Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 8, 2007, Pages 152-158

  Izarzugaza, José M G ^a   Graña, Osvaldo ^a   Tress, Michael L ^a   Valencia, Alfonso ^a   Clarke, Neil D ^b  

^a Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas   (Spain)

^b GENOME INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

CASP7; Contact prediction; Intramolecular contacts

Indexed keywords

CASPASE 6; CASPASE 7;

ACCURACY; CONFERENCE PAPER; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 36749082814     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21637     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. MONSSTER: A method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1997;265:217-241.
2. Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol 1987;193:693-707.
3. Altschuh D, Vernet T, Berti P, Moras D, Nagai K. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. Protein Eng 1988;2:193-199.
4. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:309-317.
5. Taylor WR, Hatrick K. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng 1994;7:341-348.
6. Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N. Coevolving protein residues: Maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 1999;287:187-198.
7. Tuffery P, Darlu P. Exploring a phylogenetic approach for the detection of correlated substitutions in proteins. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:1753-1759.
8. Fukami-Kobayashi K, Schreiber DR, Benner SA. Detecting compensatory covariation signals in protein evolution using reconstructed ancestral sequences. J Mol Biol 2002;319:729-743.
9. Dekker JP, Fodor A, Aldrich RW, Yellen G. A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1565-1572.
10. Fares MA, Travers SA. A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: Adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses. Genetics 2006;173:9-23.
11. Kundrotas PJ, Alexov EG. Predicting residue contacts using pragmatic correlated mutations method: Reducing the false positives. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:503.
12. Fodor AA, Aldrich RW. Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins 2004;56:211-221.
13. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:171-178.
14. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1997;271:511-523.
15. Tress M, de Juan D, Grana O, Gomez MJ, Gomez-Puertas P, Gonzalez JM, Lopez G, Valencia A. Scoring docking models with evolutionary information. Proteins 2005;60:275-280.
16. Grana O, Baker D, MacCallum RM, Meiler J, Punta M, Rost B, Tress ML, Valencia A. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 2005;61(Suppl 7):214-224.
17. Grana O, Eyrich VA, Pazos F, Rost B, Valencia A. EVAcon: A protein contact prediction evaluation service. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W347-W351. Online issue.
18. Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, Mitros T, Soto CS, Goldsmith-Fischman S, Kernytsky A, Schlessinger A, Koh IY, Alexov E, Honig B. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):430-435.
19. Punta M, Rost B. PROFcon: Novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2960-2968.