 2003 37 : 975 982.
25. Kernan WN, Lee MY, Stone SL, Freudigman KA, O'Connor PG. Effective teaching for preceptors of ambulatory care: a survey of medical students. Am J Med 2000 108 : 499 502.
26. Hirschmann K, Regan-Smith M, Yaich S, Iobst W. Changing culture from the floor up: reinventing definitions of good teaching through direct observation of resident rounds. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education e-Bulletin. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/bulletin-e/e-bulletin05-07.pdf. [Accessed 22 January 2010.].
27. Fry H, Morris C. Peer observation of clinical teaching. Med Educ 2004 38 : 560 561.
28. Griffith CH, Georgesen JC, Wilson JF. Six-year documentation of the association between excellent clinical teaching and improved student examination performance. Acad Med 2000 75 62 4.
29. Roop SA, Pangaro L. Effect of clinical teaching on student performance during a medicine clerkship. Am J Med 2001 110 : 205 209.
30. Stern DT, Williams BC, Gill A, Gruppen LD, Woolliscroft JO, Grum CM. Is there a relationship between attending physicians' and residents' teaching skills and students' examination scores? Acad Med 2000 75 : 1144 1146.
31. Blue AV, Griffith CH, Wilson JF, Sloan DA, Schwartz RW. Surgical teaching quality makes a difference. Am J Surg 1999 177 : 86 9.
32. Shavelson RJ, Webb NM. Generalizability Theory: a Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 1991 1 16.
33. Brennan RL. Manual for urgenova Version 2.1. ACTT Technical Bulletin No. 49. Iowa City, IA : ACT, Inc. 1991.
34. McMaster University, Programme for Educational Research and Development. G-String II - A Windows wrapper for urgenova. http://fhs.mcmaster.ca/perd/ download/g
35. Crick JE, Brennan RL. Manual for genova: a Generalized Analysis of Variance System. ACTT Technical Bulletin No. 43. Iowa City, IA : ACT, Inc. 1983.
36. Cronbach LJ, Rajaratnam N, Gleser GC. Theory of generalizability: a liberalization of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology 1963 16 : 137 163.
37. Case SM. The use of imprecise terms in examination questions: how frequent is frequently? Acad Med 1994 69 (Suppl 4 6.