Recovering phylogenetic signal from frog mating calls

Zoologica Scripta

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 141-154

  Goicoechea, Noemí ^a   De La Riva, Ignacio ^a   Padial, José M ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANURA;

EID: 77949511308     PISSN: 03003256     EISSN: 14636409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00413.x     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Angulo A, Reichle S. Acoustic signals, species diagnosis, and species concepts: the case of a new cryptic species of Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) from the Chapare region, Bolivia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2008, 152:59-77.
2. Archie J W. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 1985, 34:326-345.
3. Bee M A, Perril S A. Responses to conspecific advertisement calls in the green frog (Rana clamitans) and their role in male-male communication. Behaviour 1996, 133:283-301.
4. Bee M A, Perrill S A, Owen P C. Male green frogs lower the pitch of acoustic signals in defense of territories: a possible dishonest signal of size? Behavioral Ecology 2000, 11:169-177.
5. Peak. Ver. 3.2 2002, [Computer software and manual], Petaluma, Berkley Integrated Audio Software Inc
6. Bickford D, Lohman D J, Navjot S S, Ng P K L, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram K K, Das I. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:148-155.
7. Blair W F. Mating call in the speciation of anuran amphibians. The American Naturalist 1958, 92:27-51.
8. Blair W F. Non-morphological data in anuran classification. Systematic Zoology 1962, 11:72-84.
9. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Ver. 4.5.02 2006, [Computer software and manual], Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Ámsterdam
10. Bosch J, Boyero L. Precopulatory behaviour and the evolutionary relationships of Discoglossidae. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2003, 41:145-151.
11. Bosch J, De la Riva I. Are frog calls modulated by the environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2004, 82:880-888.
12. Cannatella D C, Hillis D M, Chippindale P T, Weigt L, Rand S A, Ryan M J. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Systematic Biology 1998, 47:311-335.
13. Cocroft R B, Ryan M J. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:283-303.
14. Colless D H. Congruence between morphometric and allozyme data for Menidia species: a reappraisal. Systematic Zoology 1980, 29:288-299.
15. Desutter-Grandcolas L, Robillard T. Acoustic evolution in crickets: need for phylogenetic study and reappraisal of signal effectiveness. Annais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 2004, 76:301-315.
16. Doherty Jthomampersand, Gerhardt Hthomampersand. Acoustic commu-nication in hybrid tree frogs: sound production by males and selective phonotaxis by females. Journal of Comparative Physiology 1984, 154:319-330.
17. Duellman W E, Trueb L. The Biology of Amphibians 1986, New York, McGraw Hill Book Company
18. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 1985, 125:1-15.
19. Frost D, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain R H, Haas A, Haddad C F B, De Sá R, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan S C, Raxworthy C J, Campbell J A, Blotto B L, Moler P, Drewes R C, Nussbaum R A, Lynch J D, Green D M, Wheeler W C. The Amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2006, 297:1-370.
20. García-Cruz J, Sosa V. Coding quantitative character data for phylogenetic analysis: a comparison of five methods. Systematic Botany 2006, 31:302-309.
21. Sequencher. Ver. 4.1 2000, [Computer software and manual], Ann Arbor, MI, Gene Codes Corporation
22. Gerhardt H C. Vocalizations of some hybrid treefrogs: acoustic and behavioral analyses. Behaviour 1974, 49:130-151.
23. Gerhardt H C. Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the grey treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Science 1978, 199:992-994.
24. Gerhardt H C. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1994, 25:293-324.
25. Gil D, Gahr M. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002, 17:133-141.
26. Hedges S B, Duellman W E, Heinicke M P. New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 2008, 1737:1-182.
27. Heyer W R. The relationships of Leptodactylus diedrus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Alytes 1998, 16:1-24.
28. Hillis D M. Approaches to assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 1995, 18:1-32.
29. Hillis D M, Bull J J. An empirical test of boot-strapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 1993, 42:182-192.
30. Hillis D M, Huelsenbeck J P. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 1992, 83:189-195.
31. Hillis D M, Moritz C, Mable B K. Molecular Systematics 1996, Suderland, Sinauer
32. Huelsenbeck J P. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 1991, 40:257-270.
33. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 2005, 30:3059-3066.
