New directions in multinomial modeling

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 217, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 105-107

  Stahl, Christoph ^a   Meiser, Thorsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649127715     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.105     Document Type: Editorial

References (27)

1. Andersen, E. B. (1990). The statistical analysis of categorical data. Berlin: Springer.
2. Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 10, 331-334.
3. Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Smith, J. B. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models for discrete choice. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 217, 149-158.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1980). Separation of storage and retrieval factors in free recall of clusterable pairs. Psychological Review, 87, 375-397.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1986). The statistical analysis of a model for storage and retrieval processes in human memory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 39, 129-149.
6. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process three modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
7. Bellezza, F. S. (2009). Modeling guessing: The influence of multinomial models on the evolution of process-dissociation theory. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 217, 125-135.
8. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
10. Bröder, A. (2009). Semantically clustered words are stored with integrated context: Validating a measurement model for source memory, storage, and retrieval in free recall. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 217, 136-148.
11. Bröder, A., & Meiser, T. (2007). Measuring source memory. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 215, 52-60.
12. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M. C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 508-517.
13. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T. S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124.
14. Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data. New York: Academic Press.
15. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-531.
16. Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 1-31.
17. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
18. Maris, E., & de Graaff Stoffers, R. (2009). Dual and single route models for beginning readers: A comparison by means of multinomial processing tree models. Zeitschrift für Psychology / Journal of Psychology, 217, 159-174.
19. Meiser, T., Sattler, C., & Weißer, K. (2008). Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 32-49.
20. Riefer, D. M., Knapp, B. R., Batchelder, W. H., Bamber, D., & Manifold, V. (2002). Cognitive psychometrics: Assessing storage and retrieval deficits in special populations with multinomial processing tree models. Psychological Assessment, 14, 184-201.
21. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Morey, R. D., Sun, D., & Speckman, P. L. (2008). A hierarchical process dissociation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 370-389.
22. Stahl, C., & Degner, J. (2007). Assessing automatic activation of valence: A multinomial model of EAST performance. Experimental Psychology, 54, 99-112.
23. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
24. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2008). A simplified conjoint recognition paradigm for the measurement of gist and verbatim memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 570-586.
25. Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., & Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1152-1164.
26. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
27. Yu, J., & Bellezza, F. S. (2000). Process dissociation as source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1518-1533.