BCL::Contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 153-168

  Karakaş, Mert ^a   Woetzel, Nils ^a   Meiler, Jens ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Computational structural biology; Contact prediction; Structure prediction.

Indexed keywords

CASP7 PROTEIN, HUMAN; CASPASE 7;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CASPASE 7; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 77249140522     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0030     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Altschuh, D., Vernet, T., Berti, P., et al. 1988. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. Protein Eng. 2, 193-199.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
3. Aszodi, A., Gradwell, M.J., and Taylor, W.R. 1995. Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 251, 308-326.
4. Baker, D. 2000. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 405, 39-42.
5. Bonneau, R., Ruczinski, I., Tsai, J., et al. 2002a. Contact order and abinitio protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 11, 1937-1944.
6. Bonneau, R., Strauss, C.E.M., Rohl, C., et al. 2002b. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322, 65-78.
7. Bujnicki, J.M., Elofsson, A., Fischer, D., et al. 2001. LiveBench-1: continuous benchmarking of protein structure prediction servers. Protein Sci. 10, 352-361.
8. Cheng, J., and Baldi, P. 2006. A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics 22, 1456-1463.
9. Cheng, J., and Baldi, P. 2007. Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinform. 8, 113.
10. Chivian, D., and Baker, D. 2006. Homology modeling using parametric alignment ensemble generation with consensus and energy-based model selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e112.
11. Chivian, D., Kim, D.E., Malmstrom, L., et al. 2005. Prediction of CASP-6 structures using automated Robetta protocols. Proteins 61, 157-166.
12. Debe, D.A., Danzer, J.F., Goddard, W.A., et al. 2006. STRUCTFAST: protein sequence remote homology detection and alignment using novel dynamic programming and profile-profile scoring. Proteins 64, 960-967.
13. Fariselli, P., and Casadio, R. 1999. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng. 12, 15-21.
14. Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A., et al. 2001a. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 14, 835-843.
15. Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A., et al. 2001b. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins Suppl 5, 157-162.
16. Fischer, D. 2003. 3DS3 and 3DS5 3D-SHOTGUN meta-predictors in CAFASP3. Proteins 53, 517-523.
17. Fischer, D., Rychlewski, L., Dunbrack, R.L., Jr., et al. 2003. CAFASP3: the third critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 53, 503-516.
18. Ginalski, K., Elofsson, A., Fischer, D., et al. 2003a. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 19, 1015-1018.
19. Ginalski, K., Pas, J., Wyrwicz, L.S., et al. 2003b. ORFeus: Detection of distant homology using sequence profiles and predicted secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3804-3807.
20. Ginalski, K., and Rychlewski, L. 2003. Detection of reliable and unexpected protein fold predictions using 3D-Jury. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3291-3292.
21. Gobel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R., et al. 1994. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18, 309-317.
22. Grana, O., Baker, D., MacCallum, R.M., et al. 2005. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 61, 214-224.
23. Halperin, I., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2006. Correlated mutations: adVances and limitations. A study on fusion proteins and on the Cohesin-Dockerin families. Proteins 63, 832-845.
24. Hamilton, N., Burrage, K., Ragan, M.A., et al. 2004. Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation. Proteins 56, 679-684.
25. Huang, E.S., Samudrala, R., and Ponder, J.W. 1999. Abinitio fold prediction of small helical proteins using distance geometry and knowledge-based scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 290, 267-281.
26. Izarzugaza, J.M., Grana, O., Tress, M.L., et al. 2007. Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7. Proteins 69, 152-158.
27. Jaroszewski, L., Rychlewski, L., Li, Z., et al. 2005. FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W284-W288.
28. Jones, D.T. 1999. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 797-815.
29. Karplus, K., and Hu, B. 2001. Evaluation of protein multiple alignments by SAM-T99 using the BAliBASE multiple alignment test set. Bioinformatics 17, 713-720.
30. Karplus, K., Katzman, S., Shackleford, G., et al. 2005. SAM-T04: what is new in protein-structure prediction for CASP6. Proteins 61, 135-142.