34. Kluge A, Farris J S. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 1969, 18:1-32.
35. Lawing A M, Meik J M, Shargel W E. Coding meristic characters for phylogenetic analysis: a comparison of step-matrix-gap-weighting and generalized frequency coding. Systematic Biology 2008, 57:167-173.
36. Littlejohn M J. A repraisal of mating call differentiation in Hyla cadaverina (=Hyla californiae and Hyla regilla). Evolution 1971, 25:98-112.
37. Loftus-Hills J J, Littlejohn M J. Mating call sound intensities of anuran amphibians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:1327-1329.
38. López P T, Narins P M, Lewis E R, Moore S W. Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris. Animal Behavior 1988, 36:1295-1308.
39. Maddison W, Slatkin M. Parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states do not depend on the relative distances between linearly ordered character states. Systematic Zoology 1990, 39:175-178.
40. Márquez R, De la Riva I, Bosch J. Advertisement calls of Bolivian Leptodactylidae (Amphibia, Anura). Journal of Zoology 1995, 237:313-336.
41. Martin W F. Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. Evolution in the Genus Bufo 1972, 279-309. Blair W F. In, Ed, pp, Austin, University of Texas Press
42. Martin W F, Gans C. Muscular control of the vocal tract during release signalling in the toad Bufo valliceps. Journal of Morphology 1972, 137:1-27.
43. Mattern M Y, McLennan D A. Total evidence phylogeny of Gasterosteidae: combining molecular, morphological and behavioral data. Cladistics 2004, 20:14-22.
44. Mazzoni D, Dannenberg R. Audacity: A Free, Cross-Platform Digital Audio Editor. Ver. 1.2.6 1999, [Computer software and manual], Boston, MA, USA, Free Software Foundation
45. McClelland B E, Wilczynski W, Ryan M J. Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans). Journal of Experimental Biology 1996, 199:1907-1919.
46. McLennan D A. Phylogenetic relationships in the Gasterosteidae: an updated tree based on behavioral characters with a discussion of homoplasy. Copeia 1993, 1993:318-326.
47. Narins P M, Hödl W, Grabul D S. Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2003, 100:577-580.
48. Navas C A. Implications of microhabitat selection and patterns of activity on the thermal ecology of high elevation Neotropical anurans. Oecologia 1996a, 108:617-626.
49. Navas C A. Thermal dependency of field locomotor and vocal performance of high-elevation anurans in the tropical Andes. Journal of Herpetology 1996b, 30:478-487.
50. Newman J D. Neural circuits underlying crying and cry responding in mammals. Behavioural Brain Research 2007, 182:155-165.
51. Noll F B. Behavioral phylogeny of corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apidae), with special reference to social behavior. Cladistics 2002, 18:137-153.
52. Padial J M, De la Riva I. Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic Amazonian species of Pristimantis (Anura). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2009, 155:97-122.
53. Padial J M, Köhler J, Muñoz A, De la Riva I. Assessing the taxonomic status of tropical frogs through bioacoustics: geographical variation in the advertisement call in the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2008a, 152:353-365.
54. Padial J M, Chaparro J C, De la Riva I. Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura) based on two mtDNA genes and external morphology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2008b, 152:737-773.
55. Padial J M, Castroviejo-Fisher S, De la Riva I. The phylogenetic relationships of Yunganastes revisited (Anura: Terrarana). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2009, 52:911-915.
56. Philippe H, Lecointre G, Vân Lê H L, Le Guyader H A. Critical study of homoplasy in molecular data with the use of a morphologically based cladogram, and its consequences for character weighting. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1996, 13:1174-1186.
57. Poe S, Wiens J J. Character selection and the methodology of morphological phylogenetics. Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data 2000, 20-36. Wiens J J, In, Ed, pp, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press
58. Price J J, Lanyon S M. Patterns of song evolution and sexual selection in the oropendolas and caciques. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 3:485-497.
59. Pröhl H, Koshy R A, Mueller U, Rand S A, Ryan J M. Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern Túngara frogs. Evolution 2006, 60:1669-1679.
60. Rae T C. The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1998, 14:221-228.
61. Robillard T, Höbel G, Gerhardt H C. Evolution of advertisement signal in North American hylid frogs: vocalizations as end products of calling behavior. Cladistics 2006a, 22:533-545.
