|
Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 313-319
|
Probing material properties of polymeric surface layers with tapping mode AFM: Which cantilever spring constant, tapping amplitude and amplitude set point gives good image contrast and minimal surface damage?
|
Author keywords
AFM; Amplitude; Energy dissipation; Phase; Set point; Spring constant; Tapping mode
|
Indexed keywords
AFM;
AFM IMAGING;
CANTILEVER SPRINGS;
ELASTIC PROPERTIES;
IMAGE CONTRASTS;
LOW-AMPLITUDE;
MATERIAL PROPERTY;
MINIMAL SURFACES;
OSCILLATORY MOTION;
PHASE IMAGE;
PHASE RESPONSE;
POLYMERIC SURFACES;
SET-POINT;
SOFT SURFACE;
SPRING CONSTANTS;
SURFACE DAMAGES;
SURFACE LAYERS;
SURFACE SEPARATION;
TAPPING MODES;
ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;
ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY;
ENERGY DISSIPATION;
ENERGY DISSIPATORS;
NANOCANTILEVERS;
SURFACES;
POLYMER;
ARTICLE;
ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MATERIAL STATE;
MOLECULAR PROBE;
OSCILLATION;
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;
PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
|
EID: 77649188563
PISSN: 03043991
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.01.002 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (20)
|