HR practices, interpersonal relations, and intrafirm knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A social network perspective

Human Resource Management

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 615-639

  Kaše, Robert ^a   Paauwe, Jaap ^b   Zupan, Nada ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

HRM; Interpersonal relations; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge intensive firms; MRQAP; Social network perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 77049107608     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: 1099050X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20301     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R.G. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of Operations Management, 21(1), 19-43.
3. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
4. Barnes, J. (1979). Network analysis: Orienting notion, rigorous technique or substantive fi eld of study? In P.W. Holland & S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on social network research (pp. 403-423). New York: Academic Press.
5. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
6. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek-program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47-57.
7. Becerra, M., & Gupta, A.K. (2003). Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 32-44.
8. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R.E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis [Computer software]. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
10. Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
11. Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67-94.
12. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Brass, D.J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resource management. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management: Vol. 13 (pp. 39-79). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Brass, D.J. (2000). Networks and frog ponds: Trends in multilevel research. In K.J. Klein & S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 557-571). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817.
16. Burt, R.S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Cardon, M.S., & Stevens, C.E. (2004). Managing human resources in small organizations: What do we know? Human Resource Management Review, 14(3), 295-323.
18. Chowdhury, S. (2005). The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(3), 310-326.
19. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
20. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(suppl. 1), S95-S120.
21. Collins, C.J., & Clark, K.D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740-751.
22. Collins, C.J., & Smith, K.G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high technology fi rms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
23. Contractor, N.S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic frame-work and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681-703.
24. Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S.P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100-120.
25. Cross, R., & Prusak, L. (2003). The political economy of knowledge markets in organizations. In M. Easterby-Smith & M.A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 454-472). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
26. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446-462.
27. Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72(4), 563-581.
28. Delery, J.E. (1998). Issues of fi t in strategic human resource management: Implications for research. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3), 289-309.
29. Delery, J.E., & Doty, H.D. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
30. Evans, R.W., & Davis, W.D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31(5), 758-775.
31. Ferrin, D.L., & Dirks, K.T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18-31.
32. Galaskiewicz, J. (2007). Editorial: Has a network theory of organizational behaviour lived up to its promises? Management and Organization Review, 3(1), 1-18.
33. Gittell, J.H., & Weiss, L. (2004). Coordination networks within and across organizations: A multi-level framework. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 127-153.
34. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
35. Gratton, L. (2005). Managing integration through cooperation. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 151-158.
36. Gray, P.H., & Meister, D.B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50(6), 821-834.
37. Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
38. Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
39. Hansen, M.T., & Nohria, N. (2004). How to build collaborative advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22-30.
40. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-116.
41. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-447.
42. Kang, S.C., Morris, S.S., & Snell, S.A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236-256.
43. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
44. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Social networks and organizations. London: Sage.
45. Kilduff, M., Tsai, W., & Hanke, R. (2006). A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1031-1048.
46. Klein, K.J., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (Eds.). (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Koehly, L.M., & Pattison, P. (2005). Random graph models for social networks: Multiple relations or multiple raters. In P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 162-191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Kogut, B. (2007). Introduction to complexity: Emergence, graphs, and management studies. European Management Review, 4(2), 67-72.
49. Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Non-parametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359-381.
50. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
51. Labianca, G., & Brass, D.J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596-614.
52. Leana, C.R., & Van Buren, H.J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555.
53. Lengnick-Hall, M.L., & Lengnick-Hall, C.A. (2003). HR's role in building relationship networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 53-66.
54. Levin, D.Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
55. Levin, D.Z., Whitener, E.M., & Cross, R. (2004). Perceived trustworthiness of knowledge sources: The moderating impact of relationship length. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, New Orleans.
56. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
57. Marsden, P.V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1), 122-131.
58. McCallister, L., & Fischer, C. (1978). A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 7(2), 131-148.
59. McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444.
60. Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Moreland, R.L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117-133.
62. Morris, S.S., Snell, S.A., & Lepak, D.P. (2005). An architectural approach to managing knowledge stocks and flows: Implications for reinventing the human resource function. In R. Burke & C. Cooper (Eds.), Reinventing human resources: Challenges and new directions (pp. 57-80). London: Routledge Press.
63. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
64. Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2002). Managing knowledge work. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
65. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R.G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organization work. In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, action (pp. 288-308). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
66. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
67. Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D. (2002). Intraorganizational networks. In J.A.C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 59-74). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
68. Reagans, R. (2005). Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Science, 51(9), 1374-1383.
69. Reagans, R., Argote, L., & Brooks, D. (2005). Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51(6), 869-881.
70. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.
71. Reed, K.K., Lubatkin, M., & Srinivasan, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the fi rm. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 867-893.
72. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Yuval, K., & Dean, L. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173-191.
73. Roehling, M.V., Boswell, W.R., Caligiuri, P., Feldman, D., Graham, M.E., Guthrie, J.P., et al. (2005). The future of HR management: Research needs and directions. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 207-216.
74. Šašovova, Z. (2006). Liking and disliking: The dynamic effects of social networks during a large-scale information system implementation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije University Amsterdam.
75. Snell, S.A., Shadur, M.A., & Wright, P.M. (2002). Human resources strategy: The era of our ways. In M.A. Hitt, R.E. Freeman, & J.S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 627-649). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
76. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27.
77. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" with-in a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190.
78. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafi rm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
79. Tsoukas, H. (1996). The fi rm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11-25.
80. Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. In G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 18 (pp. 137-185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
81. Von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133-153.
82. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Wright, P.M., & Niishi, L. (forthcoming).Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In D. Guest, J. Paauwe, & P.M. Wright (Eds.), Human resource management and performance: Progress and prospects. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
84. Youndt, M.A., & Snell, S.A. (2004). Human resource confi gurations, intellectual capital, and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16(3), 337-361.
85. Zupan, N., & Kaše, R. (2007). The role of HR actors in knowledge networks. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 243-259.