A Further Look at the "Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy"

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 141-151

  Raaijmakers, Jeroen G W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141456304     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087421     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
2. Coleman, E. B. (1964). Generalizing to a language population. Psychological Reports, 14, 219-226.
3. Davenport, J. M., & Webster, J. T. (1973). A comparison of some approximate F-tests. Technometrics, 15, 779-789.
4. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1995). On the use of counter-balanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
5. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
6. Smith, J. E. K. (1976). The assuming-will-make-it-so fallacy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 262-263.
7. Wickens, T. D., & Keppel, G. (1983). On the choice of design and of test statistic in the analysis of experiments with sampled materials. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 296-309.
8. Wike, E. L., & Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark's "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 249-255.