31. Kundrotas, P.J., and Alexov, E.G. 2006. Predicting residue contacts using pragmatic correlated mutations method: reducing the false positives. BMC Bioinform. 7, 503.
32. Lee, S.Y., and Skolnick, J. 2008. Benchmarking of TASSER 2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints. Biophys. J. 95, 1956-1964.
33. Li, W., Zhang, Y., and Skolnick, J. 2004. Application of sparse NMR restraints to large-scale protein structure prediction. Biophys. J. 87, 1241-1248.
34. Lund, O., Frimand, K., Gorodkin, J., et al. 1997. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Protein Eng. 10, 1241-1248.
35. Lundstroem, J., Rychlewski, L., Bujnicki, J., et al. 2001. Pcons: a neural-network -based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci. 10, 2354-2362.
36. McGuffin, L.J., and Jones, D.T. 2003. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 19, 874-881.
37. Meiler, J., and Baker, D. 2003. Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12105-12110.
38. Meiler, J., Mü ller, M., Zeidler, A., et al. 2001. Generation and evaluation of dimension reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. J. Mol. Model. 7, 360-369.
39. Olmea, O., Rost, B., and Valencia, A. 1999. Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 1221-1239.
40. Olmea, O., and Valencia, A. 1997. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des. 2, S25-S32.
41. Ortiz, A.R., Strauss, C.E.M., and Olmea, O. 2002. MAMMOTH (Matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci. 11, 2606-2611.
42. Plaxco, K.W., Larson, S., Ruczinski, I., et al. 2000. Evolutionary conservation in protein folding kinetics. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 303-312.
43. Pollastri, G., and Baldi, P. 2002. Prediction of contact maps by GIOHMMs and recurrent neural networks using lateral propagation from all four cardinal corners. Bioinformatics 18, S62-S70.
44. Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Fariselli, P., et al. 2001. Improved prediction of the number of residue contacts in proteins by recurrent neural networks. Bioinformatics 17, S234-S242.
45. Pollock, D.D., Taylor, W.R., and Goldman, N. 1999. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol. 287, 187-198.
46. Punta, M., and Rost, B. 2005a. PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 21, 2960-2968.
47. Punta, M., and Rost, B. 2005b. Protein folding rates estimated from contact predictions. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 507-512.
48. Russell, R.B., Saqi, M.A., Bates, P.A., et al. 1998. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds- assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 11, 1-9.
49. Rychlewski, L., and Fischer, D. 2005. LiveBench-8: the large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 14, 240-245.
50. Sali, A., and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815.
51. Shackelford, G., and Karplus, K. 2007. Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins 69, 159-164.
52. Shao, Y., and Bystroff, C. 2003. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 53, 497-502.
53. Shi, J., Blundell, T.L., and Mizuguchi, K. 2001. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environmentspecific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol. 310, 243-257.
54. Shindyalov, I.N., Kolchanov, N.A., and Sander, C. 1994. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? Protein Eng. 7, 349-358.
55. Simons, K.T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E., et al. 1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 209-225.
56. Skolnick, J., and Kihara, D. 2001. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR-a new approach to threading. Proteins 42, 319-331.
57. Skolnick, J., Kihara, D., and Zhang, Y. 2004. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3 threading algorithm. Proteins 56, 502-518.
58. Tomii, K., Hirokawa, T., and Motono, C. 2005. Protein structure prediction using a variety of profile libraries and 3D verification. Proteins 61, 114-121.
59. Torda, A.E., Procter, J.B., and Huber, T. 2004. Wurst: a protein threading server with a structural scoring function, sequence profiles and optimized substitution matrices. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W532-535.
60. Valencia, A., and Pazos, F. 2002. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 368-373.
61. Wang, G., and Dunbrack, R.L., Jr. 2003. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19, 1589-1591.
62. Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. 2007. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3375-3382.
63. Wu, S., and Zhang, Y. 2008. A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 24, 924-931.
64. Zhang, W., Liu, S., and Zhou, Y. 2008. SP5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS ONE 3, e2325.
65. Zhang, Y., and Skolnick, J. 2004. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7594-7599.