Geographic variation of genetic and behavioral traits in northern and southern túngara frogs

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1669-1679

  Pröhl, Heike ^a,b,c   Koshy, Regina A ^a   Mueller, Ulrich ^a   Rand, A Stanley ^b   Ryan, Michael J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioacoustic variation; Genetic variation; Microsatellites; Physalaemus pustulosus; Reproductive isolation; T ngara frogs

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CALLING BEHAVIOR; FROG; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MATE CHOICE;

CENTRAL AMERICA; COSTA RICA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; PANAMA [CENTRAL AMERICA]; SOUTH AMERICA;

ANURA; PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COSTA RICA; DEMOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FROG; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; PANAMA; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; COSTA RICA; DEMOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; PANAMA; RANIDAE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS); VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 33750594326     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-278.1     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Balaban, E. 1988. Cultural and genetic variation in swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana). 1. Song variation, genetic variation and their relationship. Behaviour 105:250-291.
2. Beemann, K. 1996. Signal. Engineering Design, Belmont, MA.
3. Christianson, S. J., J. G. Swallow, and G. S. Wilkinson. 2005. Rapid evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in stalk-eyed flies. Evolution 59:849-857.
4. Claridge, M. F., and P. De Vrijer. 1993. Reproductive behaviour: the role of acoustic signals in species recognition and speciation. Pp. 216-233 in R. Denno and T. J. Perfect, eds. Ecology and genetics of planthoppers. Chapman and Hall, London.
5. Claridge, M. F., and J. Morgan. 1993. Geographical variation in acoustic signals of the planthopper, Nilaparvata bakeri (Muir), in Asia: species recognition and sexual selection. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48:267-281.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
7. Edmands, S. 2002. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:520-527.
8. Endler, J. A., and A. E. Houde. 1995. Geographical variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
9. Forrest, T. G. 1994. From sender to receiver: propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. Am. Zool. 34:644-654.
10. Gabor, C. R., and M. J. Ryan. 2001. Geographical variation in reproductive character displacement in mate choice by male sail-fin mollies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1063-1070.
11. Gerhardt, H. C., and F. Huber. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Gerhardt, H. C., and J. J. Schwartz. 1995. Interspecific interactions and species recognition. Pp. 603-632 in H. Heatwole and B. K. Sullivan, eds. Amphibian biology. Vol. 2. Social behaviour. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, U.K.
13. Gleason, J. M., and M. G. Ritchie. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52:1493-1500.
14. Guo, S., and E. Thompson. 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361-372.
15. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
16. Höbel, G., and C. Gerhardt. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 57:894-904.
17. Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353-1356.
18. Kime, N. M., W. R. Turner, and M. J. Ryan. 2000. The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behav. Ecol. 11:71-83.
19. Lampert, K. P., A. S. Rand, U. G. Mueller, and M. J. Ryan. 2003. Fine-scale genetic pattern and evidence for sex-biased dispersal in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Mol. Ecol. 12:3325-3334.
20. Leblois, R., F. Rousset, D. Tikel, C. Moritz, and A. Estoup. 2000. Absence of evidence for isolation by distance in an expanding cane toad (Bufo marinus) population: an individual-based analysis of microsatellite genotypes. Mol. Ecol. 9:1905-1909.
21. Liedloff, A. 1999. Mantel. Ver. 2. Mantel nonparametric test calculator. Available via http://www.sci.qut.edu.au/nrs/mantel.htm.
22. Littlejohn, M. J., and G. F. Watson. 1985. Hybrid zones and homogamy in Australian frogs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:85-112.
23. Lougheed, S. C., and P. Handford. 1992. Vocal dialects and the structure of geographic variation in morphological and allozymic characters in the rufous-collared sparrow, Zonotricha capensis. Evolution 46:1443-1456.
24. Lowe, A., S. Harris, and P. Ashton. 2004. Ecological genetics. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
25. MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., and S. A. MacDougall-Shackleton. 2001. Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution 55:2568-2575.
26. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2005. Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375.
27. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
28. _. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
29. Nei, M., and W.-H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269-5273.
30. Newman, R. A., and T. Squire. 2001. Microsatellite variation and fine-scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Mol. Ecol. 10:1087-1100.
