Multinomial processing tree models for discrete choice

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 217, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 149-158

  Batchelder, William H ^a   Hu, Xiangen ^b   Smith, Jared B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete choice; Multinomial processing tree models; Paired comparisons

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952526559     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.149     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Bershad, N. J. (1979). The statistical treatment of a Thurstonian model for rating chess players. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 39-60.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (2007). Using multinomial processing tree models to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. In R. Neufeld (Ed.), Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms (pp. 19-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
4. Bower, G. H. (1959). Choice point behavior. In R. R. Bush & W. K. Estes (Eds.), Studies in mathematical learning theory (pp. 109-124). Stanford: Stanford University Press (chap. 6).
5. Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
6. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
7. Crowther, C. S., Batchelder, W. H., & Hu, X. (1995). A measurement-theoretic analysis of the fuzzy logic model of perception. Psychological Review, 102, 396-408.
8. Cutting, J. E. (2000). Accuracy, scope, and flexibility of models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 3-19.
9. David, H. A. (1988). The method of paired comparisons (2nd ed.). London: Griffin.
10. Davidson, R. R., & Farquhar, P. H. (1976). A bibliography on the method of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 32, 241-252.
11. Elo, A. (1978). The rating of chess players: Past and present. New York: Arco.
12. Evans, M., Hastings, N., & Peacock, B. (2000). Statistical distributions (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
13. Fahrmeir, L., & Tutz, G. (2001). Multivariate statistical modeling based on general linear models (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
14. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Hohle, R. H. (1966). An empirical evaluation and comparison of two models for discriminatory scales. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 174-183.
16. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
17. Hu, X., & Phillips, G. A. (1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 220-234.
18. Knapp, B. R., & Batchelder, W. H. (2004). Representing parametric order constraints in multi-trial applications of multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215-229.
19. Knuth, D. E. (1997). The art of computer programming, Volume 1: Fundamental algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
20. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
21. Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 249-410). New York: Wiley.
22. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., Campbell, C. S., & Rodriguez, T. (2001). Bayes factor of model selection validates FLMP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 1-17.
24. Myung, I. J., Forster, M. R., & Pitt, M. A. (2000). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, [Special issue on Model Selection].
25. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Pitt, M. A., Kim, W., & Myung, I. J. (2003). Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 29-44.
27. Purdy, B. P., & Batchelder, W. H. (in press). A context-free language for binary multinomial processing tree models.
28. Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley.
29. Ross, S. M. (2007). Probability models (9th ed.). San Diego: Elsevier.
30. Stahl, C. (2006). Multinomial processing tree models in social psychology [Multinomiale verarbeitungsbaummodelle in der sozial psychologie]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 161-171.
31. Suppes, P., & Zinnes, J. L. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology I (pp. 1-102). New York: Wiley.
32. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
33. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
34. Tversky, A., & Sattath, S. (1979). Preference trees. Psychological Review, 86, 542-573.