Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus

Evolution

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 2435-2453

  Ryan, Michael J ^a,b   Stanley Rand, A ^b   Weigt, Lee A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

Advertisement calls; allozyme variation; genetic variation; geographical variation; Physalaemus pustulosus; sexual selection; tungara frog

Indexed keywords

ANURA; PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS;

EID: 12644312178     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03630.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. ANDERSSON, M 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. BAKER, M. C., AND M. A. CUNNINGHAM. 1985. The biology of bird song dialects. Behav. Brain Sci. 8:85-133.
3. BALABAN, E. 1988 Cultural and genetic variation in swamp sparrows (Melospoza georgiana). I. Song variation, genetic variation, and their relationship. Behaviour 105:250-291.
4. BLAIR, W. F. 1964. Isolating mechanisms and interspecies interactions in anuran amphibians. Quart. Rev. Biol. 39:334-344.
5. BUTLIN, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13.
6. CANNATELLA, D. C., AND W. E. DUELLMAN. 1984. Leptodactylid frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Copeia 1984: 902-921.
7. CLARIDGE, M. F., AND J. C. MORGAN. 1993. Geographical variation in acoustic signals of the planthopper, Nilaparvata bakeri (Muir), in Asia: Species recognition and sexual selection. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48:267-281.
8. COCROFT, R. C., AND M. J. RYAN. 1995. Patterns of mating call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim. Behav. 49:283-303.
9. COYNE, J. A., AND H. A. ORR. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
10. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Murray, London.
11. _. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
12. DOBZHANSKY, TH. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
13. DOUGLAS, M. E., AND J. A. ENDLER. 1982. Quantitative matrix comparisons in ecological and evolutionary investigations. J. Theor. Biol. 99:777-795.
14. ENDLER, J. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. _. 1983. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Env. Biol. Fishes 9:173-190.
16. ENDLER, J. A., AND A. E. HOUDE. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
17. GERHARDT, H. C. 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:293-324.
18. GRANT, P. 1972. Convergent and divergent character displacement. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 4:39-68.
19. HANFORD, P , AND F. NOTTEBOHM. 1976. Allozymic and morphological variation in population samples of rufous-collared sparrows, Zonotrichia capensis, in relation to vocal dialects. Evolution 30:802-817.
20. HOUDE, A. E., AND J. A. ENDLER. 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248:1405-1408.
21. HUBER, F. 1990. Nerve cells and insect behavior - Studies on crickets. Am. Zool. 30:609-627.
22. LANDE, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
23. LEGENDRE, P., AND A. VAUDOR 1991. The R-package: Multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. Univ. of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
24. LITTLEJOHN, M. J., AND J. D. ROBERTSON. 1975. Acoustic analysis of an intergrade zone between two call races of the Limnodynastes tasmaniensis complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in southeastern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 23:113-122.
25. LOFSTEDT, C. 1993. Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., London, Series B Biol. Sci. 340:167-177.
26. LOUGHEED, S. C., AND P. HANDFORD. 1992. Vocal dialects and the structure of geographic variation in morphological and allozymic characters in the rufous-collared sparrow Zonotrichia capensis. Evolution 46:1443-1456.
27. LYNCH, J. D. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactylid frogs. Univ Kans. Mus. Nat. Hist., Misc. Publ. 53.
28. MARLER, P. 1957. Specific distinctiveness in the communication signals of birds. Behaviour 11:13-39.
29. MARTIN, W. R. 1972. Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. Pp. 279-308 in W. F. Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.
30. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge, MA.
31. _. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. MCCLELLAND, B. E., W. WILCZYNSKI, AND M. J. RYAN. 1996. Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans). J. Exp. Biol. 199:1907-1919.
33. MURPHY, R. W., J. W. SITES, D. G. BUTH, AND C. H. HAUFLER. 1990. Proteins I: Isozyme electrophoresis. Pp. 45-126 in D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds. Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. NEI, M 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
35. NEVO, E., AND R. R. CAPRANICA. 1985. Evolutionary origin of ethological reproductive isolation in cricket frogs. Acris. Evol. Biol. 19:147-214.
36. NOTTEBOHM, F. 1969. The song of the chingolo, Zonotrichia capensis, in Argentina: Description and evaluation of a system of dialects. Condor 71:299-315.
37. NOTTEBOHM, F., AND R. K. SELANDER. 1972. Vocal dialects and gene frequencies in the chingalo sparrow (Zonotrichia capensis). Condor 74:137-143.