62. Robillard T, Legendre F, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Grandcolas P. Phylogenetic analysis and alignment of behavioral sequences by direct optimization. Cladistics 2006b, 22:1-32.
63. Ryan M J. Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Science 1980, 209:523-525.
64. Ryan M J. Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System 1988, 637-677. Fritzsch BRyan MWilczynski WWalkowiak WHetherington T. In, Eds, pp, New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc
65. Ryan M J. Phylogenetics and behavior: some cautions and expectations. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior 1996, 1-21. Martins E. In, Ed, pp, Oxford, Oxford University Press
66. Ryan M J, Kime N M. Selection on long distance acoustic signals. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research; Acoustic Communication 2003, 225-274. Simmons A, Fay RPopper A. In, Eds, pp, Berlin, Springer Verlag
67. Ryan M J, Rand A S. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1993, 340:187-195.
68. Ryan M J, Cocroft R B, Rand A S. The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Evolution 1990, 44:1869-1872.
69. Ryan M J, Rand A S, Weigt L A. Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 1996, 50:2435-2453.
70. Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
71. Schmidt R S. Larynx control and call production in frogs. Copeia 1965, 1965:143-147.
72. Simmons L W, Bailey W J. Agonistic commu-nication between males of a zaprochiline katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behavioral Ecology 2004, 4:364-368.
73. Simmons J A, Fenton M B, O'Farrell M J. Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 1979, 203:16-21.
74. Smith E N, Gutberlet R L. Generalized frequency coding: a method of preparing polymorphic multistate characters for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 2001, 50:156-169.
75. Somero G N, Dahlhoff E, Lin J J. Stenotherms and eurytherms: mechanisms establishing thermal optima and tolerance ranges. Animals and Temperature: Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptation 1996, 53-78. Johnston I A, Bennett A F, In, Eds, pp, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
76. Sueur J, Vanderpool D, Simon C, Ouvrard D, Bourgoin D. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Tibica (Hemiptera, Cicacidae): rapid radiation and acoustic behaviour. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2007, 91:611-626.
77. Swiderski D L, Zelditch M L, Fink W L. Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 1998, 47:508-519.
78. Swofford D L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony* and Other Methods. Ver. 4.b.10 2002, [Computer software and manual], Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates
79. Thiele K. The Holy Grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 1993, 9:275-304.
80. Urbani C B. Phylogeny and behavioural evolution in ants, with a discussion of the role of behaviour in evolutionary processes. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 1989, 1:137-168.
81. Vences M, Wake D. Speciation, species boundaries and phylogeography of amphibians. Amphibian Biology 2007, 2613-2671. Heatwole H, In, Ed, Vol. 7, pp, Chipping Norton, Surrey Beatty and Sons
82. Wenzel J W. Behavioral homology and phylogeny. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1992, 23:361-381.
83. Wiens J J, Servedio M R. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Systematic Biology 1997, 46:332-345.
84. Wiens J J. Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic sys-tematics. Systematic Biology 1995, 44:482-500.
85. Wiens J J. Character analysis in morphological phylo-genetics: problems and solutions. Systematic Biology 2001, 50:689-699.
86. Wiens J J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylo-genetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 2003, 52:528-538.
87. Wiens J J. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology 2004, 53:653-661.
88. Wiens J J, Etheridge R E. Phylogenetic relationships of hoplocercid lizards: coding and combining meristic, morphometric and polymorphic data using step matrices. Herpetologica 2003, 59:375-398.
89. Wiens J J, Brandley M C, Reeder T W. Why does a trait evolve multiple times within a clade? Repeated evolution of snake-like body form in squamate reptiles. Evolution 2006, 60:123-141.
90. Wilczynski W, Rand A S, Ryan M J. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 2001, 58:137-151.
91. Wollenberg K C, Glaw F, Meyer A, Vences M. Molecular phylogeny of Malagasy reed frogs, Heterixalus, and the relative performance of bioacoustics and color-patterns for resolving their systematics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2007, 45:14-22.
92. Zaldivar-Riverón A, Nieto-Montes de Oca A, Laclette J P. Phylogeny and evolution of dorsal pattern in the Mexican endemic lizard genus Barisia (Anguidae: Gerrhonotinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2005, 43:243-257.