Lessons Learned from A Peer Review of Bedside Teaching

Academic Medicine

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 343-346

  Beckman, Thomas J ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; REVIEW; TEACHING;

EID: 1842584697     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200404000-00011     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Irby DM. Peer review of teaching in medicine. J Med Educ. 1983;58: 457-61.
2. Horowitz S, Van Eyck S, Albanese M. Successful peer review of courses: a case study. Acad Med. 1998;73:266-71.
3. Speer AJ, Elnicki DM. Assessing the quality of teaching. Am J Med. 1999;106:381-4.
4. Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Rohren CH. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach. 2003;25:131-5.
5. Skeff KM. Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1988 (March-April);3(suppl):S26-S33.
6. Irby DM. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333-42.
7. Maslow AH. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press, 1971;3-41, 155-80.
8. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983; 250:777-81.
9. Suzuki S. Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind. New York: Weatherhill, 1970:21-2.
10. Rogers CR, Freiberg HJ. Freedom to Learn. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, 1994:151-67.