Total evidence phylogeny of Gasterosteidae: Combining molecular, morphological and behavioral data

Cladistics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 14-22

  Mattern, Michelle Y ^a   McLennan, Deborah A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENETICS;

APELTES; CULAEA; GASTEROSTEIDAE; GASTEROSTEIFORMES; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; GASTEROSTEUS WHEATLANDI; PUNGITIUS; SPINACHIA; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 1642346226     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00005.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baker, R.H., DeSalle, R., 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids Syst. Biol. 46, 654-673.
2. Bowne, P.S., 1985. The systematic position of Gasterosteiformes. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
3. Bowne, P.S., 1994 Systematics and morphology of the Gasterosteiformes. In: Bell, M.A., Foster, S.A. (Eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, pp. 28-60.
4. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42, 795-803.
5. Brooks, D.R., McLennan, D.A., 2002. The Nature of Diversity: An Evolutionary Voyage of Discovery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
6. FitzGerald, G.J., 1992. Egg cannibalism by sticklebacks: spite or selfishness? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30, 201-206.
7. Haglund, T.R., Buth, D.G., Lawson, R., 1992a. Allozyme variation and phylogenetic relationships of Asian, North American, and European populations of the ninespine stickleback, Pungitius pungitius. In: Mayden. R.L. (Ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 438-452.
8. Haglund, T.R., Buth, D.G., Lawson, R., 1992b. Allozyme variation and phylogenetic relationships of Asian, North American, and European populations of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Copeia, 1992, 432-443.
9. Keivany, Y., Nelson, J.S., 2000. Taxonomic review of the genus Pungitius, ninespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). Cybium, 24, 107-122.
10. Kishino, H., Hasegawa, M., 1989. Evaluation of the maximum-likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA-sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29, 170-179.
11. Kluge, A.J., 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38, 7-25.
12. Kluge, A.J., 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics, 14, 151-158.
13. Kluge, A.J., Wolf, A.J., 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics, 9, 183-199.
14. Kornet, D.J., Turner, H., 1999. Coding polymorphism for phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 48, 365-379.
15. Kottelat, M., 1997. European freshwater fishes. Biol. Bratislava, 52, 1-271.
16. Kunzler, R., Bakker, T.C.M., 2001. Female preferences for single and combined traits in computer animated stickleback males. Behav. Ecol. 12, 681-685.
17. Largiadér, C.R., Fries, V., Bakker, T.C.M., 2001. Genetic analysis of sneaking and egg-thievery in a natural population of three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Heredity, 86, 459-468.
18. Lee, D.-C., Bryant, H.N., 1999. A reconsideration of the coding of inapplicable characters: assumptions and problems. Cladistics, 15, 373-378.
19. Maddison, W.P., 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 576-581.
20. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2000. Macclade: Interactive Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
21. Mattern, M.Y., 2004. Molecular phylogeny of the Gasterosteidae: Elucidating relationships using five mitochondrial DNA genes. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 30, 366-377.
22. McKenzie, J.A., 1969. The courtship behavior of the male brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Can. J. Zool. 47, 1281-1286.
23. McLennan, D.A., 1991. Integrating phylogeny and experimental ethology: from pattern to process. Evolution 45, 1773-1789.
24. McLennan, D.A., 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in the Gasterosteidae: an updated tree based on behavioral characters with a discussion of homoplasy. Copeia, 1993, 318-326.
25. McLennan, D.A., 1996. Integrating phylogenetic and experimental analyses: The evolution of male and female nuptial coloration in the Gasterosteidae. Syst. Biol. 45, 261-277.
26. McLennan, D.A., 2000. The macroevolutionary diversification of female and male components of the stickleback breeding system. Behaviour, 137, 1029-1045.
27. McLennan, D.A., Brooks, D.R., McPhail, J.D., 1988. The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study using gasterosteid fishes. Can. J. Zool. 66, 2177-2190.
28. McLennan, D.A., Mattern, M.Y., 2001. The phylogeny of the Gasterosteidae: combining behavioral and morphological data sets. Cladistics, 17, 11-27.
29. McPhail, J.D., 1994. Speciation and the evolution of reproductive isolation in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) of southwest British Columbia. In: Bell, M.A., Foster, S.A. (Eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 28-60.
30. Milinski, M., Bakker, T.C.M., 1990. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, 344, 331-333.
31. Nelson, J.S., 1971. Comparison of the pectoral and pelvic skeletons and of some other bones and their phylogenetic implications in the Aulorhynchidae and Gasterosteidae (Pisces). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 28, 427-442.
32. Orti, G., Bell, M.A., Reimchen, T.E., Meyer, A., 1994. Global survey of mitochondrial DNA sequences in the threespine stickleback: evidence for recent migrations. Evolution, 48, 608-622.
33. ter Pelkwijk, J.J., Tinbergen, N., 1937. Eine reizbiologische Analyse einiger Verhaltensweisen von Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Z. Tierpsychol. 1, 193-200.
34. Pollock, D.D., Bruno, W.J., 2000. Assessing an unknown evolutionary process: Effect of increasing site-specific knowledge through taxon addition. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1854-1858.
35. Pollock, D.D., Eisen, J.A., Doggett, N.A., Cummings, M.P., 2000. A case for evolutionary genomics and the comprehensive examination of sequences biodiversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1776-1788.
36. Pollock, D.D., Zwickl, D.J., McGuire, J.A., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51, 664-671.
37. Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C., 1988. Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme -analysis of DNA and amino-acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 27, 326-335.
38. Remane, A., 1956. Die Gründlagen des Naturlichen System der Vergleichenden Anatomie und Phylogenetik. 2. Geest und Portig, Leipzig.
39. Rowland, W.J., 1994. Proximate determinants of stickleback behaviour. An evolutionary perspective. In: Bell, M.A., Foster, S.A. (Eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 297-344.
40. Sanderson, M.J., Donoghue, M.J., 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution, 43, 1781-1795.
41. Schluter, D., 1993. Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: size, shape, and habitat use efficiency. Ecology, 74, 699-709.
42. Schluter, D., 1994. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science, 266, 798-801.
43. Siddall, M.E., Kluge, A.J., 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics, 13, 313-336.
44. Sorenson, M.D., 1999. Treerot, Version 2. Boston University, Boston, MA.
45. Strong, E.E., Lipscomb, D., 1999. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics, 15, 363-371.
46. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
47. Takahashi, K., Goto, A., 2001. Evolution of East Asian ninespine stickleback as shown by mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21, 135-155.
48. Templeton, A.R., 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution, 37, 221-244.
49. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
50. Wootton, R.J., 1976. The Biology of the Sticklebacks. Academic Press, London.
51. Wootton, R.J., 1984. The Biology of the Sticklebacks, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London.
52. Zwickl, D.J., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51, 588-598.