Experimental psychology: A note on statistical analysis

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-4

  Erdfelder, Edgar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77649154239     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000001     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
3. Bar-Anan, Y., Nosek, B. A., & Vianello, M. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329-343, doi: 10.1027/1618- 3169.56.5.329.
4. Bianchi, M., Machunsky, M., Steffens, M. C., & Mummendey, A. (2009). Like me or like us: Is ingroup projection just social projection? Experimental Psychology, 56, 198-205, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.198.
5. Bredenkamp, J. (1969). Über die Anwendung des Signifikanztests bei theorietestenden Experimenten [Application of significance tests in theory-testing experiments]. Psychologische Beiträge, 11, 275-285.
6. Bredenkamp, J. (1972). Der Signifikanztest in der psychologischen Forschung [The significance test in psychological research]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
7. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cumming, G., & Fidler, F. (2009). Confidence intervals: Better answers to better questions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 15-26, doi: 10.1027/0044- 3409.217.1.15.
10. Curran-Everett, D., & Benos, D. J. (2004). Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Advances in Physiology Education, 28, 85-87, doi: 10.1152/advan.00019.2004.
11. Deroost, N., Coomans, D., & Soetens, E. (2009). Perceptual load improves the expression but not learning of relevant sequence information. Experimental Psychology, 56, 84-91, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.84.
12. Deutsch, R., Kordts-Freudinger, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2009). Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 434-446, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.434.
13. Duyck, W., & Warlop, N. (2009). Translation priming between the native language and a second language. Experimental Psychology, 56, 173-179, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.173.
14. Erdfelder, E. (1984). Zur Bedeutung und Kontrolle des beta- Fehlers bei der inferenzstatistischen Prüfung log-linearer Modelle [On significance and control of beta errors in statistical tests of log-linear models]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 18-32.
15. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T. S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108.
16. Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Bacon, A. M. (2009). Reasoning under time pressure: A study of causal conditional inference. Experimental Psychology, 56, 188-197, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.77.
17. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analysis using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
18. Fidler, F., & Loftus, G. R. (2009). Why figures with error bars should replace p values: Some conceptual arguments and empirical demonstrations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 27-37, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27.
19. Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? Experimental Psychology, 56, 56-65, doi: 10.1027/1618- 3169.56.1.56.
20. Johansson, T. (2009). Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: No evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure. Experimental Psychology, 56, 188-197, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.188.
21. Kaufmann, M., & Betsch, T. (2009). Origins of the sample size effect in explicit evaluative judgment. Experimental Psychology, 56, 344-353, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.344.
22. Koele, P. (1982). Calculating power in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 513-516.
23. Lemhöfer, K., & Radach, R. (2009). Task context effects in bilingual nonword processing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 41-47, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.41.
24. Locker, L., Hoffman, L., & Bovaird, J. A. (2007). On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 723-730.
25. Machunsky, M., Meiser, T., & Mummendey, A. (2009). On the crucial role of the mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology, 56, 156-164, doi: 10.1027/1618- 3169.56.3.156.
26. Marewski, J. N., & Olsson, H. (2009). Beyond the null ritual: Formal modeling of psychological processes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 49-60, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.49.
27. Martin, D., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). Lateralized repetition priming for unfamiliar faces. Experimental Psychology, 56, 147-155, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.147.
28. Melton, A. W. (1962). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 553-557.
29. Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 55, 269-282, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269.
30. Perea, M., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 384-393, doi: 10.1027/1618- 3169.55.6.384.
31. Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). A further look at "the language-asfixed- effect fallacy". Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 141-151.
32. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
33. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2009). Effect sizes: Why, when, and how to use them. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 6-14, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.6.
34. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D. C., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237, doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.
35. Stahl, C., & Meiser, T. (2009). New directions in multinomial modeling. Zeitschrift fü r Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 105-107, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.105.
36. Sugrue, K., Strange, D., & Hayne, H. (2009). False memories in the DRM paradigm: Age-related differences in lure activation and source monitoring. Experimental Psychology, 56, 354- 360, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.354.
37. Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2009). Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading. Experimental Psychology, 56, 66-74, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.66.
38. Welvaert, M., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 54-63, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.54.
39. Westermann, R., & Hager, W. (1986). Error probabilities in educational and psychological research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 117-146.
40. Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237, doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.752.
41. Wilkinson, L., & The Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.