31. Panhuis, T. M., R. Butlin, M. Zuk, and T. Tregenza. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:364-371.
32. Pfennig, K. S. 2000. Female spadefoot toads comprise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 11:220-227.
33. Pröhl, H., R. M. M. Adams, U. Mueller, S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2002. Polymerase chain reaction for polymorphic microsatellite loci from the túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:341-343.
34. Rand, A. S., and M. J. Ryan. 1981. The adaptive significance of the complex vocal repertoire in a Neotropical frog. Z. Tierpsychol. 57:209-214.
35. Ritchie, M. G., R. M. Townhill, and A. Hoikkala. 1998. Female preference for fly song: playbacks confirm correlational evidence of the targets of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56:713-715.
36. Rowe, C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multi-component signals. Anim. Behav. 58:921-931.
37. Rowe, G., T. J. C. Beebee, and T. Burke. 2000. A microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) metapopulations. Oikos 88:641-651.
38. Ryan, M. J. 1980. Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Science 209:523-525.
39. _. 1983. Sexual selection and communication in a Neotropical frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 39:261-272.
40. _. 1985. The túngara frog, a study in sexual selection and communication. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
41. _. 1998. Receiver biases, sexual selection, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999-2003.
42. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
43. _. 1995. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in the túngara frog. Science 269:390-392.
44. _. 2001. Feature weighting in signal recognition and discrimination in túngara frogs. Pp. 86-101 in M. J. Ryan, ed. Anuran communication. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC.
45. _. 2003. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals. Evolution 57:2608-2618.
46. Ryan, M. J., R. B. Cocroft, and W. Wilczynski. 1990a. The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Evolution 44:1869-1872.
47. Ryan, M. J., J. H. Fox, W. Wilczynski, and A. S. Rand. 1990b. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 343:66-67.
48. Ryan, M. J., A. S. Rand, and L. A. Weigt. 1996. Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution 50:2435-2453.
49. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
50. Savage, J. M. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
51. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-380.
52. Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin. Ver. 2.000. Software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Univ. of Geneva, Geneva.
53. Seppä, P., and A. Laurila. 1999. Genetic structure of island populations of the anurans Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo. Heredity 82:309-317.
54. Simmons, L. W., M. Zuk, and J. T. Rotenbenberry. 2001. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55:1386-1394.
55. Slatkin, M. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264-279.
56. _. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.
57. Slatkin, M., and L. Excoffier. 1996. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in genotypic data using the EM algorithm. Heredity 76:377-383.
58. Smouse, P. E., J. C. Long, and R. R. Sokal. 1986. Multiple regression and correlational extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627-632.
59. Soha, J. A., D. A. Nelson, and P. G. Parker. 2004. Genetic analysis of song dialect populations in Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows. Behav. Ecol. 15:636-646.
60. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. Freeman and Company, New York.
61. Stenson, A. G., A. Malhotra, and R. S. Thorpe. 2002. Population differentiation and nuclear gene flow in the Dominican anole (Anolis oculatus). Mol. Ecol. 11:1679-1688.
62. Szymura, J. M. 1993. Analysis of hybrid zones with Bombina. Pp. 261-289 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
63. Tilley, S. G., P. A. Verrell, and S. J. Arnold. 1990. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2715-2719.
64. Tregenza, T. 2002. Divergence and reproductive isolation in the early stages of speciation. Genetica 116:291-300.
65. Vos, C. C., A. G. Antonisse-De Jong, P. W. Goedhart, and M. J. M. Smulders. 2001. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86:598-608.
66. Wake, D. B., and K. P. Yaney. 1986. Geographic variation in allozymes in a "ring species," the plethodontid salamander Ensatina escholtzii of western North America. Evolution 40:702-715.
67. Weigt, L. A., A. J. Crawford, A. S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2005. Biogeography of the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus: a molecular perspective. Mol. Ecol. 14:3857-3876.
68. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
69. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:139-156.
70. Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D. J. Begun, C. F. Aquadro, Y. Xu, and M.-L. Wu. 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2519-2523.
71. Zuk, M., J. D. Ligon, and R. Thornhill. 1992. Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female preference in red jungle fowl. Anim. Behav. 44:999-1006.