38. PATERSON, H. E. H 1985. The recognition concept of species. Pp. 21-29 in E. Vrba, ed. Species and speciation. Transvaal Mus. Monogr., No. 4. Pretoria, South Africa.
39. RAND, A. S. 1988. An overview of anuran acoustic communication. Pp. 415-31 in B. Fritzsch, M. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, W. Walkowiak, T. Hetherington, eds. The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
40. RAND, A. S., AND M. J. RYAN. 1981. The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a Neotropical frog. Z. Tierpsychol. 57:209-214.
41. RAND, A. S., M. J. RYAN, AND W. WILCZYNSKI. 1992. Signal redundancy and receiver permissiveness in acoustic mate recognition by the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Am. Zool. 32:81-90.
42. RITCHIE, M. 1991. Female preference for "song races" of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettogoniidae). Anim. Behav. 42: 518-520.
43. _. 1992. Variation in male song and female preference within a population of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Anim. Behav. 43:845-855.
44. RITCHIE, M.G., R. K. BUTLIN, AND G. M. HEWITT. 1992. Fitness consequences of potential assortative mating inside and outside a hybrid zone in Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae): Implications for reinforcement and sexual selection theory. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45:219-234.
45. RYAN, M. J. 1980. Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Science 209:523-525.
46. _. 1985. The túngara frog: A study in sexual selection and communication. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. _. 1988. Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication. Pp 637-677 in B. Fritzsch, M. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, W. Walkowiak, T. Hetherington, eds. The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
48. _. 1991. Sexual selection and communication in frogs: Some recent advances. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:351-354.
49. RYAN, M. J., AND A. KEDDY-HECTOR. 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139:S4-S35.
50. RYAN, M. J., AND A. S. RAND 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44:305-314.
51. _. 1993a Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
52. _. 1993b. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340:187-195.
53. _. 1995. The response of female túngara frogs to ancestral mating calls. Science 269:390-392.
54. RYAN, M. J., AND W. E. WAGNER JR. 1987. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: Female swordtails prefer heterospecific mates. Science 236:595-597.
55. RYAN, M. J., AND W. WILCZYNSKI. 1991. Evolution of intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepitans, Hylidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44:249-271.
56. RYAN, M. J., M. D. TUTTLE, AND A. S. RAND. 1982. Sexual advertisement and bat predation in a Neotropical frog. Am. Nat. 119:136-139.
57. RYAN, M. J., J. H. Fox, W. WILCZYNSKI, AND A. S. RAND. 1990a. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343:66-67.
58. RYAN, M. J., R. B. COCROFT, AND W. WILCZYNSKI. 1990b. The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Evolution 44:1869-1872.
59. SANDERSON, N., J. M. SZYMURA, AND N. H. BARTON. 1992. Variation in mating call across the hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads Bombina bombina and B. variegata. Evolution 46. 595-607.
60. SEARCY, W. A., AND M. ANDERSSON. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:507-533.
61. SMOUSE, P. E., J. C. LONG, AND R. R. SOKAL. 1986. Multiple regression and correlational extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627-632.
62. SWOFFORD, D. L., AND R. B. SELANDER. 1981. BIOSYS-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72: 281-283.
63. TRAVIS, J. 1994. Size dependent behavioral variation and its genetic control within and among populations. Pp. 165-187 in C. R. B. Boake, ed. Quantitative genetic studies of behavioral evolution. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
64. TURNER, G. F., AND M. T. BURROWS. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260:287-292.
65. TUTTLE, M. D., AND M. J. RYAN. 1981. Bat predation and the evolution of fros vocalizations in the Neotropics. Science 214: 677-678.
66. WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183
67. WILCZYNSKI, W., AND M. J. RYAN. In press. Geographic variation in animal communication systems. In S. A. Foster and J. Endler, eds.Geographic diversification of behavior: An evolutionary perspective. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
68. WILCZYNSKI, W., A. S. RAND, AND M. J. RYAN. 1995. The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim. Behav. 49:911-929.
69. WILKINSON, L. 1990. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evantson, IL.
70. YOUNG, J., J. W HUPP, J. W. BRADBURY, AND C. E. BRAUN. 1994. Phenotypic divergence of secondary sexual traits among sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus, populations. Anim. Behav. 47:1353-1362
71. ZINK, R. M., AND G. F. BARROWCLOUGH. 1984. Allozymes and song dialects: A reassessment. Evolution 38:444-448.