The sorting paired features task a measure of association strengths

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 329-343

  Bar Anan, Yoav ^a   Nosek, Brian A ^a   Vianello, Michelangelo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attitude measures; Automatic association; Automatic attitudes; Implicit measures; Priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLITICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTITUDE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STEREOTYPING; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 67649562825     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.329     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bar-Anan, Y., Nosek, B. A., and Vianello, M. (2008). A comparison between the SPF and evaluative priming Unpublished manuscript (http://www.briannosek. com/spf/).
2. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W., and Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
3. Cai, H., Sriram, N., Greenwald, A. G., and McFarland, S. G. (2004). The implicit association test's D measure can minimize a cognitive skill confound: Comment on McFarland and Crouch (2002). Social Cognition, 22, 673-684.
4. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
5. Craik, F. I. M., and Birtwistle, J. (1971). Proactive inhibition in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 120-123.
6. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., and Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
7. Dasgupta, N., and Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
8. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
9. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., and Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., and Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and selfconcept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
11. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
12. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
13. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski, (Eds), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). Guilford: New York.
14. Karpinski, A., and Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
15. Klauer, K. C., and Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the implicit association test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208-217.
16. Mierke, J., and Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192.
17. Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584.
18. Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65-69.
19. Nosek, B. A., and Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-666.
20. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166-180.
21. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. (2007). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265-292). Psychology Press: New York.
22. Nosek, B. A., and Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14-29.
23. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36-88.
24. Nosek, B. A., and Sriram, N. (2007). Faulty assumptions: A comment on Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 393-398.
25. Olson, M. A., and Fazio, R. H. (2003). Relations between implicit measures of prejudice: What are we measuring? Psychological Science, 14, 36-39.
26. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., and Stewart, B. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
27. Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., and Nosek, B. A. (2008). Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 386-396.
28. Rudman, L. A., and Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494-509.
29. Smith, C. T., and Nosek, B. A. (2007a). Affective focus increases the concordance between implicit and explicit attitudes. Unpublished manuscript.
30. Smith, C. T., and Nosek, B. A. (2007b). Unpublished manuscript.
31. Sriram, N., Bar-Anan, Y., and Nosek, B. A. (2008). Unpublished manuscript.
32. Sriram, N., and Greenwald, A. G. (in press). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology.
33. Sriram, N., Nosek, B. A., and Greenwald, A. G. (2008). Scale invariant contrasts of response latency distributions. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
35. Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmuller, M., and Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36-49.
36. Vianello, M., Bar-Anan, Y., and Nosek, B. A. (2008). Reliability of the SPF: Test-retest and internal consistency. Unpublished manuscript (http://www.briannosek.com/spf/).
37. Wigboldus, D. H. J., Holland, R. W., and van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Single target implicit associations. Unpublished manuscript.
38. Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 396-399.
39. Wyer, R. S. (2007). Principles of mental representation. In A. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 285-307). New York: Guilford.