Modeling guessing: The influence of multinomial models on the evolution of process-dissociation theory

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 217, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 125-135

  Bellezza, Francis S ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Modeling guessing; Multinomial modeling; Process dissociation; Source monitoring; Unconscious processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952471789     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.125     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial processing tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
3. Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., & Hu, X. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring; Reply to Kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
4. Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
5. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M. C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 508-517.
6. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
7. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
8. Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., & Shimamura, A. E. (1998). On the recollection of specific-and partial-source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1121-1136.
9. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
10. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Process-dissociation measurement models: Threshold theory or detection theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 83-96.
11. Estes, W. K. (1964). Probability learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 89-128). New York: Academic Press.
12. Graf, P., & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process-dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113-129.
13. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
14. Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Separating habit and recollection: Memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1323-1335.
15. Hu, X., & Phillips, G. A. (1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 31, 220-234.
16. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-531.
17. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
18. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, J. J. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
19. Kinchla, R. A. (1994). Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. Psychological Review, 101, 166-171.
20. Malmberg, K. J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 380-387.
21. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 224-233.
22. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
23. Ogilvie, J. C., & Creelman, C. D. (1968). Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic curve parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 377-391.
24. Parks, T. E. (1966). Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 44-58.
25. Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2007). Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Pscyhological Review, 114, 188-202.
26. Payne, B. K. (2008). What mistakes disclose: A process dissociation approach to automatic and controlled processes in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1073-1092.
27. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-372.
28. Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1994). The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process-dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993). Neuropsychology, 8, 284-288.
29. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1499-1517.
30. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
31. Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., & Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1152-1164.
32. Toglia, M. P., & Battig, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
34. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
35. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
36. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361-379.
37. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review if 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
38. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
39. Yonelinas, A. P., & Parks, C. P. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800-832.
40. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 821-835.
41. Yu, J., & Bellezza, F. S. (2000). Process dissociation as source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1518-1533.